TLDR: i complain about samsung’s flagship and newer android.

I use samsung flagship phone and it’s crazy, how unable I am to use full potential of my phone, just because I don’t want to log in to google neither to samsung. I try to use F-droid and Aurora Store whenever possible, but its so bad experience…for maps I use Organic Maps, but google forces it to be installed specifically from Google Play Store to work with Android Auto, so I have to log in every time there is an update. Most of games won’t work, because they require being signed-in to google, and thats actually kinda weird…before my phone now I had an old Galaxy S5 Android 6.0 and games there didn’t complain that much as here on Android 14 (so the newer android the less privacy you get, while them all companies “focus on privacy”, bullshit liars), samsung requires signing-in to usd like 1/10 of the flagship features…It’s so sad, as I love samsung’s quality, phone is really outstanding, overall all samsung products are very good quality, but pushing these fucking accounts is convincing me not to buy samsung’s flagship anymore. We need to finally unite and make some alternative to those close-sourced bloatware, as phone industry is nowhere near to being as free as desktop industry. I feel more free using Windoze than those fucking " smart"phones. Really if you have to buy new smartphone and are into privacy, think twice before you buy samsung…phone itself is great, but software side is a nightmare.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Lineage and a fork, DivestOS are very close to Graphene, and run on far more devices.

    The search for perfection is the enemy of good.

    I’ve run Lineage for years on some spare devices. Battery life is so much better without Google Services.

    My most recent device (Pixel 5 with DivestOS) is averaging 1.1% battery consumption per hour over the last day. That included an hour of navigation, using Google maps with microG services.

    One old device runs longer with DivestOS than it ever did with stock, and the battery has lost 40% capacity. That’s how bad Google Services eat battery.

    Plus Lineage permits you to use a number of old devices, unlike Graphene. It’s good, it gives you far more control than Google.

    My final thought on Graphene - it needs to be taken over and lead by some professionals. Those folks act like stereotypical geeks of 30 years ago, arrogant, condescending (I worked with their type 30 years ago, and was a little like them then). They also denigrate anything less than what they deem “perfect”. The very definition of hubris.

    Their attitude is “if you have a problem you must’ve done something wrong, why did you do something wrong”. Having that experience with them has put me off Graphene permanently.

    Edit: I can re-lock the bootloader with Divest, so the condescending Graphene folks are just plain wrong about being the only OS that can do this. I don’t lock it, because my threat model doesn’t require it. The odds of my phone being grabbed by someone with state-actor-level skills being after me is non-existent, and there are easier ways to get the same data from me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    175 hours ago

    As someone who’s used android literally since the first android phone was released, it’s a massive disappointment how locked down and enshittified it’s become.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53 hours ago

    This is why I specifically pick phones that have custom ROM support. Then I don’t need to install gapps and I just use fdroid

  • @j4k3
    link
    English
    306 hours ago

    I am surprised it took you this long.

    The next step in this evolutionary thinking is simple. Buying hardware specs is a fool’s folly. I don’t compare hardware. Ads and marketing are totally nonsense and not worth even a slight glance. The ONLY thing that matters is what open source projects exist and what hardware do they support well. This is how I shop. Open Source or F.O.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 hours ago

      I’ve bought used phones since 2013. The most I’ve ever paid is $150, and that was recently for a Pixel.

      You can pickup a Pixel 4 for about $100.

      Surely “most people” are paying far more for their phones.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      124 hours ago

      The a series is pretty good bang for your buck, if you can’t afford that and neither used ones, then maybe you could settle for one of the cheaper Asian ones supported by Divest OS

      • Great Blue Heron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 hours ago

        Exactly - I’m still very happy with my 4a. A used 5, 6 or 7a would be very cheap and very usable.

    • Autonomous User
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Most people have no problem paying more for an iPhone.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 hours ago

          Rich?

          So only the half of the US that buys iPhone’s is rich?

          Or is it they don’t know what they’re paying because it’s part of the monthly bill?

          Most of the iPhone users I know are in their 20’s and make less than half of what I do… And I’m far from rich.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 hour ago

            So only the half of the US that buys iPhone’s is rich?

            Yes. A lot of people worldwide are much less rich than that.

        • Autonomous User
          link
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          If that’s rich, you worse problems than privacy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The biggest problem is the scarce availability outside the US.

      Or should I say, that the biggest problem is software (OS) compatibility with other devices than the Pixel?

      My money is on the latter.

  • Joël de Bruijn
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    All in all my conclusion after experiencing the same: Samsung wants to replicate the same level of surveilance Google has. So with a Samsung phone I need to degoogle AND to desamsung …