• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    143 minutes ago

    Whatever, I’m using it regardless of what shitty commercial alternatives tried to be shoved down my throat. If Draw.io goes shit I’ll just switch to ditaa

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    84 hours ago

    Just wondering, if a project switch to close source from open source, all the donation to the stage when it’s open source will be sent back to the donor or counted as shares?

    • @peregus
      link
      41 hour ago

      They count as…gone! Gone to develop what’s been open source until it becomes closed source. As I think it should be, because what you helped to develop with your donation is still there.

  • qaz
    link
    English
    13 hours ago

    deleted by creator

  • Aatube
    link
    fedilink
    2110 hours ago

    TL;DR: Competitors in integrating with Atlassian are not allowed to incorporate code after the change because they used it in free add-ons, which caused the official integration (a paid add-on that is the sole source of funding) to be labeled a scam by a review in late August.

    Plus, the thing was never really open source anyway:

    draw.io is also closed to contributions, as it’s not open source. We follow a development process compliant with our SOC 2 Type II process. We do not have a mechanism where we can accept contributions from non-staff members.

    • @peregus
      link
      31 hour ago

      Open source means that the source code is…open, that everyone can view and use it, it doesn’t mean that everyone can contribute to it. Or am I wrong?

      • chebra
        link
        fedilink
        138 minutes ago

        @peregus yes, wrong. Being “open” doesn’t mean just “readable”. Imagine an open bird cage, not just an open book. It needs to be open to fly free.

        • @peregus
          link
          031 minutes ago

          The definition of the worlds open source seems to me that the source is readable by everyone. If you mean something different like @[email protected] said, then that’s something else.

          • chebra
            link
            fedilink
            127 minutes ago

            @peregus why do you think so? My view is backed by the two official definitions from OSI and FSF, plus the wording of specific licenses. Your definition is backed by… linguistics? While ignoring the second (open cage) meaning of “open”? Quite strange narrow definition, don’t you think? And at odds with everyone who has been doing open-source for decades.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I don’t see a CLA so this is somewhat surprising that all ~30 contributors would be okay moving away from open source.

    Unless this was a unilateral decision

    • Aatube
      link
      fedilink
      1410 hours ago

      Apache is a permissive license, plus:

      draw.io is also closed to contributions, as it’s not open source. We follow a development process compliant with our SOC 2 Type II process. We do not have a mechanism where we can accept contributions from non-staff members.

      This was added wayyyy before. OP is making this much more of a deal than it actually is.

      • Fabian N. T. 🦆
        link
        fedilink
        29 hours ago

        @Aatube I don’t see how OP is making it a big deal. That post is merely stating facts, as confirmed by the company representative in the GitHub discussion. Yes, the project was never “open-source-like governed”, but it was technically open-source software. With the additional restriction in the license it’s not anymore. All pretty theorical, but nevertheless true.

        • Aatube
          link
          fedilink
          38 hours ago

          “No longer open source” is factually true. However, it gives the impression that they did something much more drastic. It would be much better to just get to the point with something like “draw.io forbids competitors for Atlassian integration from using their code”.

    • LalSalaamComrade
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2313 hours ago

      Not really - it can’t be used with Atlassian’s products, violating point 6 of the OSI definition - No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor.

    • Vik
      link
      English
      213 hours ago

      And despite that, if was still newsworthy enough to be posted like 6 times in total 😅

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        2013 hours ago

        I posted it to 8 communities because there are 8 communities I am aware of where this on-topic. Some people might be subscribed to only a subset of them. This is the natural consequence of the fediverse enabling us to have more than one community for discussing the same topic.

        • Vik
          link
          English
          5
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          I suppose some instances cut others off as well (I see only 6 total) so you have a fair point

        • Andrew
          link
          fedilink
          412 hours ago

          To my mind, the ideal would be that if you, as the person who wants to share some ‘open-source’ news, chose one community that you think is ‘best’ (based on what instance it’s on, if the mods are real people and are active, participation levels, whatever you think really). And we, as subscribers, would do the same. This way, the ‘good’ communities would thrive, and the ‘bad’ ones would wither away. What happens at the minute, is that there’s 8 communities for open source, and there’ll always will be, because they aren’t in competition with one another.

          (this is mostly just a general point about cross-posting behaviour, it’s not meant as a dig at you personally).

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            712 hours ago

            problem is I have no idea which of these communities is “best”, I do not pay enough attention to things going on behind the scenes to have any knowledge of that.

            • @Kelly
              link
              English
              06 hours ago

              problem is I have no idea which of these communities is “best”

              Its a bit basic but so far I’ve just gone with the largest population. Usually I’m just after the most activity and that generally scales with population. It keeps things relatively simple.