• @otacon239
    link
    783 months ago

    “I have nothing to hide” until the government decides what you are and always have been has suddenly become a crime. Now all those years of “not hiding” makes conviction guaranteed.

    • @Randelung
      link
      45
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The whole abortion thing in the US is pretty perfect to demonstrate that argument. You can assume that you have nothing to hide in the current political situation of your country, but say that somehow changes and they define you as the outgroup and suddenly things are very different. I wouldn’t want a cryptographic backdoor in my messenger, then. Looking at you, EU

      Or assume you’re visiting China or some other country with strong opinions on how you’re allowed to speak of the ruling party. Or some religious extremist country that doesn’t like women. Or one where drug cartels pull the strings and they may think you have valuable skills. (I think I’m approaching 3/4 of the world.)

      Which leads to an interesting conclusion. The argument “I have nothing to hide” is very first world problem-y. It’s a luxury that we can afford to not look behind our figurative backs all the time.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      38
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That’s a suspicious mole… Your health insurance premium will be adjusted accordingly.

    • ddh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      Yes, but we can’t see the inside

      • DebatableRaccoon
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        Hides airport scanner under a sheet. This? No, don’t worry, it’s just a telephone box.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    133 months ago

    Instead of “I have nothing to hide,” we should be thinking, “I have nothing to show.” Privacy should be the default.

  • @Dasus
    link
    113 months ago

    I have nothing to hide, but I understand how important it is for me to be able to hide something should I need to.

    Privacy needs to be possible.

      • @Dasus
        link
        23 months ago

        Well sure, but to what degree, that’s sort of different.

        People argued hard against a census when it was introduced, but we our modern systems require information of the populace.

        As long as the government isn’t corrupt as fuck and doesn’t excessively pry into the lives of it’s private citizens, I’m okay.

        But then we face the issue on not a single government filling that criteria.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          I’m okay.

          I’m not. Any given entity should have the minimum information necessary to perform its function.

          Look at everyone freaking out when the regime changes, and then the next time they regain control, they again support even more expansion of power. And then the regime changes again and they’re worried about abuse of power again.

          Don’t trust an org because it’s benevolent today. Management changes, breaches happen, etc. An org should only have the info it actually needs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 months ago

    I think the “problem” with privacy is it is new and people have not evolved with the concept. Think about it we grew evolved from tribes to towns and in those generations everyone knew everyone and what was happening. Hell multi bedroom dwellings are a fairly new idea and people had multiple kids.

  • @Alexstarfire
    link
    13 months ago

    I have nothing to hide, but I’m gonna do it anyway cause everyone doesn’t need to know.