A series of brain injuries and other serious health ailments that struck hundreds of U.S. diplomats and intelligence officials was almost certainly the work of a U.S. adversary, according to a new report by lawmakers, who accuse U.S. intelligence agencies of trying to hide the truth.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 days ago

    “Renewed concerns” seems to mean “House Republicans stirring up anti-russian sentiment” in this case.

    VOA is strictly aligned with American interests, enough that you might call it propaganda, but at least they report the facts. Actually reading the article, it tells you that this report is garbage.

  • @RangerJosie
    link
    English
    55 days ago

    I got Havana Syndrome as a side effect from the Bone Worms I caught while fighting the Grafton Monster.

  • @Rapidcreek
    link
    46 days ago

    This is a very interesting story which I’ve followed since the begining years ago. Thanks for sharing, but not much seems to have changed

  • @JeremyHuntQW12
    link
    35 days ago

    according to a new report by lawmakers,

    So a bunch of failed lawyers.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
    link
    English
    25 days ago

    So the Republicans who run the committee were upset they didn’t find anything linking it to an adversary. Got it.

    • OBJECTION!
      link
      fedilink
      23 days ago

      Ooh! Looks like we can add Havana Syndrome to the list of things you’re not allowed to question on .world. Is there anything the US government says that we’re allowed to doubt?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -23 days ago

        Pretty every other comment here is, more or less, agreeing with you that the IC consensus was right, it probably wasn’t a foreign adversary, congress doesn’t know what it’s talking about, and the evidence is that this report and this story is a bunch of crap.

        Yours was the only comment that was shouty, condescending, and insulting, in addition to saying that the report is wrong. You were not censored for your content.

        • OBJECTION!
          link
          fedilink
          33 days ago

          Then why was it removed for “misinformation” and not “being shouty?”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -23 days ago

            I am trying to help you understand how to not get your comments removed, and also to have more productive interactions online.

            If you’re not interested, then fine. I can tell you the information, but I can’t make you absorb it. I’m not interested in being drawn into an extensive and pointless debate about what some other person wrote in their report field and why.

            • OBJECTION!
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Hey, you know who could actually help me know how to avoid getting my comments removed? The mod who removed my comment. You know, in that little space underneath the action in the modlog where they’re supposed to list the reason for removal? Well, the good news is they told me, and the reason that they told me is that they consider the information that I wrote to be false. So I have concluded that that’s the reason it was removed. Because the person who removed it told me so.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    06 days ago

    Post this on reddit and see a FLOOD of experts claiming it’s BS. This subject is highly monitored in there