Not willing to give them ideas so fast.

That’s something that popped in my head as soon as I started in here, not so long ago.

But there’s nothing to prevent that, right? I mean, Meta could very well create a meta instance on Lemmy or Kbin or Mastodon or in all of them, bring a bunch of users, sprinkle in some ads because why not.

Sure, they could be defederated from more restrictive insfances. In the bigger picture, every other instance could boycott them, but they would surely federate among themselves (Elon meets Mark, ugh). They also have all the computational power and would have no problem being the largest instances in the Fediverse.

Then what? Is that feasible? Probable? My utopian future about a free, descentralized Fediverse is a lie?

  • @Ungoliantsspawn
    link
    351 year ago

    Honestly is not a big deal. Some specific instance might start behaving like aholes because of corporate greed or anything else.

    All they can do is take their specific communities down. The affected communities can always move to other instance (that is easier than changing to a different system all together).

    Changing platforms will always be harder than just switch instance because you instance changed the rules on you.

    • @_finger_
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      The word “millions of eyes” tends to start attracting corporate overlords. When we hit a million users I think things might start changing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    Most certainly if this grows big enough corporations will join in if only to market whatever products to the userbase.

    What you can do is to work on supporting/curating instances which don‘t want this. Try to see what kind of people are in charge and what their reaction would be. For example I‘m also on an instance (http://lemmy.dbzer0.com/) created by a r/piracy mod who I‘m fairly certain wouldn‘t federate with corporations or let his instance be controlled by them.

    Lemmy.ml which I‘m also on, probably not positive with US companies, but might federate with Chinese companies.

    What makes all this not a big concern for me is how easy it is for me to drop an instance and go to another one, but I‘m also not attached to my users in general, hopefully we can get some export/import functions for cases where we need to abandon somewhere (unless it exists and I haven‘t seen it yet?).

    • deaconblue
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I am just learning my way around in the Fediverse but from what I currently understand I agree with you about being able to go elsewhere if you don’t get along with some new neighbors. I do believe that if this thing gets as big as we all hope it does then the financial resources to scale it up have to come from somewhere. Whether that’s a commercial enterprise backing it for potential financial gain, or a loosely connected group of donors, at least in the west and for sure in the US, whoever puts up the money is going to want to call the shots.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The way I see the federation system is it‘s basically like little states, except they are based on voluntary association.

        So imagine for example if a bunch of people decided: I don‘t like how this country is run and so they are immediately teleported to the country of their choice and other than losing post history (which I hope can be fixed) there is no negative like IRL (it being expensive and purposefully hard to do).

        Shitty countries that don‘t provide for their citizens would start to fall behind and fail. In a way this is happening with migration and one can hope also in business (those whining that nobody wants to work are a prime example), it‘s just the states who stop people and try to keep them captive to labor and fight and pay taxes etc.

        Now in the fediverse on the other hand, it’s as easy as making an account, so if my state turns into a corporate bureaucracy I will pack my bags and leave. Plus with some tech knowhow, if I don‘t like any of the states I‘m making my own. So yeah, I‘m excited and I hope it grows!

      • @RomanRoyOP
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Please, let’s not popularize the “/s” here

        • CMLVI
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          I already got vote massacred cause I made a joke about displaying Nazi logos being illegal, since that neighborhood in…Chicago? outlawed the trans flag(where I was clearly on the right side) and people assumed I was making an actual, factual argument for the nazis. It’s necessary sometimes lol

    • Jack
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I am new here and out of the loop. Can you explain?

      • JohannesOliver
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Beehaw defederated from some of the larger Lemmy instances due to problem users and limited moderation abilities (Lemmy as a platform, limited staff). As one of the larger Lemmy instances themselves and where many Reddit folks went, this rubbed some people the wrong way. Beehaw has a specific idea about the community they want and are proactive in protecting that vision, I don’t know how this makes them “corporate” but there you go.

  • Samuel Proulx
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    So when I read that, I thought you meant instances owned by corporations. I think it’d be pretty nice to go to lemmy.microsoft.com and they’d have groups for all the Microsoft products where users could get support, learn about updates, etc. And you’d know it was an official community because it was hosted by Microsoft. But you could federate, and wouldn’t have to make a forum account for every single company you wanted to interact with. I’m imagining lemmy.apple.com, lemmy.microsoft.com, lemmy.sonos.com, lemmy.linksys.com, whatever. I’d like that.

    • ppptan
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Right. With federation, it’s only an addition to the network, not supplanting it.

  • corytheboyd
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If it makes money, they will come.

    With social sites, money comes from ads, and ads work better served to tons of people. So, if they see millions of people active (anywhere on the internet, not just fediverse), some “marketing genius” will deem it an “untapped market” and it will begin.

    Thing is though, servers are not run by corporations (they could be, of course), so maybe it will be different. But be honest, if you ran a very popular server for free, and someone offered you $2M a year to run some ads… you’re doing it. This is inevitable given growth.

    Maybe everyone will be comfortable with server hopping anyway and it won’t be like it is with Reddit. Idk just having fun for now, actually posting on something for the first time in years because it’s small enough that real people actually talk back hah, riding that as long as I can

    • @Nindelofocho
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      I feel like instances will probably start being sponsored in addition to if not in place of ads like youtubers and their sponsorships

  • Margot Robbie
    link
    131 year ago

    Why not? With the structure of the Fediverse, it’s impossible for anyone to lock their users to their particular instance, and if their users prove to be problematic, they’ll just get defederated.

    • @utopianfiat
      link
      41 year ago

      And if someone can run an instance like a business and still federate, more power to them. Labor should be paid.

  • @MaxTepafray
    link
    111 year ago

    Treat federation like email. Gmail didn’t ruin email.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    That would be a good thing. More instances are good. More users are good.

    If meta federates with Lemmy and mastodon, we could interact with our grandparents again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      If that happens all of them instances would be hugged to death on a daily basis if we’re being honest

  • asjmcguire
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    I’m basically all for it. The Fediverse is supposed to be an inclusive place, for everyone. Then we all get to decide if we don’t want to hear from someone and can block them from our instance, or even block an entire instance. It wouldn’t be terribly inclusive though if we started dictating who could and could not be part of the Fediverse.

  • Cambionn
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    Meta is making a Mastodon-compatible Twitter-replacement app. The Beta is already done with sone populair influences and it’s supposed to go live sometimes soon afaik.

    Otherwise, Mozilla has a Mastodon instance. Depending on how commercial/big you need to be to count as a “corperate instance” to you, there are a few more.

  • Cralder
    link
    91 year ago

    Tumblr has already said they are doing something with the fediverse but I’m not sure if that panned out or not as I have not kept up with the news on that.

    But really, why would that be a bad thing for the users on the smaller instances? If you use Lemmy or kbin or mastodon or whatever for an instance you trust you could interact with users on corporate instances without having to sell your soul to Zuck. I personally don’t see it a a bad thing.

    • @RomanRoyOP
      link
      61 year ago

      The ads! Just wait for the ads!

      • Cralder
        link
        61 year ago

        Do you mean like sponsored posts? If you are talking about banner ads or something that would not apply if you are using an open source implementation like Lemmy or mastodon that is not run by a big corporation. Sponsored posts would also not so very well in the algorithm unless Lemmy implemented a system for it which they most likely would not do.

      • @TheGayDude
        link
        31 year ago

        As long as the ads are limited to sponsor posts and banner ads I really wont mind, you can just scroll past them

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        How would they put ads on our instances ? From what I understand, the only way would be by creating true posts as regular users, in which case most instances would just defederate with them (not sure it is the correct way to say this)

      • @utopianfiat
        link
        01 year ago

        Who cares? If it helps the instance sustain itself long term, then they should get those dollars

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Blocking ads isn’t about the dollars, it is about the malware and tracking and the waste of lifetime.

          • @utopianfiat
            link
            01 year ago

            And why is your life worth more than your admin/mod’s?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              If they got 1 hour of a decent hourly wage for every hour of ads I watch tht might be worth it but it is probably more along the lines of 1000+ hours of ad-watching that would add up to 1 hour of pay for them.

              • @utopianfiat
                link
                11 year ago

                Yes that’s why it’s amortized across 1000+ users

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    We probably want all instances of substantial size to run under incorporated legal entities, because then there’s a legal entity that can collect the donation money, be cooperatively owned, have a DMCA registered agent, get registered as a nonprofit, and so on. We don’t want instance operators personally owing Nintendo a jillion dollars when they try and come for the Zelda memes or whatever.

    I don’t think the important line here is individual vs. legal fiction, it’s whose interests (users vs. owners) the instance is set up to serve.

  • Otome-chan
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    Didn’t meta announce they were gonna make a fediverse thing?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        This new decentralized app, codenamed P92, is still under development — as first reported by MoneyControl. According to the documents seen by the publication, the app will let users log-in through their Instagram credentials. This could irk people who might not want to share that data with another Meta app.

        This really smells like a “plug the hole” operation where they see users might possibly migrate to an alternative to their services that they can’t simply buy out.

  • Kichae
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Meta’s got a microblogging thing coming, and it’s supposed to be coming soon. Tumblr has ActivityPub support on their roadmap.

    It’s coming. There will be issues with it, possibly around advertising, definitely around spam and moderation.

    Many big instances will become small overnight, and will likely federate with corporate sites. Many small instances will suddenly be tiny in comparison and not federate with them.