We’ll see what happens in 2025, of course.

  • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
    link
    172 days ago

    These dumbasses. Can they read the first fucking sentence? They quote it all the time, maybe try reading it. It says

    “We the people…”

    Not

    “We the people and invisible dieties…”

    Nobody is coming down from on high to save us. It’s only us to solve every problem.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      52 days ago

      They like to point out the religious language in the Declaration of Independence as if it’s a legal document, which it is not.

  • @NateNate60
    link
    47
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The story is much more enlightening, and frankly, more educational than this meme projects. Yes, it’s correct, at least on a surface level, but there’s also the reason they decided to create a secular state. Namely, even though they were all, broadly speaking, Christians or Christian-inspired deists, they also recognised that Christianity came in hundreds of different flavours, not all of which are agreeable. They recognised that a religious state would have to pick a side in all of the hundreds of different spats that Christians have gone through over the most minute details of their dogma. Furthermore, they also realised that a state is most fragile when it is just founded, and thus, to survive, the state would have to have as much support as possible. Pretty much everyone was at least begrudgingly satisfied with a secular state.

    You see, if they had created a religious country, they could not guarantee that it would stay loyal to whatever interpretation they had settled on. Future governments could, if they were able to, could easily “reinterpret” the state dogma to whatever they wanted. They understood that if the Government had the power to meddle in religious affairs, it was only a matter of time before someone whose religion was not agreeable to take over and start doing things that you don’t like, justifying it with their religion.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 days ago

      Namely, even though they were all, broadly speaking, Christians

      The majority of the founders were deists.

      https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Founding-Fathers-Deism-and-Christianity-1272214

      Although orthodox Christians participated at every stage of the new republic, Deism influenced a majority of the Founders. The movement opposed barriers to moral improvement and to social justice. It stood for rational inquiry, for skepticism about dogma and mystery, and for religious toleration. Many of its adherents advocated universal education, freedom of the press, and separation of church and state. If the nation owes much to the Judeo-Christian tradition, it is also indebted to Deism, a movement of reason and equality that influenced the Founding Fathers to embrace liberal political ideals remarkable for their time.

      it was only a matter of time before someone whose religion was not agreeable to take over and start doing things that you don’t like

      Not just a disagreeable religion, but any religion.

      https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/establishment-clause-separation-of-church-and-state/

      Both Jefferson and fellow Virginian James Madison felt that state support for a particular religion or for any religion was improper. They argued that compelling citizens to support through taxation a faith they did not follow violated their natural right to religious liberty. The two were aided in their fight for disestablishment by the Baptists, Presbyterians, Quakers, and other “dissenting” faiths of Anglican Virginia.

      The christo-fascist MAGA movement is not consistent with the origins of our nation and the Constitution despite originalists claims to the contrary. We are not a christian nation, but a secular nation. All religions, including Christianity, were deemed dangerous to mix with the government.

      I’m sure you didn’t mean anything by it in your argument, but these misconceptions are what the MAGA movement will use to push christian nationalism on all of us and to exclude people based on their faith or lack of faith.

      • @NateNate60
        link
        72 days ago

        In the context of the Government subscribing to a particular religion, I use the word “religion”, but I guess I really mean “religious belief”, i.e. a belief about religion, in the broadest sense. I would consider deism to be a religious belief under that definition.

        So to reiterate my point, if you, the designer of a system of government, allow the state to hold and enforce a religious belief of any kind, eventually a government will take power which holds a different religious belief, and use the state"s ability to deal with religious matters to enforce their different belief upon the people. And this will inevitably happen. So the best protection you can design against this is to withhold this power from the state by explicitly declaring it to be secular.

  • @Maggoty
    link
    31 day ago

    I read the Constitution in my Bible, so obviously the founding fathers intended this country to be Christian, modeled after the godly mega churches.

  • EleventhHour
    link
    212 days ago

    Over 250 years ago, when the country was founded, the founders knew better than to believe the hucksterism of religion.

    It’s very frustrating that most people, even today, cannot get past the hucksterism of religion.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -3
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      No, the founders were mostly Christians religious too. They just knew better than to trust Christian dogmatic spats not to endanger the stability of their infant country.

      Edit to correct my mistake about them being Christian and to clarify: I’m not claiming the US is Christian in origin. It explicitly isn’t, but not because the founding fathers “didn’t believe”. Deism is still the believe in some supernatural force, even if it presents itself as a more rational form, and not all of them even were deists. They just believed it would be better to separate their individual religious convictions from the mutual political ambition.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
          link
          -2
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Not correct and that article doesn’t say what you said it does. It says of the 56 founders only one was ordained clergy. Okay.

          Whatever their beliefs, the Founders came from similar religious backgrounds. Most were Protestants. The largest number were raised in the three largest Christian traditions of colonial America—Anglicanism (as in the cases of John Jay, George Washington, and Edward Rutledge), Presbyterianism (as in the cases of Richard Stockton and the Rev. John Witherspoon), and Congregationalism (as in the cases of John Adams and Samuel Adams). Other Protestant groups included the Society of Friends (Quakers), the Lutherans, and the Dutch Reformed. Three Founders—Charles Carroll and Daniel Carroll of Maryland and Thomas Fitzsimmons of Pennsylvania—were of Roman Catholic heritage.

          The sweeping disagreement over the religious faiths of the Founders arises from a question of discrepancy. Did their private beliefs differ from the orthodox teachings of their churches? On the surface, most Founders appear to have been orthodox (or “right-believing”) Christians. Most were baptized, listed on church rolls, married to practicing Christians, and frequent or at least sporadic attenders of services of Christian worship. In public statements, most invoked divine assistance.

          https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Founding-Fathers-Deism-and-Christianity-1272214

          You can argue about how devout they were and we can never know their sincere inner belief, but you cannot say they were not majority Christian. Even the ones people point to as deists were largely raised Christian. I’m glad they were not so deranged as to make religion a part of the new government, and that they had the wisdom to write the First Amendment, the one through which all others flow, in such a way as to prohibit establishment and grant free exercise. They definitely didn’t want religious dogma to play any role in governing and rightly so but it is simply not correct to say that they were other than mostly Christian in their private religious lives.

          None of them were Jewish. Three of them were Catholic. What else do you think they were if not Christian?

          You cite Thomas Jefferson as an example, but actually he was Christian too. The actual title of “The Jefferson Bible” you cited as evidence of his non-christianity is “The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth.”

          About it, he wrote “A more beautiful or precious morsel of ethics I have never seen; it is a document in proof that I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus.”

          • EleventhHour
            link
            2
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            This is, of course, bullshit.

            Take your superstitious make believe somewhere else.

            Blocked

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
              link
              12 days ago

              Wtf are you talking about now. You got called out and proven to have no idea what you’re talking about. Yeah block me and retreat into your little safe bubble.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 day ago

            That’s not what I said though. I said they were Christian, which your link suggests would be an error, but more on the order of a misunderstanding than bullshit. But I didn’t say it was a Christian nation, nor do I think so. I’m aware they intentionally separated church and state, I’m just saying it wasn’t some enlightenend act of atheistic disdain for religion. They weren’t atheists. They just weren’t theocrats either.

            • EleventhHour
              link
              12 days ago

              I’m sorry you insist on ignoring the fact. Therefore, I’m disregarding everything you ever will say.

  • @disguy_ovahea
    link
    152 days ago

    They did however include 30 years of protected slave trade as an unamendable right.

    So they still have that in common.

    • @P00ptart
      link
      02 days ago

      This wasn’t beneficial at the time, and isn’t to this day. Name one time when pointing out hypocrisy has changed a single mind.

      • @disguy_ovahea
        link
        22 days ago

        Hypocrisy? Instructions on how to properly conduct slave trade are detailed in Leviticus.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I read a lot of Goosebumps and Stephen King when I was a kid. You don’t see me trying to start a government by gluing masks on people and feeding blood to cars. Some people appear capable of reading things without acting upon it and punishing their constituents.

  • @NicolaHaskell
    link
    -62 days ago

    If it’s not supposed to be the church then why is the prevailing ideology around here “store brand catholic social theory”?

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      22 days ago

      Because it is not what it is supposed to be.

      • @NicolaHaskell
        link
        -62 days ago

        If it’s not what it’s supposed to be then why is all the messaging around here basically “capitalism=bad, distributism=good”? Ascetic veganism routinely wins out as morally superior to mercantilism on this platform, suppressing Siddhartha’s exit from the woods.

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          42 days ago

          I have no idea what you’re talking about. It wasn’t supposed to be because the founder’s writings and the Constitution says so. Not to mention the never-repealed Barbary treaties which make it explicit that the United States is in no way a Christian country.

          You don’t seem to understand the difference between “supposed to be” and “is.”

          • @NicolaHaskell
            link
            -42 days ago

            If the country is supposed to be “not Christian values” then it’s self-defeating to center and amplify Christian values like anti-capitalism, redistribution, and wielding government as a moral authority.

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              52 days ago

              Once again, you seem to have a lot of trouble with the difference between “supposed to be” and “is.”

              • @NicolaHaskell
                link
                -42 days ago

                What is on lemmy is righteous anti-social ascetic retreats into off grid homeschooled veganism. What I’m having trouble with is understanding how that sparks a change toward whatever you think is supposed to be rather than propagating the Christian status quo.

                • Flying SquidOP
                  link
                  5
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  I have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. The only change is going to be turning the U.S. into a literal Christian country at the end of January when the fascist dictator takes over.

                  Why are you making this about me? I didn’t write the Constitution and I’m not Donald Trump either.