• Vinegar
    link
    fedilink
    35
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All too often I think the discussion misses the fact that there is no alternative to driving for the vast majority of US citizens. Busses, trains, walking, biking, etc are not viable options because US infrastructure & city planning overwhelmingly neglects everything but the automobile.

    It is supposedly a personal moral failing every time someone drives too old, too tired, or too impaired, but if trains, busses, & walking were the default ways to get around then this chronic societal problem would diminish dramatically. Incompetent driving is rooted in systemic failures, not personal moral ones.

    • VeganPizza69 ⓋOP
      link
      81 year ago

      The moral failing is that of personally encouraging, supporting or defending car dependency, along with the other more failing of not trying anything to reverse it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    In Germany drivers licenses issued before 2013 do not expire, meaning basically every senior would have to give up their license of their own accord. Spoiler: they generally keep driving, even when it’s abundantly clear that they shouldn’t.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Heck, I’d support regular testing for everyone. Laws change, best practices change and regular testing is a good way to keep most up to date. It would cost, be a hassle and extremely unpopular. But if it saves lives and/or make traffic softer it is worth it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    I recently saw some numbers, published by an automobile club, that suggested drivers over the age of 70 are involved in only 13% of crashes. My first thought was, that number is only that low because every other driver is already very cautious around old people in cars. And they usually drive rather slow. Still no reason to defend older people in death machines.

  • starlinguk
    link
    fedilink
    -31 year ago

    What are they going to do instead. Apparate?

    In the Netherlands you are tested every 5 years after the age of 70. So many people lose their licence and end up stuck in the middle of nowhere because there is no public transport and most affordable retirement homes have been shut down. So my dad, who is in his eighties and has passed his tests so far, drives around looking after them.

    • @RGB3x3
      link
      181 year ago

      Them not driving is a small inconvenience compared to the risk of killing themselves or someone else. Driving is not a right, it’s a privilege with real and dangerous consequences. The ability to do it safely needs to remain the most important factor when distributing licenses.

        • MeowdyPardner
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          That’s what we’re all about. We should build cities to allow alternative options besides cars

        • Pablo M.U. :vericol:
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          @Zana @RGB3x3 It’s quite funny how the whole premise of this sub/community is “it’s insane that driving cars is the main option for transportation in many places, we should strive for our cities/countries to build other, better, more sane options” but there’s always a comment in every post reminding us that there “aren’t any other options.”

    • Zyansheep
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I thought cities in the Netherlands were required to have public transit?