AMD claims that the new Ryzen 9 7945X3D with a whopping 144MB cache is the fastest mobile gaming processor on the planet, and that it’s more than 15 percent faster than the Ryzen 9 7945HX on average. It has 16 cores, 32 threads, up to 5.4 Ghz boost speeds and 55W+ TDP. The CPU is built on the Zen 4 architecture.

  • @Contramuffin
    link
    English
    91 year ago

    It’s because the 7900 and 7950 are using an “old” naming scheme and the 7945 is using a new naming scheme.

    • 7 = released in 2023
    • 9 = Ryzen 9
    • 4 = Zen 4
    • 5 = mobile/APU

    One of the side effects of this is that bigger number no longer necessarily means better, especially if you’re comparing between architectures

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 year ago

    it’s funny how tech-forward “3D V” sounds and it really just means “we stuck more cache on top.”

    • @symcal
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      If that means I can get consistent crazy performance on a 55W laptop chip then I don’t see a problem. Once we hit the limit of Moore’s law I suspect we will see many clever innovations and I personally can’t wait.

    • @symcal
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      The factory must grow

  • @panda_paddle
    link
    English
    161 year ago

    Can’t wait to read the Userbenchmark review telling me why this chip is actually garbage and how only idiots buy AMD.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      "When using all 16 cores at a TDP of 5 watts, it is actually a lot slower then the core i3-1969UwU, making it pretty useless for battery operation. Consider buying an intel CPU.

    • Final Remix
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      I’m an idiot that’s only ever had problems with Intel. Weirdly, same with AMD/ATI graphics. Only AMD CPU/APUs and GeForce GPUs for this idiot, here.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    Ryzen 9 7945X3D

    I don’t know why this name is so funny to me. It just seems so much more ridiculous than an evenly named Ryzen 9 79500X3D. Like what, were getting 45 more units worth of a Ryzen 9 7900X3D, but not quite enough units for a Ryzen 9 7982X3D?

    • @Contramuffin
      link
      English
      171 year ago

      It’s because the 7900 and 7950 are using an “old” naming scheme and the 7945 is using a new naming scheme.

      • 7 = released in 2023
      • 9 = Ryzen 9
      • 4 = Zen 4
      • 5 = mobile/APU

      One of the side effects of this is that bigger number no longer necessarily means better, especially if you’re comparing between architectures

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Thanks for the explanation! That makes a lot more sense than what I assumed was an arbitrary number assignment.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    This is absolutely ridiculous. Looking at what we get out of mobile CPUs today, when I have a laptop with an i7-7700HQ from 2017 that has… 4 cores/8 threads and is turboing to somewhere in the mid 3GhZ range. With a 45W TDP.

    The last 5 years have been such a turbo charging for CPUs

    • @InverseParallax
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      Intel without competition is extremely profitable.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Jesus Christ, this thing is unreal. It’s like reading the headlines for the Soviet Superman.