• @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
    link
    52 days ago

    "I don’t get it. I keep getting applications from LinkedIn and they are all nazis. Every. Single. One of them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    252 days ago

    Conspiracy theory time. He didn’t buy twitter to turn a profit, he did it to control the headlines. For which, he is getting great value for money

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Reminder: He was forced to buy Twitter by a judge and was doing everything he could to avoid buying Twitter.

      He is using it to control the headlines, but that’s not the reason he bought it. The reason he bought it is that he was forced to. He wanted to back out of the deal.

      • @zeppo
        link
        English
        42 days ago

        That doesn’t make any sense because he was the one who offered to buy it in the first place. He signed binding contract to purchase it, then tried to back out prob not because he didn’t want it, but he realized he was overpaying. He has obviously loved owning Twitter as far as the attention and social power he gained.

        He should have paid the $1 billion to back out and made another offer, but he’s sleazy, prideful, stingy and stubborn and wanted to back out for free by employing bullshit excuses and lawyers.

        • @Hugin
          link
          22 days ago

          He was trying to do a pump and dump. Buy shares, say he is going to buy at a huge premium, sell when the price shots up. He had already done something similar.

          Twitter said they would take the deal and the SEC said follow through or go to jail. So he borrowed heavily against his Tesla stock to buy Twitter at the ridiculous price.

          Twitter didn’t make enough to pay the interest even before he ran it into the ground. So he has to keep his creditors happy. Saudi Arabia is one if the big ones and they hated people being able to say whatever they wanted on twitter.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 days ago

          IIRC he made a joke offer to buy it in a Tweet at a certain price per share (that was ridiculously high) and because he was literally just sanctioned by the FCC for market manipulation his joke had to become a reality in order for him to avoid serious penalties (the FCC was DONE with his shit at this point).

          Everything since then has just been off his dome. Obviously it’s pretty bad up in there since it’s just a roaring money fire ATM.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You can make the argument that something was the reason he originally made the offer to buy Twitter, but that seems separate to me.

          If I talk to friends about wanting to dye my hair pink as a joke, then they propose a bet making me do it if I lose, I lose and do it, then the reason my hair is pink is that I lost a bet, not whatever I originally suggested.

          If I eat something I don’t like because there is nothing else in the fridge, the reason I’m eating it is that there is nothing else in the fridge, not whatever reason is there for it to be in the fridge in the first place (a visiting friend left it behind).

          In all cases, the situation was created by some other event, and in Twitter’s case, there was an original reason he made the offer, but it did not end up being the reason he bought it, because he wouldn’t have bought it otherwise.

          That’s how I see it.

          • @zeppo
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            He spent billions of dollars to buy 9% of Twitter, was offered a board seat, it didn’t work out, then he made a formal offer. This apparently followed some drug soaked night at Larry Ellison’s, but it was never a joke. Maybe a Schrodinger’s joke.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I never said it was a joke. He fully intended to buy Twitter, then decided he doesn’t want to buy it, but was forced to do it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 days ago

        That was because it was a good deal at the initial price be proposed, but the price went to shit and he tried to get a better price

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1193 days ago

    After the election win, I am no longer that certain in how bad of an investment Twitter was for Musk.

    It probably helped the Trump campaign somehow, even if not decisive.

    And he will probably get billions in AI subsidies which he will partially spend on licensing Twitter content for AI purposes.

    • @NOT_RICK
      link
      English
      533 days ago

      Yeah he didn’t buy a social media site, he bought a propaganda platform

      • stebo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 days ago

        and the difference between this one and truth social is you don’t have to advertise it to get people to join, since half the population was already on it anyway and most people are too stubborn to leave

        • @NOT_RICK
          link
          English
          93 days ago

          I have a friend that complains about Twitter non stop but refuses to leave. I mock him every time he brings it up.

          • Laurel Raven
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 days ago

            BlueSky is a viable alternative, if they find Mastodon too crunchy/not populous enough

          • ...m...
            link
            fedilink
            12 days ago

            …you should mock anyone who links to xitter; it only succeeds on the basis of their patronage…

    • @chalupapocalypse
      link
      573 days ago

      This was the point all along, it gave too much power the individuals and now he can manipulate it

      He didn’t lose money, he just bought a propaganda machine. His image of being a dumb meme man may be mostly true but it’s also a perfect cover for fuckery

    • @zeppo
      link
      English
      22 days ago

      He did overpay. He could have gotten it for cheaper. Considering how much money he has though, and the other primary investors being the Saudis, it didn’t matter much.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      183 days ago

      I used to laugh really hard about that shit as well, but I was apparently just not seeing that the guy was buying an election. I guess I just think too small.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate
    link
    English
    553 days ago

    I used to think Elon was just an idiot for buying Twitter and running it into the ground, but now I wonder if he was completely successful in buying a giant megaphone and making sure it only broadcast his pro-Trump propaganda. What does he care if it’s not making as much money?

  • @joker125
    link
    English
    112 days ago

    Musk hedged on turning America into an oligarchy. Will it work? Who knows. However his plan has been to elect a dictator as US president, one that will intentionally crash the US economy so he and his other billionaire buddies can come in and buy every industry for pennies on the dollar.

    So thankful for all single issues voters who always fall for the same old shit, over and over again.

    Congrat on your signaling. I hope you feel better while begging in bread lines.

  • @rockSlayer
    link
    503 days ago

    Microsoft is already working on it

      • @Ziglin
        link
        English
        63 days ago

        Does nothing for me :>

        Why would I need a LinkedIn hotkey?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 days ago

          Pebcak. I have a feeling you’re not truly pressing the windows button :)

          Doesn’t everyone? Microsoft seems to think so.

          • @Ziglin
            link
            English
            32 days ago

            I’m assuming you mean the super key that some operating systems decided to reuse under a different name.

            And uh yes I did press it but why would I use an OS with such a bloated default config? Setting up Hyprland was fun :> (but I never did add that hotkey lol).

  • @Wild_Mastic
    link
    27
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Uninstalled it a couple months ago, it’s completely useless and just filled with ad spam post of companies I don’t fucking care.

    Also, the fake job seeking messages you get daily and never respond after you contact them back.

    • @ArdMacha
      link
      12 days ago

      Did you delete your account? That was the smart move, the day before he bought it

  • @CliveRosfield
    link
    English
    183 days ago

    I don’t think it was a bad purchase after he succeeded in electing Trump.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 days ago

      Nope. His major companies rely on government funding and regulation, and now he’s going to be whatever it was called for Trump. A cool 44 billion to actually control parts of government?

      • @CliveRosfield
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        They’re indirectly in his pocket. And in my view paying 44 billion to control parts of a government in the most powerful country in existence is nothing to scoff at.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        63 days ago

        Sort of, but they also benefit from tariffs and lower regulation:

        • Tesla - don’t have to cut prices if your competitors have to raise theirs; also, less regulation on cars means he can get to market faster
        • SpaceX - oversight on rocket launches costs money
        • xAI - slashing regulations on AI helps this new company
        • Neuralink - again, regulations are a major limitation here

        He is also big into cryptocurrencies, so he stands to gain there as well.

        All in all, there’s a good chance he makes his $44B back by having Trump’s ear and being able to encourage certain changes over others.

      • @bitchkat
        link
        English
        22 days ago

        He’s going to be in charge of Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 days ago

      This is giving him way too much credit, thinking he’s some mastermind who engineered this whole thing. He’s very wealthy and addicted with twitter, and started amassing a lot of shares of the company. He didn’t really care to own it, and instead tried seeing if he could sway Twitter to benefit him, namely by trying to ban the Elonjet account. That didn’t work, so he used his classic 420 joke to say he’s going to buy Twitter for $54.20 per share, which was way above market rates. He had to be literally sued to purchase the company, after trying to get out of the deal.

      Once he was forced to buy the company, it was the company that assumed the debts, not Elon, so it immediately was performing terribly, and Elon had to cut costs, firing employees, not paying rent and server costs, etc. Nothing was planned out ahead of time, the company is flying by the seat of its pants. And arguably the second most prominent user of the platform, the next President, has a competing platform and is directly invested in seeing that succeed, not Twitter/X.

      If anything, both Elon and Trump are the modern epitome of failing upwards, exploiting the labor and systems in place to protect Americans, just so they can make more money for themselves. The fact they’re celebrated as much as they are is disgusting.

  • @kerrypacker
    link
    243 days ago

    But then where will we find out what distant colleagues did 7 weeks ago?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      63 days ago

      I can’t begin my day without seeing a company I used to work for years ago catered bbq for a customer 3 weeks ago. Complete with pictures of the food and handing out of company branded hats, “we do it the (company name) way!”

    • @Glitterbomb
      link
      13 days ago

      My occupation includes a ton of boomer field techs. Literally all they do on LinkedIn is hit like on every photo the HR/marketing women post of themselves. It’s miserable, I don’t think they realize that like gets shared with me. As in, I would have never seen this random photo of a woman in a booth somewhere if they didn’t hit like. So my feed is a flood of creepy dudes liking pictures of women, and then an ad for Cisco. I could go back to Facebook if I wanted this.

  • @expatriado
    link
    103 days ago

    LinkedIn only exist for me when looking for a job, definately not a place to stay, i am alergic to toxic positivity

  • @ArdMacha
    link
    22 days ago

    Is LinkedIn not already a pile of total shite?

    • @Mango
      link
      12 days ago

      Nooooo, I use that so effectively at work! I’m a QA director.

    • @jaybone
      link
      53 days ago

      Then what will we use?

      I admit I kind of miss bugzilla.

  • @auzy
    link
    53 days ago

    Not too worried by LinkedIn.

    At this point of time though, Facebook is as toxic as truth social, so happy to see that destroyed so s real competitor can replace it