• halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Think about how funny it will be to watch his most devout followers embrace and defend his demented ramblings, though. To everyone else, it will be interesting to see the mental gymnastics they employ to try and convince others that he’s not losing his mind.

      When he gets lost and scared on his way to the podium, when he gets angry and starts getting super racist during interviews, when he soils himself during a visit to a foreign country. We’ll get to watch most of his followers erode, but there will be hardliners who will try to defend a literal dementia patient as some masterful gambit.

      Whether he wins or loses, we’ll be hearing about him for the rest of his life, and we’ll see his descent into mindlessness either way. We have a rare opportunity to put a literal mad man at the helm of a super power. This opportunity might not come again.

      • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 years ago

        He will die suddenly. It will likely be in the bathroom. The level of physical stress at his age should be as taxing as it appears to be. I’m sure he has a Sam Altmann/Lance Armstrong level of blood doping vampirism, but even that won’t save him IMO. How and when he dies may be important. He is a traitor. He should not be alive or a candidate for his coup.

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    My absolute favorite thing about this country is that nearly everyone votes for who the news networks tell them to vote for, even if the candidate is in clear cognitive decline.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m not voting for anyone. I’m voting against the fascist. You don’t think much of your fellow citizens, but then neither do I.

      • FlashMobOfOne
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        For most of this race it was between two candidates who clearly are in cognitive decline, and both sides insisted we all vote for their brain-damaged guy as a moral imperative, completely unironically.

        Then Kamala came along and for the first two months of her campaign, she insulted our intelligence by insisting we be joyful, when tens of millions of Americans are working 2-3 jobs just to fund the bare minimum of essential living needs. (And the polls seem to reflect how displeased people are with that.)

        You’re absolutely right that I don’t think much of my fellow citizens. What reasonable person could?

        • surewhynotlem
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Insisting we be joyful? Someone sure has main character syndrome. Some people ARE joyful about her. I’d that’s not you, that’s ok. But other people having hope is not an insistence that you join.

          All of which is irrelevant. This is America. You have two choices and vote for who you hate least. I’d you don’t vote, or vote third party, then implicitly you’ve voted for whoever you hate most. The system is rigged and you can’t escape it.

  • Asidonhopo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Assuming this trend continues and isn’t media cherrypicking an illusion to start a narratice, or just Trump being under the weather temporarily, would you rather have Trump as president in a diminished and confused state, or Vance as president after Trump leaves office due to the condition?

    • MimicJar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 years ago

      Vance as president after Trump leaves office due to the condition?

      For so many reasons Vance as president.

      First, there is a zero percent chance Trump gives up the presidency. So the more time can be spent infighting, embarrassing themselves and getting nothing done, the better.

      Second, Vance as president won’t have the same level of cult following him. If Vance pushes Trump out, he’ll make enemies. If Trump somehow leaves, the moment Vance fucks up the smallest thing, Trump will shit on him.

      Third, Vance doesn’t have the Trump “charisma”. Vance isn’t going to be able to convince people to follow his lead. Vance is a yes man, not a leader.

      Fourth, Anything Vance does, he has to take responsibility for. If Trump is “in charge” then Vance can always come along later and say “oh, I actually disagreed, but I trusted in Trump”. If Vance is in charge then he has to support his decisions. (And yes I know neither of them will actually take responsibility. Supporters won’t care. But the margins that decide elections will and that’s enough).


      Of course that’s all hypothetical and in the terrible future. Harris/Walz let’s us avoid that unnecessary pain and chaos.

      • Asidonhopo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean, which is preferable. Which do you think the country would survive more easily? I also would prefer neither but I find it helpful to imagine worst case scenarios out so I can try to prepare for them.

        • Snapz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          Nobody is entertaining your hypothetical. Neither.

          Don’t waste your time considering this nonsense. Vote.

  • Illegalmexicant
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh I’ve seen this one. It’s the Patriot’s vs the Stealers, He is just going to record a new trump item to sell. Maybe Trump beer?

    • morphballganon
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Why did you put an apostrophe in the Patriots, which is not possessive?

      Also it’s Steelers, not Stealers fyi.

      • CrazyLikeGollum
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 years ago

        I suspect they were trying to make a joke about how the MAGA people like to think they’re patriots fighting against the Democrats who stole the election.

        The apostrophe was probably a typo.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Con man pretending to be senile/crazy so he can’t stand trial for all his millions of crimes against Humanity & the US.

    • too_high_for_this
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      No way. His narcissism would never allow him to admit that he isn’t the smartest person ever. Just like how Ted Kaczynski refused to let his lawyer claim insanity.

      • Zier@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s true, he has a very huuuuge ego. But he likes to game the system, remember how proud he was that he didn’t have to pay taxes for years because of his casino bankruptcies? He thought that was a ‘smart’ thing to do. Anything that keeps him free and in money, he will do.

    • Gradually_Adjusting
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      He doesn’t seem clever enough for it to have been a sly allusion to “stop the steal”, I think he’s just lost it.

  • RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ok this is a bit reaching… He was just asking his people who’s job is to manage his time while on the trail. He’s on the tail end of the trail too. I think anyone would be having a hard time keeping up

  • Etterra
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    He’s gonna watch the Steelers play in 2007. Without a time machine.

  • morphballganon
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    He might have just said a team name he’s heard of to try to win points with the sports crowd. Arrogance, not dementia. My guess.

    • Clent
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      ⬆️ How to rationalize away dementia ⬆️

      • morphballganon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m sure dementia is happening, but this just sounds like arrogance