Summary

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stated that Russia rejects a weak ceasefire in Ukraine, instead seeking a legally binding peace deal ensuring the security of Russia and its neighbors.

Lavrov accused the West of using truces to re-arm Ukraine and called for agreements preventing future violations.

President Putin expressed readiness for talks with Trump but ruled out territorial concessions or Ukraine’s NATO membership, a key Russian concern.

Ukraine remains committed to pursuing NATO membership despite Russia’s objections.

  • @Treczoks
    link
    English
    14 hours ago

    No, it must not. At least not before it returns all the occupied areas, submits the perpetrators to the court of international justice, and pays reparations for their aggressions. Then we can talk about securities.

  • Flying SquidM
    link
    English
    1352 days ago

    Your security was not an issue until you invaded Ukraine. You didn’t want NATO on your border (even though it already was there in Kaliningrad)? Now you have it.

    No one was talking about Finland joining NATO until you invaded Ukraine. Ukraine itself wasn’t pursuing NATO membership until you invaded.

    • @snekerpimp
      link
      English
      682 days ago

      “Now that I’m done beating the shit out of you, what guarantee do I have that you won’t fight back, because that would just be mean”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      472 days ago

      Kaliningrad

      Also Poland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Canada (if you don’t count the Arctic).

      The idea that Ukraine joining NATO made any kind of difference to Russia’s security is absolutely ludicrous.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          242 days ago

          Yeah, exactly.

          It genuinely worries me that people struggle to see through bullshit this obvious.

          • socsa
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 days ago

            Literally nobody who isn’t just a Russian troll is confused by this.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 days ago

              No, sadly I’ve seen a lot of well meaning leftists get caught up in this bullshit. Not denying that Russian trolls have been intentionally spreading their talking points, but I’ve also seen them repeated by far too many people who should know better.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  7
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  IRL and online. It happens way too often.

                  A big part of it is that a lot of modern leftists were kind of forged in the post 9/11 culture and the reaction against Bush’s forever wars, and they in turn inherited much of their political conscience from elder leftists who were forged in the Nixon years and the reaction against the Vietnam war.

                  So its become a kind of fait a complit on the left that being anti-war and anti American Imperialism is always good and necessary. And those are good positions to hold, but the problem is that people don’t come to them through interrogative thought. They’re just sort of handed to you as part of your welcome package. So when presented with a scenario where supporting the continuation of a military conflict - even when that support aligns you with the interests of US global influence - is actually a moral good, a lot of these people really struggle to break free of their own thought terminating cliches.

                  The Ukraine conflict simply does not fit into the same boxes that they’re used to sorting ideas into, and because, by and large, most leftists detest war on a purely moral level (understandable, no one should be overjoyed at the notion of vast destruction of human life, though a depressingly large number of people are) they simply haven’t spent enough time interrogating these ideas to have built a framework to handle complex cases like this.

                  Russia very carefully frames their propaganda to exploit these moral conflicts. NATO is a military alliance, ergo “NATO bad”. America is an imperialist power, ergo anything that serves American interests is bad. Military conflicts lead to unacceptable loss of life, ergo anything which prolongs a conflict is bad. These are easy answers to complicated problems, so people naturally latch onto them.

      • TimeSquirrel
        link
        fedilink
        102 days ago

        That was just the excuse. Ukraine is a mineral-rich breadbasket. They had stuff Russia wants. Simple as that. Just like the US invading Iraq had nothing to do with “spreading democracy”.

    • @chonglibloodsport
      link
      English
      102 days ago

      Russia’s security wasn’t at issue but the regime’s security was. Russia is like the regimes from 1984: they need constant external threats to wage war against in order to distract the opposition at home.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1032 days ago

    Lavrov accused the West of using truces to re-arm Ukraine and called for agreements preventing future violations.

    Russia wants time to rearm, but doesn’t want the people they’re attacking doing the same thing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    302 days ago

    You find a way to force Russia to hand all their nuclear weapons to NATO and you got yourself a deal. Ukraine will even promise not to invade Russia once that is done.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 days ago

    I’m sure we can give the same security guarantees Ukraine got, in exchange for Russia similarly giving up its nuclear weapons.

  • socsa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 days ago

    Bro, literally nobody is threatening Russia besides you clowns.

  • @DicJacobus
    link
    English
    112 days ago

    I’ve carefully considered Russia’s concerns and security, and after 3 years I’ve ultimately decided that I don’t give a fuck about Genocidal Fascist Warmonger’s Fee-fees.

    Ukraine’s sovereingty doesn’t end where Russian hurt feelings begin.

    • @middlemanSI
      link
      English
      06 hours ago

      I don’t think “genocidal” should be used here. Israel is doing it to Palestinians but I don’t think Russia invading Ukraine is the same. War crimes for sure…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 hours ago

        Aren’t they kidnapping children for “reeducation” and whatnot…? I think that counts as genocide…

        And even if they weren’t (currently) doing it in Ukraine they’ve been doing it elsewhere, like in Chechnya…

        And, well, genocides, pogroms, and whatnot have been a Russian tradition for a long time… Ukraine in particular still remembers Stalin’s holodomor, and the deportation of the Crimean Tatars…

        Hell, if there’s such a thing as unintentional genocide or genocide by incompetence they’ve probably been doing it to themselves for centuries… “… and then things got worse” and all that…

  • Prior_Industry
    link
    English
    202 days ago

    Code for: no NATO for Ukraine, we get some time to build up and have another crack in a few years

  • goatsarah
    link
    fedilink
    392 days ago

    @MicroWave Hey Russia, you could try not invading people if you’re worried about them fighting back?

    Delusional nonsense from Moscow as usual.

  • @kreskin
    link
    English
    42 days ago

    Just a whore arguing over the price. The most natural thing in the world for a Russian politician.