cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/26939610

High-capacity and high-speed SD and microSD cards will receive improved Linux support on the latest 6.11 kernel update.

    • @devfuuu
      link
      71 month ago

      I’m still getting over disks above 250GB being common.

        • @PriorityMotif
          link
          11 month ago

          I think I paid $100 or so for a 180GB? Drive around 20 years ago. About 14ish years ago I paid a decent amount for a 120gb ssd.

  • John Richard
    link
    61 month ago

    128TB SD cards sounds awesome if they perform well. Now if we could just get a 128TB microSD that performs close to a PCIe I’ll be swallowing my OS in a digestion proof container if necessary.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      41 month ago

      SD Express is advertised as PCIe gen 3 speeds (~1GBps) but will be a while before we see a microsd like that lol

      • John Richard
        link
        21 month ago

        I guess I could swallow an SD card if I had to. 😮

    • @KingRandomGuy
      link
      11 month ago

      Not quite the same thing but modern high end cameras use CF-Express (as in compact flash). They communicate over PCIe using the same protocol as NVMe drives but have fewer lanes and usually are smaller. The tricky part is with their small size you don’t have as much room to cram as many flash chips onto a card compared to a 2280 NVMe.

  • Blaster M
    link
    51 month ago

    Looking at the actual commit notes, it is SDUC support, which starts at 2TB and goes up to 128TB

    • Draconic NEO
      link
      fedilink
      11 month ago

      I find it hard to believe they only recently added GPT partitioning support , or was there some other issue happening with the removable storage mediums above a certain amount?

      • Blaster M
        link
        11 month ago

        Nah, it’s just SDUC cards are a different hardware design.

        • Draconic NEO
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          I’m not sure I’m following, what was the technological leap here? I know that the SD, SDHC, SDXC, etc. are marketing terms and their limitations are based on other factors, much of the previous ones are file system related.

          • SD - FAT16 Volume size limit, Practical limit 2GB, Max limit 4GB
          • SDHC - FAT32 limit Set at 32GB by Microsoft (fake limit)
          • SDXC - 2TB limit, Maximum partition size for MBR partition Scheme.

          I assume that it’s a similar story here but it might not be, if so I’m curious as to what changed.

          • Blaster M
            link
            11 month ago

            The I/O commands are different as well, the hardware has to support SDUC.