• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    120
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The crazy part isn’t that people want to be able to disable that. The crazy part is that they want to pay to disable them…

    No you guys, that should just be an option, no questions asked. Included in the options menu for… Well, whatever the asking price of the base game is. Also known as included in the base game.

    • @riodoro1
      link
      English
      412 months ago

      Today’s consumers for ya.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The word consumer is so demeaning… But yes.

        Humans are actually the only real producers in the world if you think about it. Everything around you is built by other humans.

        We rarely think about that.

    • eighty
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 months ago

      I really dislike being reductive so take what I say with a grain of salt:

      I am not surprised that the people who regularly buy the COD series with all of it’s monetary practices for the past decade are asking to buy a feature. They’d be more shocked if you could features/updates/qol without buying it. Habituation, de-sensitisation, whatever - they’re the whales that fuel the decline in AAA games.

    • @RightHandOfIkaros
      link
      English
      92 months ago

      People are offering to pay as a hyperbole to try to tell Activision how much they want to disable the skins. Nobody actually is willing to pay extra for that. Its like dangling a carrot in front of a corporations face.

      “We want to do X so badly, we are willing to pay for it,” which translates to " We want to do X so badly, we are willing to do the last possible option that we want in order to be able to do X."

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        tells the oligarchy they’ll pay to not be annoyed

        acts surprised when not being annoyed becomes a subscription service

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -4
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      People are offering to pay for it because they understand that providing that feature would potentially cause lost revenue for Call of Duty, since (theoretically) players are buying skins so other players can see them.

      I imagine there are a lot of potential solutions (I can think of a few at least) but Activision probably think the lowest risk is to do nothing.

  • @MrFappy
    link
    English
    222 months ago

    Then don’t play the game. Cosmetics like that are essentially CoD’s bread and butter, and have been for decades. I don’t disagree that it’s gotten WAY out of hand, but that’s also why I don’t play COD anymore.

    • @afk
      link
      English
      322 months ago

      I don’t think you know what “decades” means.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        50,000 people used to live here, now it’s a ghost town…

        5 Nov 2007

        Didn’t have skins except for on the weapons, and you had to earn those. One of the first games ever with selectable perks. It was such a breath of fresh air after years of World War 2 games. World at War afterwards was the first one with zombies though, and it had tanks in the big multi player maps. It was only 17 years ago… video games were amazing. I stopped playing after the first black ops. It is just like any other EA sports franchise.

        • @RightHandOfIkaros
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          World at War was the best one, what do you mean?

          Though I stopped at WaW, then played Advanced Warfare (which was cool I guess), Infinite (which I actually really liked), and WW2 (which was honestly pretty bad especially by comparison to WaW).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 months ago

      You’re asking the average cod player to stop playing? They are unable to. It’s the reason why the series is where it is, its playerbase is… not the smartest.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 months ago

    Next year: pay to cut an opponent’s frame rate in half, as a bidding system. Whoever is offering the least premium coin gets the debuff.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I haven’t been playing competitive FPS games for a long time, but they used to be a dime a dozen. There must be some kind of alternative multiplayer FPS that you could just play instead if you’re not happy with Call of Duty.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      I am hoping modern games get so bad people finally start having halo 2 lan parties again.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        I still haven’t had a better arena shooter experience than back in the xbox lan over the internet days

      • GHiLA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You can just play Halo 2 multiplayer.

        It’s right there. They’re stabbing and shooting all day long just waiting for you.

    • @Zahille7
      link
      English
      12 months ago

      I know some people kinda liked that XDefiant game, or The Finals

    • GHiLA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      I have a friend like this, well, he was like this for years and years, and I get it. You want to follow the hype and excitement of the greater gaming public when a game is new, but it’s just so fleeting when you could go play nearly anything similar with an active playerbase basically… forever.