Ukraine’s U.N. Ambassador Sergiy Kyslytsya responded: “None of the countries that provide assistance to Ukraine is under Security Council sanctions.” “Receiving assistance from the fully-sanctioned North Korea is a brazen violation of the U.N. Charter,” he added. “Sending the DPRK troops to support Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine is a flagrant violation of international law.”
If sometime like the US or multiple EU countries decided to go boots on the ground in Ukraine, what would be an expected response from the region/Russian allies?
I can’t imagine China would want to get directly involved, but maybe I’m wrong. Everyone outside looking in can see that Russia isn’t a super power without the threat of nukes. Who would want to risk everything to support someone like that? What would be the benefit of these different countries to try and intervene on Russian behalf?
It’s probably more simple, like, everyone in that area hates the US, which in itself might be enough reason to get involved. I’m just curious what’s the general consensus is on this.
So russia finally admits it needs help. What a weak and pathetic country.
Fuckin go for it. Not like anyone is doing much of anything about Russia violating international law up to this point. The survivors will be able to tell their people about US weaponry and how hard it fucks.
International law is an honor system. Who’s gonna enforce it? Blue helmeted troops? How effective is that?
if dprk provides russia ten thousand of their finest soldiers for deployment on the front lines; and dprk surely expects no retaliation of any kind from anyone for that action.
then…
allies or supporting nations of ukraine should also be able to offer and provide to afu, ten thousand of their own; again without any retaliation directed towards their homelands by anyone for that action.
North Korean and Iran have been helping Russia for a while. The new development is having North Korean troops on the ground. Is Russia suggesting, its fair for west to help Ukraine with troops?
The gall would be impressive, were it not so infuriating
Reuters - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Reuters:
Wiki: reliable - Reuters is a news agency. There is consensus that Reuters is generally reliable. Syndicated reports from Reuters that are published in other sources are also considered generally reliable. Press releases published by Reuters are not automatically reliable.
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United Kingdom
Search topics on Ground.News