• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    611 month ago

    Man I hope they can’t find an impartial jury to try this guy, but I know they’ll find 12 bastards.

    • @eran_morad
      link
      331 month ago

      All it takes is 1 guy who says the right bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      i bet they’ll change the venue to the federal circuit so that they can move it to a red state where there’s plenty of boot lickers.

      • @WraithGear
        link
        English
        161 month ago

        Funny enough, a lot of the right also like the guy for what he did.

        • @Lennny
          link
          25
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That’s because most red voters actually think blue, they’re just too fucking dumb to know.

          • @SkyezOpen
            link
            229 days ago

            Too fucking true. Describe any left leaning principle without using any buzzwords and they’ll agree all day.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 month ago

          fortunately so.

          i suspect that there’s a high prevalence of boot licking among rightists; hence my comment moving to a red state.

    • @Kyrgizion
      link
      121 month ago

      A jury comprised entirely of C-suite people would probably do the job. They’re undoubtedly going to try this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        181 month ago

        Not a lawyer, but I’d hope there would be an argument against this since a jury of c-suite people would not be his peers.

        • @zigmus64
          link
          101 month ago

          The prosecution and defense have to agree on the jury makeup if I understand the process correctly…

  • @LotrOrc
    link
    521 month ago

    Well if all his peers think he’s okay I guess they gotta let him go

  • queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    151 month ago

    If they can’t find an impartial jury I’m pretty sure they’ll just give him the Epstein treatment.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 month ago

      Have Trump’s DOJ turn a blind eye on the prisoner on suicide watch on the eve of his trial, where he is expected to name names? I’m not sure killing Luigi, or letting him take his own life, and making him a martyr instead of an “example” is really a great play for them.

      • @ThePyroPython
        link
        71 month ago

        But it’s a roll of the dice and what are the odds on killing Luigi triggering civil unrest that spirals out of control?

        If they think the odds are low enough they’ll do it.

        The Americans should make it clear that killing Luigi will result in mass riots and the killing of more CEOs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        There are piles of dead martyrs, entire families with their own personal martyrs. Throwing another one on the pile is nothing to them, they’ve weathered it before. Him getting to make his case at trial and the chance he could successfully acquit himself creates far more unfamiliar and frightening possibilities. I am almost certain a trial is the worst possible outcome for those who feel threatened by Luigi’s actions.

  • @kitnaht
    link
    141 month ago

    I know there’s no way he gets off scot free; he’s not a member of the corporate elite. But I can hope.

  • CrimeDad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 month ago

    If only the CEOs realized their vulnerability and that none of them could individually improve their image without going against shareholder interests, so they appealed to the government for blanket regulations to limit exploitation.