I’ve been thinking of switching from btrfs to zfs but it seems like it’s quite a bit of work. Does anyone have any experience with this?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    223 minutes ago

    I used ZFS with Arch for a while, the volume manager was what I’d call the largest benefit; in my opinion nothing else comes close to being as useful and well integrated.

    I stopped because ZFS incompatibility with recent kernels (which I needed for GPU reasons) made me have to rescue my system more often than was ideal.

    Some other minor downsides:

    • boot can take ages due to ZFS using udev-settle.
    • deduplication status is… Complicated.
    • you’re kind-of stuck with the performance of your slowest vdev; L2ARC & a metadata device don’t really compensate well for a zpool that is predominantly a raid-z2 of spinning rust.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I use it everywhere, raidz2 on HDDs for a NAS also with mirrored NVMe root pool, and on a couple of laptops. zfsbootmenu is awesome, so I can boot into any snapshot, and a pacman hook that creates a snapshot whenever I upgrade packages. Even if it’s overkill for some of my use, I use it anyway and trust it much more than anything else - it has a proven track record. Backups to rsync.net are a breeze with borg/borgmatic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    110 hours ago

    I did for a long time until it was pulled from Ubuntu and Mint’s respective installers. Loved it when I had it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    414 hours ago

    I am using ZFS on root on Arch using 2x 2TB SSDs striped . I mainly did it because my server runs on ZFS as well and thought snapshotting and backup would be easy, but instead went with Borg backup anyway.

    Installation wasn’t very difficult, but the ZFS kernel modules can’t keep up with kernel updates (even with LTS kernel) on Arch, so I constantly need to do partial upgrades and it’s been annoying. As much as I love ZFS I’m not sure I’d do it again on Arch. If your distro is not using bleeding edge kernels then I don’t foresee any issues really.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        36 hours ago

        It is, but with kernel-specific packages you have the kernel linux(-lts) and the kernel module zfs-linux(-lts) and they aren’t in sync. Even with the LTS kernel I run into the issue that I can’t update the kernel since there’s a dependency issue between ZFS and Linux.

        I have both LTS and zen and I’m currently on 6.6.36 and 6.9.7 respectively.

  • @gi1242
    link
    515 hours ago

    why do you want to make the switch?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      315 hours ago

      I like the idea of deduplication and checksumming to prevent bit rot. It also sounds like backups via snapshots is extremely powerful, but maybe that’s something btrfs can do too.

      Ultimately though it would be about learning. That’s what’s drawn me to Linux in the first place.

  • Antithetical
    link
    fedilink
    213 hours ago

    Yes, and it saved my ass a few times. Every computer I own now and in the future will have at least mirrored or raidz disks with zfs. On all desktops, laptops, servers and nas.

    Even upgrading from spinning rust to ssd was easy replacing the disks one by one and resilvering.

    The (k)ubuntu installation made it very easy to have an encrypted zfs rootfs but they may have removed it on newer installation iso’s, I’m not sure…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 hours ago

    I try to avoid zfs because I don’t wanna use a external kernel module, I already have 1 external kernel module (nvidia) already.