• @ccunningOP
    link
    341 month ago

    Alternate (More accurate) Headline:
    Washington Post editorial writers’ endorsement of Kamala Harris stopped by CEO

    “The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election,” wrote Will Lewis, The Post’s chief executive. “Nor in any future presidential election. We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates.”

    The Washington Post’s editorial writers had already drafted an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris for president, according to four people who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive newsroom matters.

          • Optional
            link
            11 month ago

            That’s all it ever was. Well, besides being a sick joke.

        • sp3ctr4l
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          Apparently so.

          The Onion’s ironic? slogan is ‘Twilight’s Last Gleaming’… which is now essentially a perfect parody of WaPo’s slogan, in that it is now 100% accurate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 month ago

    I was wondering how long Bezos would leave them to their devices. He’s been far more cautious about revealing his politics but Amazon’s frothing anti-union subterfuge speaks at least something for itself.

    He’s typically left WaPo alone, so I just wonder whether what’s changed is that Bezos feels the writing is on the wall. Maybe sensing a Trump victory, like the hyper rational alien he is, he decided blocking a Harris endorsement is the right move to position himself best for the post-democracy, oligarchical and fascist America on the horizon.

    • @dhork
      link
      English
      81 month ago

      He figures that if Trump wins, he will seek retribution, but if Harris wins, she will not seek retaliation at all. Which would you choose, if you had no morals and didn’t mind casual fascism as long as you get to keep your insane wealth?

  • sp3ctr4l
    link
    fedilink
    71 month ago

    Huh, that’s an interesting new Amazon User Policy update.

  • Optional
    link
    51 month ago

    Absolute 100% pure, uncut, organic, artisinal bullshit.

    Fuck the WaPo. Shit eating cowards.

  • TipRing
    link
    English
    31 month ago

    Our oligarchs are drooling over how much power they imagine gaining in a Trump presidency and will do everything they can to ensure the manipulible fascist wins so they can have the kleptocracy they have been dreaming of for years.

    • @Sanctus
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      And they’ll keep dreaming about it right on out the 3rd story window if he does win.

      • TipRing
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        “But I didn’t do anything wrong!” - Last thoughts of a fascist oligarch.

  • Media Bias Fact CheckerB
    link
    -21 month ago
    The New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The New York Times:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The New York Times is generally reliable. WP:RSOPINION should be used to evaluate opinion columns, while WP:NEWSBLOG should be used for the blogs on The New York Times’s website. The 2018 RfC cites WP:MEDPOP to establish that popular press sources such as The New York Times should generally not be used to support medical claims.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/25/business/media/washington-post-presidential-endorsement.html?unlocked_article_code=1.U04.NYTO._LhIjylYYLB7&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb&ngrp=mnp

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support