The campaign squandered a whole lot of money and made plenty of people rich. Parts of the Democratic operation seem more like a multi-level marketing scheme (MLM) than a political movement.
  • SkilurosEnglish
    0•5 hours ago

    This is a bit a of tangent, but I’ve read some of the author’s takes on russia and China (and briefly discussed the articles with him on twitter) and he has no clue what he is talking about. The “articles” are sophomoric takes that clearly show a lack of knowledge or interest in understanding anything.

    He might have a better understanding of US internal politics, but his confidently ignorant approach (with respect to russia and China) does not inspire confidence.

  • @DomeGuy
    14•14 hours ago

    Very little, at least.compared to the opposition.

    It was infested with myopic tomfoolery of a scale that can easily be described as “corrupt”, but i haven’t heard and specific allegations of anyone actually trying to lose.

    • @Ensign_CrabEnglish
      3•5 hours ago

      at least.compared to the opposition.

      Can we please stop doing this? It just gives Democrats license to be second worst.

    • @[email protected]
      5•12 hours ago

      Democratic political consultants milked the campaign for a shitload of money and likely led the charge to “pivot conservative so you don’t lose!”

      It’s bullshit to assume it was corrupt by design, however.

  • @just_another_person
    6•13 hours ago

    The arguments laid out here are about a campaign that had no time to scale, and therefore didn’t have time to properly set up field offices. I doubt they even had the staff or procedures to properly set up requests coming from thousands of field offices. I’d say this was more of a failure of the Biden campaign’s initial setup than anything, since that is what the Harris campaign stemmed from.