• @aaaantoine
    link
    491 year ago

    That’s a really good illustration of scale. The last time i saw a demo like this it used 3D rendered cubes. There’s something wonderful about using an actual, physical medium for this.

    • @Mog_fanatic
      link
      251 year ago

      I love illustrations like this cause at a certain point numbers just don’t work for most people. Like yeah everybody knows $3 million is a lot money. But the average person doesn’t realize just how gigantic that number actually is in reference to the average person. You bump that up to $150 billion for someone like bezos and it’s literally an inconceivably big number. It all just falls under the category of “a lot” until you see stuff like this.

      • @Tuss
        link
        41 year ago

        It would be a nice experiment to go out in public and make it into a social experiment.

        Maybe have a glass box with Bezos amount of rice in it. Put a table cloth on top of it. Put a reasonable size pile of rice on the cloth lets say a tenth of his actual amount. And then ask people to pick up as many handfuls of rice they think Bezos has compared to the single $100k piece of rice. Then show them how utterly wrong they were.

    • @HAL_9000
      link
      61 year ago

      All sizes in this video are easily comprehensible. I can grasp a grain of rice. I can grasp a couple and a portion I would eat. A portion my whole family would have for dinner and then a portion a restaurant might use in a busy hour.

      With the cube videos it’s mostly “This is a cube of 1m³.” Which is already hard to encounter IRL and have a good concept of. But then it becomes “now all cubes cover the area of Manhattan higher than the Burj Khalifa”. Yeah, those are sizes we know but that are astounding precisely because we cannot really grasp their vastness or tallness.

    • @SuperApples
      link
      191 year ago

      For efficiency, yes, for dramatic effect, no.

    • @DulyNoted
      link
      11 year ago

      I mean, he clearly did. He even provided the final weight.

    • @Tuss
      link
      11 year ago

      Weigh a small portion, count it, weigh a bigger portion and weigh to see if the weight/amount ratio stays about the same and then weigh the rest.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Lamborghini, California house… How about “I need surgery” or “I want to go to college.” That’s a grain or two of rice, but most people don’t even have one. It’s gross that we worship these people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Well yes and no. I assume most (if not all) of Europe has free health care and in most part also free higher education. The joke is how expensive those things actually are, which we wouldn’t know because we don’t pay for it (at least not directly), but the not joke part is that they actually know how much things cost because that’s the sad reality in the US. At least that’s what I’ve read, I don’t actually know the intricacies of their health care, I just know some people skip going to the doctor because it’s going to cost them a fortune.

  • karmiclychee
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I kind of lose the comparison to the same psychological manhole you get from pure numbers. I wonder if the effect would have been improved by starting with some arbitrarily sized pile of rice for bezos money and then trying to divide it downwards (to where you’re scraping the side of a single grain with an exacto for some dust, or looking through a microscope)

    Kind of like a “and then there’s you” effect

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I have a feeling this was “inspired” by that original video. Uses the same $100,000 increments + the example of how little you would notice buying a Lamborghini

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Nice!

    I was thinking halfway through, “man I’m good if you just want to weigh it…” but the counting out time lapse did add something.

    The one with rice I like was for exponential increases in size. Story: guy goes to the ruler of the kingdom and gets the ruler to agree to give him 1 grain of rice on the first square chess board, doubling every square so then two on the next, four on the next and so on. Runs the kingdom out of rice before he gets to the end of the chess board.

    Another good one for the 1000x scaling is time. People seem to be able to grasp time magnitudes better than money. 1 million seconds is 12 days. 1 billion seconds is 32 years. 1 Trillion seconds is 31,688 years.

    • AlteredStateBlob
      link
      fedilink
      401 year ago

      People really need to learn that you have almost infinite leverage and credit with net worth and wealth like Bezos. Man will never have to spend a cent of his own illiquid assets and will live like an emperor until he dies still.

    • @jpreston2005
      link
      181 year ago

      people need to learn that 99% of the populations health, education, freedom, and happiness is being actively sabotaged by 1% of the people. If that 1% was anyone but the rich and powerful, we’d have done something about it by now. You shilling for our continued subservience is pathetic.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Facts before feelings. Many of the people here downvoting me genuinely think people like Bezos or Musk are just sitting in a pile of cash choosing to hoard money instead of helping the less fortunate.

        Also - you’re part of the 1%

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Musk managed to get his hands on $44 billion to buy twitter pretty easily. They may not be sitting on a literal pile of cash, but the ultra-wealthy can always get easy access to it.

          And Bezos had a take home amount of $4 billion in 2019, not his stock, his take home cash for one year. That’s an absurd amount of money.