- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Troops revel in the destruction they have caused in southern towns and villages, joking about a blown-up mosque and torched hospital
Legal experts have previously warned that videos posted by Israeli soldiers could breach international law, and an Al Jazeera documentary revealed that their TikToks could amount to war crimes.
You must log in or register to comment.
Most ethical army
I’m in Canada … and our government is sending money, arms and support for this stupidity?
No this stupidity you get for free
I doubt this comment is for anyone reading but:
If you support this, you are a bad person, a literal caricature villain.
Israel is a disgusting terrorist shithole.
Brb, gonna torch a synagogue and post a review as I listen to women and children burn.
I’m not, because I’m not a fucking demon.
I hope there is a hell.
Let them doxx themselves and support the Hind Rajab Foundation which is trying to get individual legal proceedings on them, especially the dual citizens: https://www.hindrajabfoundation.org/
Christ.
I really would love to be able to tag this kind of beings capable of such actions in a way that I can recognise them when I find them out there in person, not for violence of any kind against them, a % of humans are alike and may be useful for certain tasks, but to take informed decision about with whom prioritise my altruism or any social collective benefit: I may share this planet with them, but I will never call them my people.
Anybody who associates with organized religion is one bad leader away from doing this shit.
Really not gonna point out that tank photo is AI generated? Makes me doubt the source…
Everyone (including well known and legitimate news outlets) and ’is mummie is slapping AI images on articles, posts, comments and Lemmy communities nowadays. IIRC even The Register on their “baguette” article.
Doesn’t make it okay. Frankly any news organization peddling that shit without an obvious disclaimer should be considered suspect.
And I agree, it doesn’t. It’s just that you can’t properly judge quality of an article by the presence of an AI generated image (anymore).
They just don’t want anybody to think they’re cool.
