Why would Musk do this? It seems notable that one of Musk’s heroes is the current president of Argentina, Javier Milei, who has been credited with taking a “chainsaw” to the nation’s government. Milei, an avowed “free market,” “anti-woke” libertarian, took office in December of 2023, and has instituted what he calls an “austerity” budget, characterized by economic “shock treatment.” This strategy has involved making deep cuts to government spending on social welfare programs, devaluing the peso, and cutting thousands of government jobs, all in the hope of some vague libertarian glowup in the near to far future.

  • @someguy3
    link
    62 hours ago

    He’s suddenly worried about the deficit afaik. So to balance the budget while giving massive tax breaks to billionaires means people will suffer. Because free market or something.

  • @aseriesoftubes
    link
    434 hours ago

    After the mass deportations, all of the most fervent deportation enthusiasts should be required to work in the fields to compensate for the depleted agricultural sector.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      204 hours ago

      Ha. Reminds me of my favorite Bob the Angry Flower comic:

  • @danc4498
    link
    English
    1267 hours ago

    Billionaires profit SO much from a tanked economy. Everybody else is fucked, but all the toys they want to buy go on sale. Namely competitors.

    • @gAlienLifeform
      link
      42
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Sure is a weird coincidence how we’ve had recessions after the last 3 or 4 Republican presidents /s

      • @danc4498
        link
        English
        485 hours ago

        And Biden gets blamed for Trump’s economy while Trump is celebrated for Obama’s economy. Fuck is wrong with people.

        • Billiam
          link
          22 hours ago

          I used to have a boss who likes to credit Obama’s economy to Bush, saying that presidential economic policies take 4-8 years to be felt.

          Didn’t have much to say about why Bush I’s economy sucked though, for some reason.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 hours ago

          Fuck is wrong with people.

          They’re all too busy believing the loudest person in a suit that they can find.

          Surely being loud in a suit means what you say is important, right? The louder the more important… and look at how long that tie is. Surely that’s the bestest person to listen to.

        • @gAlienLifeform
          link
          165 hours ago

          I mean, that’s the natural result of Biden’s reluctance to blame Republicans for anything and all his efforts to work with them and praise them whenever they do anything remotely positive, and now Harris can’t stop bragging about all the endorsements she got from Republicans who helped set these cycles up in the past. It’s totally predictable that a lot of people are confused and just think “politicians” are to blame when we have Dems like this.

          • @danc4498
            link
            English
            74 hours ago

            Yeah, this is true. Biden crossed aisles. Obama used a super majority to fix healthcare in a bipartisan manner. And this resulted in Democrats getting smacked by republicans for over a decade. Even though it was a bipartisan effort!

  • @breadsmasher
    link
    English
    1058 hours ago

    Musk, who was talking about reducing the national debt

    so why is he supporting an ex president who blew the national debt up beyond anyone that came before?

    • @Red_October
      link
      124 hours ago

      Well there’s the problem, you seem to think that things like basic pattern recognition and an understanding of basic reality are involved in someone deciding they like Trump.

    • @ChicoSuave
      link
      84 hours ago

      Trump overspends because he doesn’t know the value of money. Elon wants money and the government has the most of it. Starlink is a government funding machine that soaks up all the space budget. But NASA has been bearing the brunt of budget cuts each year since they retired the STS shuttle, so Elon wants that defense budget via the NRO. Trump founded the Space Corps and believes in the vague idea of “space is future” that Elon pumps out and will overspend trying to make that happen. Elon’s plan is to directly receive government money.

      Trump is so dumb as to not understand details, easily persuaded, and has unlimited money that Elon sees him as the best way to get space seed money.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        60 minutes ago

        Trump overspends because he doesn’t know the value of money.

        Trump “overspends” because he doesn’t understand the concept of actually paying a bill.

        He’s spent all his life refusing to pay a single bill, and somehow getting away with it.

        It doesn’t matter if the money is his or the government’s (until he steals it). He won’t pay. If he has anything remotely resembling principles, not paying is his main one.

        He’s as capable of intentionally paying a bill as he is of growing a second head. Or bigger hands.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      508 hours ago

      Oh he still wants to reduce the national debt. In specific, he wants to reduce the debt he has to several nations.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    577 hours ago

    Somebody doesn’t want his government contracts and subsidies to be ended.

    I hope Harris wins so this asshole gets absolutely destroyed and deported.

    • @Coreidan
      link
      English
      75 hours ago

      It matters not who the president is. Elon musk is in the rich boys club. Ain’t nothing will happen to him. The best we can do is hope for a disease to take him out.

    • @ahoneybun
      link
      147 hours ago

      The US that was mostly funding SpaceX should have access to most of the parents that I’m sure they have if they are funding it. It’s wild that a lot of the work that could benefit the future generation that was funded by the current generations is owned by a corporation.

      • @9point6
        link
        287 hours ago

        99% of their “innovation” comes from pubic sector academia or stuff NASA already figured out anyway.

        IMO SpaceX shouldn’t have exclusive rights to any of it, really

        The only thing they’re really bringing to the table is money. NASA could be doing exactly the same stuff if the government actually treated it as a priority.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 hours ago

          “the only thing they’re bringing to the table is money” is true of every single capitalist and every single private company.

          We and our ancestors worked the land, built the machines, invented the innovations, increased our collective productivity, but a tiny fraction of people currently alive call dibs and lay claim to everything.

          When we ask for dignity and the bare necessities of life, not what we’re owed but just what we need to survive, they throw tantrums and threaten to leave.

          Let them leave, “capital flight” is only a problem if we care about capital. We workers produce and design and construct and deliver and maintain every single fucking thing, we are the economy. Let them leave.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 hours ago

            Honestly, “capital flight” is great. Cause the truth about it is the money leaves, but all the actually productive capital stays. The buildings, the land, the machinery, the infrastructure etc etc. Everything the owning class privately owned, stays. They can’t take a hospital, or a naval yard, or a factory, with them when they go 😂

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 hours ago

              Exactly! It’s an empty threat in isolation. Of course the real threat is that you’ll get embargoed or otherwise undergo economic violence as capitalist owned governments around the world try to make an example of you.

              Generally though, capitalist fleeing just means less to take care of when we reclaim our freedom as workers, especially if you prefer non-violence

          • @forrcaho
            link
            24 hours ago

            Yeah, money is a social construct; it’s really just numbers in computers. We can redefine capital to be numbers that actually make sense … uh, theoretically.

    • nyahlathotep
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 hours ago

      He has US citizenship, at least according to wikipedia. Much as I hate him the government can’t just revoke that afaik

      • Maestro
        link
        fedilink
        177 hours ago

        It has been proven he lied and violated his visa when he first came to the U.S. Can they revoke citizenship over that?

        • @wjrii
          link
          English
          12 hours ago

          To take your question seriously, yes, virtually the only way to deprive an American of citizenship is if an immigrant lied on their application in a way that would have made them ineligible for that citizenship. It’s extremely rare, often hard to prove, and generally not worth the trouble, plus risks creating a stateless person who could instead just be prosecuted for fraud, but it does happen.

          Guess which president considered weaponizing it in his first term?

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          137 hours ago

          Might be able to over providing aid to an enemy.

      • The Pantser
        link
        47 hours ago

        No but we have many many open prison cells that he could move into

  • @xc2215x
    link
    116 hours ago

    Musk will be fine if he does.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25 hours ago

    Sounds like the plot from any spy movie where the bad guy wants to nuke the planet in order for a more perfect civilization to be born out of the rubble. Which is to say, I think we can all acknowledge there is some truth to the statement.

    However, the rest of us rational thinkers might choose to prioritize other economic and legislative means before wiping out everyone but those who could survive a global disaster in their sub or extra terrestrial bunkers.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      45 hours ago

      The fun thing is that the rich tech bros who think they can ride out The Big One in their bunkers are aware that their security staff would have no fealty to them once money is no longer worth anything and they can’t figure out what to do about it… but some of the ideas they’ve come up with are hilarious, like exploding collars or locking up the food and hiding the key.

      Elon and Zuckerberg and the others would be shot in the head by their security chief the second that person realizes that they’re no longer being paid.

    • @aesthelete
      link
      0
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Sounds like the plot from any spy movie where the bad guy wants to nuke the planet in order for a more perfect civilization to be born out of the rubble. Which is to say, I think we can all acknowledge there is some truth to the statement.

      Except there’s no proof, let alone a guarantee, that out of the destruction that “a more perfect civilization” will be born. So, sorry, no. There’s no truth here to be acknowledged.