that would be fun and easy to use but that would mean no neofetch no terminal games no ls no vim no flatpak sadly would that be a good distro? i know about chromeos and android and i know linux users don’t usually recognize those as linux distros but i do honestly

  • Chewy
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    11 minutes ago

    Thanks to image-based distros like Fedora Atomic, I skipped the asking to update step. They download and apply updates in the background, and then the new image gets selected on next boot.

    Given Fedora doesn’t do major changes in point releases, nothing breaks (until I do a manual upgrade to a new (half-)yearly major release).

    Not having a terminal does not make sense (unless in a business context). For some people (my mum) it’s as if it doesn’t exist anyway, so why remove it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    243 minutes ago

    I wouldn’t like that, no sir, I wouldn’t like that at all!

    Too many useful tools on the terminal.

  • @Deckweiss
    link
    11
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Not even Microsoft has a Windows distro without a terminal.

  • @beirdobaggins
    link
    54 hours ago

    I feel like you think the terminal is just for installing updates…

    The linux terminal is why I use linux.

    vim, diff, cat, grep, sed, awk, and sort are so freaking powerful and useful.

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    87 hours ago

    You literally use Mint without ever opening the terminal if you’re just a regular/casual user. The update manager notifies you of new updates and you can use the gui.

  • Libb
    link
    fedilink
    25 hours ago

    I don’t care much about Neofetch and flatpak, but how would I run my scripts without a shell?

    I reckon that would make me switch back to Mac exclusively ;)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    118 hours ago

    Unsure if you’re being serious or not. Or if this is just bait. So I apologize in case I just got whooshed.

    There’s a decent amount of distros that don’t require you to ever operate a terminal. Updates either

    • happen automatically in the background
    • Or, you’re prompted for an update and can choose to run it
    • Or, within settings or a dedicated app, you can press a button to initiate the process of updating

    Furthermore, most distros that are recommended for beginners don’t need regular updates anyways.

    Updating isn’t the only part that has been taken care of by this set of distros. Linux has become pretty smooth sailing overall.

    Notable exceptions to the above are mostly tied to some janky/troublesome hardware setup. Or, if you’d like to run software that isn’t easily accessible. In those cases, while a GUI-only solution may exist, it’s simply a lot easier for all involved parties if a terminal solution is offered instead:

    • it works on most distros; irrespective of version, DE, base distro or whatsoever. So, the one providing a solution doesn’t have to create over a dozen of distinct solutions to cover all bases
    • these methods tend to change a lot less frequently. Sometimes solutions are tied to DEs, and these may change how they organize stuff over time. So, terminal solutions have better longevity
    • instead of moving through dozens of menus/toolbars/buttons or whatsoever, you literally copy and paste a couple of commands and you’re done. I would prefer the terminal any day

    OP, you did get me curious, though. Which distro do you use?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      08 hours ago

      xubuntu and while i know that xubuntu from time to time will tell you to update without opening the terminal it still forces you to learn how to use it!! and yes i know that desktop environments do most of the work for example gnome is really good at being for beginners and for everyone xfce too

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 hours ago

        Thanks for answering!

        xubuntu

        I’ve only started to use Linux after Snaps were introduced to Ubuntu. As the community has been pretty vocal in their disdain, I lost any inclinations to test out Ubuntu or any of its flavors from the get-go.

        Though, I have used Zorin lite; which is Ubuntu LTS with Xfce by the Zorin OS team. Which is probably the closest I’ll get to Xubuntu. From what I recall, it was pretty neat. I did use the terminal, but it was more out of convention. Therefore I don’t really recognize myself in the following sentiment:

        it still forces you to learn how to use it!

        Would you mind elaborating?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26 hours ago

        On your next distro hop try OpenSUSE with Gnome. Gnome will prompt when the system has updates for you and you just hit the update button. If you want to add remove software use the Yast2 Software GUI tool. You search a software, check the package you want and hit finish. All the system admin can be Done with YAST2 GTK GUI. No need for terminal

  • @eyeon
    link
    89 hours ago

    then I would install one

  • @mvirts
    link
    58 hours ago

    Get Ubuntu, uninstall the terminal emulator, disable vt switching, there you go.

  • Julian
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 hours ago

    No flatpak? Who uses flatpak in the terminal?

    Also pretty much every distro has some sort of GUI update manager.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 hours ago

    I think most people wouldn’t recognize it as a real Linux distro just like android and chromeos.

  • @solrize
    link
    18 hours ago

    What does that even mean? But yes lots of us run Linux on servers. Just ssh in. Or even just wipe the VM and launch a new one if you want to upgrade.