We have to look on optimistic side 😁

  • @PugJesus
    link
    English
    1463 months ago

    I don’t think you understand what the vice president does.

    • @disguy_ovahea
      link
      64
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Right. Even if she were President, there isn’t a single change that she could make that couldn’t be immediately undone by Trump and a Republican Congress in January.

      • @kopasz7
        link
        -5
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Try un-eating a cake, or undoing corporal punishment. My point is, not all things are reversible.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          63 months ago

          Now I imagined Harris spanking Trump while stuffing her face with cake, so thanks for the visual I guess.

        • @disguy_ovahea
          link
          3
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Biden could pardon prisoners or charged individuals without Trump’s say. He could also provide additional funding to Ukraine and Taiwan. I can’t think of any other action by a Presidential Executive Order or Congressional legislation that can’t be changed by another President or Congress.

          • @kopasz7
            link
            13 months ago

            Military actions, release of information, establishing precedent of executive power etc.

            These are just some categories, there are many fundamentally irreversible actions.

            • @disguy_ovahea
              link
              13 months ago

              Release of information is a good one that I missed.

              Military actions are immediately reversible by the Commander-In-Chief, and the President doesn’t define or control the executive power held by the office. That’s determined by SCOTUS’s interpretation of the Constitution.

              • @kopasz7
                link
                13 months ago

                Do we have the tech to revive people or unbomb something? I believe military actions are very hard to reverse if we are talking beyond the administrative.

                • @disguy_ovahea
                  link
                  13 months ago

                  I misunderstood. I thought you meant munitions support or troop deployment.

    • Jesus
      link
      443 months ago

      Or how Congress works.

    • Ioughttamow
      link
      fedilink
      203 months ago

      Well, she makes it ok to elect a child rapist. Oh wait, my mistake, that was the electorate. Yes the electorate, everyone who didn’t vote for Kamala, just rewarded a child rapist.

  • @Blue_Morpho
    link
    1023 months ago

    She’s the Vice President, not the President. Nor is the House, where bills start, have a Democrat majority.

    Biden, on the other hand, could shoot the Supreme Court justices and it would be perfectly legal.

      • @dariusj18
        link
        253 months ago

        Keep shooting until the justices find him guilty

        • @Alwaysnownevernotme
          link
          63 months ago

          Fuck it. Just keep shooting. Just appointing SCJ’s en masse one after another, cheyney, bush, fuck it Trump why not, get Gingrich and O’Reilly, just running down the list. A terrifying image of a line of black robed hooded politicos being shuffled down an excrement strewn hallway by secret service agents. hearing each other take their oaths in front of dark Brandon in a marble throne. Spitting and sputtering their pathetic last words. A millisecond accurate timer counts down 70 days behind him as he eats vanilla ice cream cones in sunglasses. Kamala sits by his side with a hairless cat in her lap. The footage is broadcasted internationally via a single gopro mounted to a gold plated AR-15 with an anime girl front ironsight.

        • @nul9o9
          link
          43 months ago

          This is the way.

    • Kalkaline
      link
      fedilink
      103 months ago

      It’s only legal according to the Supreme Court for Trump.

      • @AngryRobot
        link
        23 months ago

        They csnt pass judgmental if they’re dead.

    • @PugJesus
      link
      English
      73 months ago

      Biden, on the other hand, could shoot the Supreme Court justices and it would be perfectly legal.

      Unfortunately, even if he wasn’t spineless, that wouldn’t do us much good considering the incoming president.

      • @njm1314
        link
        173 months ago

        Well frankly I think the Heritage Foundation represents a clear and present threat to the United States security so you know that might actually help a lot

    • @disguy_ovahea
      link
      23 months ago

      That won’t matter either. With a fully Republican controlled Congress, I’m absolutely expecting them to expand and pack the Supreme Court this term.

    • @LifeInMultipleChoice
      link
      120 days ago

      It wouldn’t be “legal” he would just be immune from prosecution for such after leaving his post

  • @Telodzrum
    link
    223 months ago

    This meme speaks to a level of civic education from which we can draw a direct line to electing authoritarians like Trump.

    • @LifeInMultipleChoice
      link
      1
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Businesses. Oops, I mean the people the businesses pay to write them… Wait, aren’t those just contract labor? So yeah businesses