• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I have a different strategy, it’s called 3210:

    3 TB of data at stake

    split between 2 drives

    only 1 copy

    0 shids given

  • Nat (she/they)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 month ago

    For anyone who needs to hear this: RAID is not a backup. RAID is not a backup.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 month ago

      It’s why the paid services are successful. Another option I heard about is to have a “data buddy” so you both install a NAS at each other’s house, sort out access etc and that’s your off-site.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      Yeah. My solution is raspberry pi w/WireGuard + HDD at inlaws. Initial backup was done locally, nightly backups rsync’d over (I don’t generate a ton of data, so it’s mostly just photos from my phone).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          We “only” have ~35Mbps upload, but that’s plenty since the initial backup was the only large transfer. Daily backup transfers are generally pretty small for me.

          But getting the initial transfer done locally was definitely important for my use case!

            • ferret
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 month ago

              You probably don’t generate more than 4 megabits of backup-worthy data on average every second

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                230 days ago

                Exactly — this is ~10GB every 6 hours (which is probably a reasonable amount of time to run a backup while not interfering with active Internet use).

                Basically the only backup-worthy content I generate is casual photos and videos, and these are nowhere near that size (Immich database backups also take up a bit but I could certainly be smarter about how I handle these backups).

  • @nycki
    link
    91 month ago

    who can afford that though?

    • Forbo
      link
      fedilink
      330 days ago

      It’s not all that expensive. The cost of storage is constantly decreasing over time. You can get a safe deposit box for something like $10/year if you also want the added benefit of an offline copy. I haven’t looked at cloud storage pricing, so I dunno what that runs.

    • qazM
      link
      English
      227 days ago

      It’s not the expensive. I have about 150GB backed up and it costs about $1 a month

  • NickwithaC
    link
    English
    61 month ago

    I have three copies, one on my nvme SSD one on my sata SSD and one in my OneDrive account which I can only assume is HDDs on the other end so I’m probably doing it right.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 month ago

    For home use it’s decent enough to have 2 copies, and 1 off-site.

    Especially if 1 of your copies has some kind of redundancy, like RAID 1.

  • ddh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    330 days ago

    Just realised my primary, backup and offsites are all spinning platter disks. When they say two types of storage, what does that mean exactly?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      330 days ago

      Differing kinda of storage in case one doesn’t work with the device being restored to, or something happens that’s more likely to affect one type of media than the other. A strong electrical field could scramble the hell out of spinning rust’s magnetic media, while doing nothing to optical media, for example.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 month ago

    I just keep one copy on my main PC and a backup on my Nextcloud (which is also at home) and occasionally I may download a copy to my phone