“It could have been worse,” one owner incredibly concluded.

  • atocci
    link
    English
    25 hours ago

    Michael Reeves did it first.

  • @Tikiporch
    link
    English
    16 hours ago

    Precisely why I won’t use any of their camera robots. That, and Vacuum Wars said the Lidar performed better than the AI obstacle avoidance.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Wait, this situation is way worse than what’s on the headline. These things (ecovac robot vaccums) have remotely accessible cameras? What in the Heebie Jeebus?

    He opened the vacuum’s app to find a stranger was accessing its live camera feed and remote control feature, but assumed it might be an error.

  • sylver_dragon
    link
    English
    812 hours ago

    Unless and until companies are held truly accountable for releasing stuff with this bad of security baked in, we’re going to keep seeing this sort of story.

  • @shalafi
    link
    English
    1313 hours ago

    On one hand, that’s pretty funny. But why would you allow the thing on the internet? No experience with robot vacuums, but don’t you just throw in on the floor? Set and forget?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      It needs to communicate to the phone app somehow and anything else is going to be too big a hurdle for a huge portion of the customer base.

      • DarkThoughts
        link
        fedilink
        713 hours ago

        They would be within the same local wifi network. Or you could even use Bluetooth for a direct connection. There’s no reason for those things to connect to the internet, unless you want to update the firmware. Anything else is just a security and privacy risk.

        • @SpaceNoodle
          link
          English
          312 hours ago

          Even to update firmware, your phone could download the blob from the servers and then send it to the device via Bluetooth.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          313 hours ago

          I don’t think you’d even need the device itself to be connected to the internet for firmware. Your phone connects to the internet, gathers up the firmware, sends it to the device over BT. That’s how my helmet comms work.

          • DarkThoughts
            link
            fedilink
            111 hours ago

            If the device is connected to the local network and has some sort of maintenance UI then it might as well. I just don’t want it to be constantly connected or do it on its own.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        110 hours ago

        anything else is going to be too big a hurdle for a huge portion of the customer base.

        That’s just a lie companies tell to try to excuse their theft of your data. They could make it work locally and be user-friendly at the same time if they wanted to, but they just don’t want to.