• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unless you have a plan already in motion that will institute STAR voting and fully educate the public on it in the next 12 days, you get to shut up until after Kamala has won.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    And if they only seem to care about it in terms of the unwinnable Presidential race rather than being focused on winnable races lower down the ballot

  • Skates@feddit.nlBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m willing to agree you’re right, but I’m not willing to do anything about it

    And you wonder why you get trump.

      • distantsoundsBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been through this too many times. Forgive me if I’m cynical, the receipts are easy to find.

          • distantsoundsBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Easy to show? No, not yet. And to what end is another consideration

            • SatansMaggotyCumFartOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s like a riddle.

              ‘What’s easy to find but not easy to show yet?

              ‘And to what end is another consideration.’

              • almar_quigley
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh, I know this one! It s the hole in the barrel! Wait no, maybe it’s the woods…? Oh, no…ummmm. Oh it must be Jill Stein’s lack of policies and support of Putin’s interference in our government.

                • distantsoundsBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you’re cool with a pro-genocide duopoly, keep putting in the work.

              • distantsoundsBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                it’s a gaslight, isn’t it?

      • distantsoundsBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        DO NOT TALK ABOUT THE DUOPOLY

    • Soup
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You know how to guarantee that you have no power? Don’t vote. Not voting is 100% the best way to screw yourself over and the worse a candidate is the more they’re hoping people with any kind of morals stay home.

      Suck it up and vote. It sucks and needs to be better but not voting is such a bullshit stance that fails everyone.

        • Soup
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          It must be wild being that naive. You’re not clever, you’re handing an incredibly high amount of power to the people who want to use it to fuck you over basically for the fun of it.

          You do need to do what you say but if you don’t vote because you’re too busy throwing a temper tantrum you’re going to find that organizing, under what will basically be a far-right dictatorship, will be…rather difficult.

          • metaStatic@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Moderates are always first against the wall no matter who wins, but they tend to share their mass graves with the Anarchists who put them there. Don’t be a useful idiot

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          So set up cults then.

          You just said voting bad, so those alternatives are all going to inherently involve autocratic systems arising out of whatever “not voting” system you try to run with.

          This plus the displayed disdain for the greater society you’re intending to separate from indicates you will inherently be more likely to establish a cult under your model, be it Waco or Jim Jones, it will end up as a cult.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Voting is a system by which decisions are made by a large number of people. If you don’t have a voting system, you can’t have a functioning Society unless you have something like a dictatorship. Anarchism requires voting. Anarchists who pretend that everything needs to be done by absolute consensus are stupid, and are doomed to failure.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s why the people who’s ideology is reinforcing the current power structure and reverting it to even worse times are so hell bent on sabotaging the vote.

      Speaking against the tool of the proletariat to enact their will without having to fight a war for it every fucking time makes you nothing but a class traitor.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is literally the main tool by which further democratic rights have been obtained in those western democracies, contrary to your giveaway scare quotes.

          Be it by referenda, passage of law, or by constitutional amendment, every single advancement has been made through the organization of the proletariat as a voting block.

          Stop being a fucking class traitor because you don’t want to admit that sitting on your ass doesn’t send any kind of message other than that you have done nothing for the working class.

            • LeadersAtWork
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why are you downplaying voting? Yes, organizing strikes and many years ago larger movements created opportunities to pass monumental bills. Yet, there have been SO many laws and discussions since then that did not involve some form of violence or shutdown of some port. By voting together we can enact change. We create it through one voice. Even if our desires are different in the moment, we all want a better life. Why not take every advantage we can to make one?

  • style99@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    No offense, but if you hate democracy you really shouldn’t vote.

    • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “You hate democracy” -person who doesn’t understand how FPTP in our kind of democracy isn’t conducive to meaningful third-party voting without major voting reform

      If you want to vote third party, then maybe make sure that it’s viable first. Campaign in the long term, propose reform, gather grassroots support, etc. Simply voting third party in our current system does nothing.

      • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        THIS, 1,000%! Third Party doesn’t have a huge presence in the USA, only because people don’t do the work to get it there. It requires a lot of work that should be done just after the new sitting president is elected. Building a recognizable platform with proper support takes a lot of effort. It would be worth it, though, to truly support the people in ways which a two party system cannot. Holding the President and other people in power accountable with sensible words and meaningful action would get a party to gradually become a household name.

        After I vote for Kamala, this is what I will be looking into. Finding a third party (one with aims to support everyone, no matter gender, sexuality, etc).

        • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You should definitely add wealth class to your list of criteria, as this is a factor that both Dems and Reps fail to address.

          • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I should, it wasn’t the most immediate thought in my head; Republicans openly court the wealthy for donations, while most Dems (there are a few outspoken individuals that try) fail to curtail the power wealthy people have in US politics. Wealth Class is certainly a good addition to my list of criteria, as those who are less wealthy and are outright poor often have no voice in the political space. Unless they really create a proper spectacle which can’t be ignored.

    • Soup@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Says the person that loves democracy so much they refuse to either understand or accept that until third party candidate figure out how to make themselves viable, you are throwing away a vote.

      You all like to say ad nauseam- that it’s the democrats that need to show that they deserve your vote. But fail on every occasion to explain what any of the third party candidates have done to earn them.

      Especially when all of them provenly do jack shit three out of every four years.

      Now. I will patiently await your hasty lack of response.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I live in a state in this so-called democracy where my vote has literally no impact, I’m not voting for the Democrats because of their incessant warmongering.

        I’m not even in PSL but they’ve certainly not been doing “jack shit”, they’ve been very involved in antiwar protests since Iraq.

    • Rhoeri
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Please don’t advocate for people to not vote. Especially if you claim to not hate democracy.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s simple, if the candidate supports genocide I don’t vote for them. Should be a pretty easy and low bar to pass.