• @LotrOrc
    link
    4916 hours ago

    Well if all his peers think he’s okay I guess they gotta let him go

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5517 hours ago

    Man I hope they can’t find an impartial jury to try this guy, but I know they’ll find 12 bastards.

    • @eran_morad
      link
      3217 hours ago

      All it takes is 1 guy who says the right bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      i bet they’ll change the venue to the federal circuit so that they can move it to a red state where there’s plenty of boot lickers.

      • @WraithGear
        link
        English
        1215 hours ago

        Funny enough, a lot of the right also like the guy for what he did.

        • @Lennny
          link
          16
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          That’s because most red voters actually think blue, they’re just too fucking dumb to know.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          615 hours ago

          fortunately so.

          i suspect that there’s a high prevalence of boot licking among rightists; hence my comment moving to a red state.

    • @Kyrgizion
      link
      1215 hours ago

      A jury comprised entirely of C-suite people would probably do the job. They’re undoubtedly going to try this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1714 hours ago

        Not a lawyer, but I’d hope there would be an argument against this since a jury of c-suite people would not be his peers.

        • @zigmus64
          link
          914 hours ago

          The prosecution and defense have to agree on the jury makeup if I understand the process correctly…

  • queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    1616 hours ago

    If they can’t find an impartial jury I’m pretty sure they’ll just give him the Epstein treatment.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      816 hours ago

      Have Trump’s DOJ turn a blind eye on the prisoner on suicide watch on the eve of his trial, where he is expected to name names? I’m not sure killing Luigi, or letting him take his own life, and making him a martyr instead of an “example” is really a great play for them.

      • @ThePyroPython
        link
        615 hours ago

        But it’s a roll of the dice and what are the odds on killing Luigi triggering civil unrest that spirals out of control?

        If they think the odds are low enough they’ll do it.

        The Americans should make it clear that killing Luigi will result in mass riots and the killing of more CEOs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        414 hours ago

        There are piles of dead martyrs, entire families with their own personal martyrs. Throwing another one on the pile is nothing to them, they’ve weathered it before. Him getting to make his case at trial and the chance he could successfully acquit himself creates far more unfamiliar and frightening possibilities. I am almost certain a trial is the worst possible outcome for those who feel threatened by Luigi’s actions.

  • @kitnaht
    link
    1316 hours ago

    I know there’s no way he gets off scot free; he’s not a member of the corporate elite. But I can hope.

  • CrimeDad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    916 hours ago

    If only the CEOs realized their vulnerability and that none of them could individually improve their image without going against shareholder interests, so they appealed to the government for blanket regulations to limit exploitation.