Attorneys who argued against Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming healthcare at the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed hope that the court’s nine justices will take “the opportunity to affirm the essential freedom and equality of all people before the law,” while reports indicated that the right-wing majority is inclined to uphold the ban.
So the supremacy clause is dead. Cool.
Now to bring back slavery.
Bring back? Slavery is still legal, they just have to jail you first.
True - I mean just - masks off, out and proud owning people.
Chief Justice John Roberts … pointed to changes some European countries have made to their gender-affirming care protocols for minors.
Are you fucking kidding me? This is the same man who will utterly humiliate any lawyer who tries to use another country’s legal precedent in the US Supreme Court.
Its the Whose Line Is It Anyway legal theory.
The justifications are made up and the precedents don’t matter.
Oh? So they’re going to “deny” rights to transgender folks?
Probably not the best timing for this decision.
I wonder what the argument is for it and if it would hurt cis people aswell
Of course it will. Cis people are harmed by transphobia too:
https://www.them.us/story/two-cisgender-people-killed-in-transphobic-attacks
https://19thnews.org/2024/08/cisgender-women-of-color-anti-trans-violence/
https://www.them.us/story/jasmine-adams-staten-island-deli-attack-mistaken-trans
https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/07/14/indiana-michelle-dionne-peacock-trans-killed/
