You must log in or register to comment.
So whoever designed this started left to right, decided up to down was better part way through, then switched back to left to right… All without ever proofreading their work apparently
How is it wrong? You intuitively read it correctly and are tripped up by the unusual letter placement. Pretty good design.
you intuitively read it correctly ? It took me three reads
I read it correctly and then did a double take. Seems like I Was the only one to Do that though.
it’s probably some high-level parsing,… I don’t have english as first language but perhaps in french I’d be prone to scan text like that, disregarding typos
Cause if a was a then man according to your logic
Except it was harder to read than if it stayed consistent the whole way through, and that lack of consistency serves to make this look more of a cheap, crappy knickknack than it already looks like
If you read it left to right, it says:
'Cause if I was a then man I’d be the man
Yeah. This is a great one. It doesn’t scan no matter how you start.
3x⬆️ multiplier awarded
'Cause if I was a man, I’d be the man
For anyone struggling
That middle part is even worse than all the other hilarious rubble that’s being posted here.
If you followed the order left to right and read it line by line it’d read: “Cause if I was a then man I’d be the man.” The first “man” is not directly following the “a”.
deleted by creator
Even left to right isn’t legible: Cause if i was a then man id be the man.
They want you to go “a man” and then back to left to right.
cus if I was a man then I’d be the man
No problems with this whatsoever. Totally a logical reading order.
Dat som deep shit: if a man be man
A man, a plan, a canal. Panama!
Miserable pile of secrets.
If a man be man, cause I was then. AMEN 🙏
✊
…what’s a Then Man?
If I was the man then man I’d be the man, man.
man oh man
You don’t even have to read this one wrong for it to be wrong.
