• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    172 days ago

    Maybe it’s time the US enforces a new law stating that max pay and min pay for a company must be no more than a certain ratio, including shopped out work and part time workers.

  • @UnderpantsWeevil
    link
    English
    102 days ago

    Actually, it takes a lot of hard work and intelligence to exploit the vulnerable and you’re just jealous you didn’t think of it first.

    • @Mango
      link
      02 days ago

      Or even a god.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    people forget just how much of the world lives in shocking poverty

    no one should be able to amass wealth in the billions

    also, capitalism serves to create oppressive business models: a health insurance company that pays out their insurance claims likely does not perform as well compared to companies like UHC that deny claims on a dime. companies like UHC can grow their business and expand with the wealth they’ve made from scamming their clients out of health care

  • @gibmiser
    link
    58
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    What are all the Christmas stories all about? It’s always someone being greedy and changing their ways. It is a value in America to be generous and to change your ways. We have just forgotten…

    We just have to actually listen to our revered holiday stories. Shove them down their throats

    • @Xenny
      link
      263 days ago

      I prefer this new way of planting messages directly into their ribcages

    • Ogmios
      link
      fedilink
      -73 days ago

      Haven’t you heard? Those stories are all bigoted propaganda rooted in white supremacy.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        There’s certainly no shortage of White Man’s Burden propaganda floating around. But that’s through philanthropy, not Dickensian morality.

  • @CitizenKong
    link
    223 days ago

    They act like literal Bond villians and then act surprised when people see them as less than nice people?

      • @Evolith
        link
        21 day ago

        I felt like Bond villains actually paid their henchmen a decent wage, hence why they were always willing to die for the job.

        That’s much more than we can say for real life billionaires.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It’s even worse than that … if you are profiteering off the money that people use for their health, life saving treatments, preventative health care or just to stay alive … that is far worse to me than a Hollywood villain.

    Movie villains state outright that they want to kill people or blow up an entire city full of people. A health care CEO gouging money off of cancer patients and being rewarded for taking advantage of millions of people across the county is far more evil to me.

  • @GelatinGeorge
    link
    143 days ago

    All I’m saying is, if it’s the real hero killer, then the lesson we can all take from this - hypothetically - is next time just lie low, don’t go to McDonald’s and especially don’t go to McDonald’s with your fake ID, manifesto and, for the love of Christ, not your favourite 3D printed gun.

    • @brygphilomena
      link
      22 days ago

      If there is ever a time for Uber eats to drop off food contactless, this was it.

    • @frostysauce
      link
      22 days ago

      Also don’t wear a mask deep in COVID-denying Bumfuck, PA.

  • @Allonzee
    link
    9
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Herp derp “job creators exercising the noblest of impulses: rational self-interest”

    The greatest cultural propaganda the owners achieved through their for profit media and captured education, particularly economics, that enabled all others was that greed/avarice was not the personal failing, character deficit, and destructive force that it is, but instead the highest of virtue.

    Its not. The Gordon Geckos, Mr. Potters, and Ebenezer Scrooges in fiction were cautionary tales, villains. Yet they’ve convinced us that that is what we should either be or worship.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 days ago

      For most people if you never had to work a day of your life for you to live a decent life you probably would follow your own interests. And I’m not blaming you for that, but mass wealth isn’t accomplished by everyone going on a journey of selffulfillment. Which economic system works better might I ask you?

      • @Allonzee
        link
        6
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s not just about different systems. It’s about priorities.

        The Nordic model keeps capitalism heavily, heavily straightjacked, to power the wellbeing of society.

        Taxes aren’t largely resented, because everyone is educated to understand that when you succeed, the society you’re a part of succeeds. No one fears going to a doctor, higher education is based on academic merit because everyone benefits from an educated populace. When you succeed, you are taxed to a degree that would make our capitalists cry. Yet they are the happiest people’s in the world. And if that isn’t the goal of any society, they’re doing it wrong. We don’t prioritize that at all, only how high our most effective sociopaths can fly.

        Here, the tail has been wagging the dog for a long time, the false promise of being “free” to attain society warping levels of wealth has toxified our culture into forgeting that freedom devoid of responsibility is a rampage. Meanwhile everyone else is free to die in the gutter alone for the crime of not making them enough money.

        Letting people gain enough wealth to warp society beyond their single vote, and more, not punishing trying to infect our politics with life imprisonment, has destroyed our democracy, it’s all for show. You pick a major party, and I’ll show you a party that’s been bought and paid for by the same people, to the point they’ve made it all perfectly legal since Reagan and especially since Citizens United.

        Capitalism belongs in making optional widgets for a reasonable profit it has no place in sectors people need to survive. Those should be socialized, because in those sectors stability is more important than economic growth/metastasis.

        If it isn’t enough motivation to have a peak of maybe 2 really big homes and 1 really big boat, then I question that person’s motivations and recognition that they are a member of a society and not society’s owner.

        No one should have more unelected, unaccountable power over society than their single vote allows. No one. Capital beyond material needs and desires is power.

        TLDR start with making attempting to bribe an elected official the highest of capital crimes, life no parole as they’re actively attempting to bend all of society to their desires, only public funds for campaigns, continue by rewarding labor with far lower taxation than speculative, insider info laden gambling that should be taxed astronomically as the vice it is, and then have a maximum wealth tax at let’s say a 100 million dollars where they’re declared the winner, given a cake, and congratulations on all additional wealth going into improving the roads and commons of the society that facilitated their accumulation of such astronomical wealth to begin with.

        If someone like Elon wants a kingdom, let him fly to Mars and make one.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113 days ago

    Hey now! They are also taking on a lot of risk! Like being poor if they somehow manage to miss the golden parachute after messing up on the job

    • @Passerby6497
      link
      English
      53 days ago

      They are also taking on a lot of risk! Like being poor marginally less rich if they somehow manage to miss the golden parachute after messing up on the job

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 days ago

        If you don’t have wealth amassed outside the company and the company ends up not being able to pay debts your entire livelihood can be taken by a debt collector. Really depends on the company but if you want to get a loan banks want some safety to back it up

        • @Passerby6497
          link
          English
          11 day ago

          If you don’t have wealth amassed outside the company and the company ends up not being able to pay debts your entire livelihood can be taken by a debt collector.

          Man, I wonder what it would be like to live like that. Just dependent on a company making money so you don’t have your livelihood taken from you…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53 days ago

    Even if you pay your workers a good wage, the reason you are a billionaire or your company makes billions in profit is because you overcharge your clients which might not be in a good financial situation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 days ago

      As long as the profit margin isn’t to right I think it is ethical for companies to make a slight profit

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Slight profit I’ve got no issue with, but if you make a slight profit because the CEO pockets 100m a year then clearly there’s a fucking issue, get rid of the CEO and make 100m more in profit that you can actually use to improve your product OR get rid of that CEO and make it cheaper for your customers to purchase your product and end up with the same profit.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate
      link
      -13 days ago

      the reason you are a billionaire or your company makes billions in profit is because you overcharge your clients

      This is an assumption.

      Costco’s founder, who was also the CEO up until a few years ago, is a billionaire. And that’s a company that is famous both for its very competitive prices on the customer side (insert infamous story about ‘threatening’ to kill someone if they raised the price of that hot dog), AND for how well it treats its workforce.

      You can become a billionaire just by creating something that a large number of people find valuable, and continuing to own it as its value in others’ eyes increases over time. Because that’s what net worth fundamentally is–it’s the price tag of how valuable everyone else thinks shares of that company are worth.

      The implication that you HAVE to be ripping people off to acquire wealth (and when it comes to increasing one’s wealth, ‘billionaire’ is just a distinction of scale) is just plain wrong, an ignorant talking point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It’s not an assumption, the surplus generated to make someone a billionaire comes from the pockets of the customers, they don’t make it appear out of nowhere. Just because something looks like a deal it doesn’t mean that it is, if you’re always paying 5$ for an orange, 3$ feels like a deal because you’ve gotten used to paying 5$, the truth is it’s just not worth either price when you look at the actual cost to bring an orange from the tree to your house.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 days ago

          Thats not how the net worth of a company works. You don’t have to make massive profits for people to value your company highly

        • ObjectivityIncarnate
          link
          12 days ago

          You are suggesting that $X in profit = $X of having “overcharged” the customer.

          This is completely ridiculous on its face. No private entity will or should ever go to all the effort and time and resources to start a new business if there will never be any profit. Obviously.

          And ironically, even if the government gets involved in providing X instead, without profit in mind, the bureaucracy is such that its ‘no profit’ price for X is invariably higher than a price a private entity can charge while profiting.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            02 days ago

            No I’m saying that if their profit didn’t need to take a useless billionaire leech into consideration then prices could be lower.

            That last part is complete bullshit as well and you would know it if you knew anything about crown corporations.

            • ObjectivityIncarnate
              link
              02 days ago

              if their profit didn’t need to take a useless billionaire leech into consideration then prices could be lower.

              You know the profit existed first, right?

              That last part is complete bullshit as well and you would know it if you knew anything about crown corporations.

              Yeah, they’re totally not huge money pits, I was wayyy off, lol.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Profits are revenues minus spendings, remove the leech and you need less revenues to make the same profit. That’s how companies manage to make their numbers look good by cutting staff, but they’ll never cut upper management (the guys you’re defending).

                Ontario privatize hydro, rates go up

                Hydro Quebec is a crown corporations and offers the best rates in North America

                Saskatchewan has the best telecom rates in Canada through its crown corporation

                Quebec and BC have the best car insurance rates because it’s managed by crown corporations

                The list goes on and on and on

                The goal of Canada Post is to offer an essential service to all Canadians at the same low cost, you say private corporations would be better? Well there’s no mail or packages being delivered to remote locations because they don’t want to provide the service. So it’s ok for you to let the private sector handle deliveries and let northern Canada end up being unable to receive mail? Hell, at the moment even in cities is hard to get stuff delivered and costs are much higher than they are with Canada Post, funny how it turns out it’s the opposite of what you said that happens when the private sector is left to handle shit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              02 days ago

              Have you ever considered people becoming billionaires of companies that haven’t made a single cent of profit? Spotify never made any profit for example and is still valued at just 96 bn USD

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 days ago

                Stock valuation has nothing to do with the current conversation but billionaires shouldn’t exist at all whole homeless people exist, it’s that simple.

  • @taiyang
    link
    43 days ago

    Yes but I dehumanize rich folk and technically they’re still human. Just, you know, parasites be parasites.

  • @Professorozone
    link
    23 days ago

    I’m sorry but I think OP was a bit out of line. Elon Musk for example has billions of dollars but is looking to give himself BILLIONS and benefits. FTFY.