• @Zulu
    link
    276 days ago

    If a different company can make the same game, but better, then more power to them. They’ll have to overcome the wall of players that “dont want to play another horizon” as well as innovate to make it feel fresh.

    If someone made a copy of legally-distinct bloodborne it would do beyond amazing if enough effort and love was put into it.

    All of this to say, if the game is a cash grab with tracky drm or microtransactions then its not going to do well if it is like that PLUS a ‘rip-off’ of another game.

    Just don’t preorder and see if its a cash grab first. Extremely difficult for some i know.

    • @Sabin10
      link
      96 days ago

      Well it’s going to be free to play so expect lots of garbage monetization

      • Deconceptualist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -3
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Tencent owns Digital Extremes as of a few years ago, and last I knew its monetization wasn’t too bad. So maybe there’s a slim chance they’ll take a lesson from that?

        I’m sure that’s a stretch though since DE built up their payment model many years prior and were bought when they were already successful with a large playerbase. A new franchise is likely a very different story.

        • @Zulu
          link
          26 days ago

          Yep. Tencent has a major share in Path of Exile too and that game is beyond generous being f2p with no p2w.

          I remain cautious but optimistic for all games. There’s nothing wrong with being excited. Just dont buy into stuff without proof and you wont be disappointed.

          At worst, it’s just not what you thought it’d be and you dont buy/play it.

    • @inclementimmigrantOP
      link
      4
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Yeah, remains to be seen but even Palworld got flack for copying Pokemon’s style even if it was a good game which I enjoy. I saw an article just a bit ago where the palworld developer was interviewed and he stated he felt he was still under the shadow of the AI copying accusations.

      Still like you said, it’s one thing to copy an art style, another to actually make a good and compelling game.

  • @dance_ninja
    link
    116 days ago

    Yeah looking at the art and screenshots they showed I could definitely mistake it for a Horizon game.

  • @surph_ninja
    link
    116 days ago

    Ok. Did they do it better?

    If it’s an improvement, I don’t really care if it’s a copy.

    • Thassodar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 days ago

      From the trailer I saw it looks like a hybrid of Horizon, Monster Hunter, and Dragon’s Dogma. If it’s free to play it’s almost guaranteed not to be single player, so there’s that as well.

      • @Sylvartas
        link
        06 days ago

        Honestly I was kinda disappointed when horizon turned out not to be the “monster hunter with robots” I thought I saw in the trailers

  • Hegar
    link
    fedilink
    96 days ago

    Zero Dawn was great, I’m definitely happy to see more games with the same vibe.

  • @Bleys
    link
    6
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Imagine if after Doom, no one else was allowed to make another FPS, yet alone a space shooter.

    • @inclementimmigrantOP
      link
      166 days ago

      Imagine if every FPS after Doom has the exact same art style as Doom.

        • @inclementimmigrantOP
          link
          8
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Maybe this is selective memory but I remember the old dos days differently.

          Outside of your capstone games, gloom, and Super Noah’s Ark, I seem to remember, most successful clones had their own style.

          Hexen, red neck rampage, duke nukem 3d, dark forces, rise of the triad, had unique art styles even when limited by current level design.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
    link
    fedilink
    -46 days ago

    and yet china claims to be winning and winning. LOL. the chinese youth will have a hard time with no good jobs. but hey, xi is ruler for live…so good for the rest of the world because china invents nothing of relevance these days. yes, they steal like chatGPT but their conclusions are worse. i for one welcome china to keep failing at everything. if you have no citizens being able to think free, you’ll have to keep on copying.