Techie to TechnologyEnglish · 2 years agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square88linkfedilinkarrow-up1798arrow-down114cross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnologyprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1784arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie to TechnologyEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square88linkfedilinkcross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnologyprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squareKayn@dormi.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down10·2 years ago Using a chromium fork also means you accept that google will dictate standards less harmful than web integrity. Are these condescending statements how you intend to get people to switch to Firefox?
Are these condescending statements how you intend to get people to switch to Firefox?