• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    54 hours ago

    Haha now I kinda feel like this is Endeavour. I’m really liking Endeavour! It feels like Arch but just a bit smoother of an approachability curve. Lovely community, too.

    I should mess with Void sometime. 🤔

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      23 hours ago

      It’s more like Arch than Endeavour though, just a heads up. Very little GUI things, especially the installer and all that. Well, the installed is TUI, so It’s not that hard to be honest.

  • @EuroNutellaMan
    link
    610 hours ago

    Could someone remind me what the appeal behind Void is exactly?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3620 hours ago

    As one of the dozens of Void Linux users, I too find this very offensive!

    (But hey, at least we’re getting some attention, which is nice…)

    • @sazey
      link
      3821 hours ago

      I use manjaro and you said nothing but facts.

      • @trxxruraxvr
        link
        1920 hours ago

        I just quit Manjaro about two months ago and i agree.

        • Ignotum
          link
          716 hours ago

          I haven’t tried Manjaro and I don’t have an opinion

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3221 hours ago

    You’re using the meme wrong. The “at home” needs to be worse than the “mom can we get?”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4022 hours ago

    I don’t agree with it being a cheap version of arch, it works too good for that, it deserves more respect

  • Cris
    link
    English
    5224 hours ago

    Frankly I’d much rather have void. Super cool distro, a lot of things about it seem like an ideal fit for me, I just don’t really have the technical skill to get a minimal distro all set up the way I want it

    Plus their logo is pretty. Which shouldn’t matter but like, look at it- it’s a cool logo!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      420 hours ago

      Yes, the install process is difficult to perform. But once you do it, you’ll feel like a wizard. You learn so much from the process if you do a manual chroot install. It helps you understand how the installation process for other distros like Debian works. If you have some free time, I would recommend trying it in a virtual machine.

      • Cris
        link
        English
        219 hours ago

        I tried when I set up my new laptop and definitely learned a ton, but eventually stalled at getting network manager setup so I could use GNOME settings to configure networks, and getting sound set up

        I completely forgot about trying it in a VM, I may have to go give that a try!

        If it had package kit implementation so I could use a graphical package manager/app store it’d basically be my perfect distro if I could get it set up the way I want. An independent distro, super elegant, if I understand right the packages are all vanilla, “stable rolling release”. I really like it, a minimal distro is just a bit beyond me skill-wise, and I’d miss having a way to browse native (non-flatpak) applications graphically

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Sorry to hear about the network manager issues! I could be wrong on this, but I think Gnome is not the best supported DE in void - possibly because of how heavily tied it is to systemd. I wish I could help, but I still configure my wifi using wpa_supplicant.conf. Maybe dbus wasn’t setup properly?

          Regarding audio, the pipewire documentation for Void is pretty good. It’s pretty thematic of the whole Void linux experience: you have to read the handbook and follow its steps closely, but it’s very well written and easy to understand. It can definitely be time-consuming as well though.

          Void is definitely all the things you mentioned. I installed it on a few machines, the first in early 2020 and it has never given me an issue. Extremely stable and boring. I’m impressed that it has so many packages in its repository, but that’s a testament to how well xbps is written. But there are a few things missing since it’s fair from the mainstream, including packagekit. I had never heard of it before you mentioned it - I found a fork on github to support it, but it doesn’t look very well maintained.

  • @brap
    link
    1722 hours ago

    How dare you.

  • @Cort
    link
    1522 hours ago

    Was I supposed to be paying for arch this whole time?

    • @ikidd
      link
      English
      34 hours ago

      Oh, you paid for it, don’t worry.

  • @Peasley
    link
    6
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I’m always baffled when people use void as a desktop. Anyone do this?

      • @DoeJohn
        link
        615 hours ago

        rolling, stable

        Huh?

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Yep, believe it or not, it’s probably the most stable rolling release distro out there. I’ve used it for the past 4, 5 years or so, not once has it broken.

          There are 2 main reasons why this is. One, they don’t roll with bleeding edge, they opt for stable, so cutting edge is more like it. And two, they don’t have something like the AUR. There is only the main repo and that’s it. The approval process for new packages is quite strict and it has to fulfil a lot of requirements, among which the software has to not just build, but also run on i686, x86_64, ARMv5/6/7 and ARM64. And not just on glibc, but also on musl. So basically, all that, times 2. Sometimes it may take up to a year to get new packages approved by the maintainers, depending on how big the package is and how integrated in the system it is.

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    218 hours ago

    It was Antergos for me, before the project was shut down.