Why the hell would you wait to find out? That’s date #1 material right there.
Back in the day, women needed a man, so you were supposed to focus on catching one instead of on weeding out the overly sensitive ones.
And it wasn’t that long ago. I knew a grandmother who had gone to college to get her degree in doing housewife stuff, which was a common method for catching a man. Gross stuff.
I mean women couldn’t even have bank accounts until like the 60’s and I’m fairly certain it was in the 70’s before it became commonly done.
I have to navigate all the way back to my mother in my family tree to find the first women that lived while not being allowed to have a bank account in the US.
Dude was a snowflake before it was cool
So like a drop of water?
epicface.png
“If there’s anything I can’t stand, it’s touchy bois! Back to momma, chop chop there’s a good lad.”
You’ll never get that woman out of her pants with that attitude!
Before realizing what instance this was posted in, I thought “I bet this was taken out of context.”
Good to know my brain still works. Occasionally.
Also, now sub’d.
I thought people then were sexually repressed and conservative, but he went straight to the point.
But on the other hand, women without pants…
Idiot-filter, in wearable form!
But smoking indoors probably isn’t a red flag
That sounds like the best way to find how he feels about them.
I’ll fuck her for him. I think women in pants are hot.
Goodness wild how recent (what year exactly?) that era
Judging by the artwork, this could easily be 60s, which is nearly three quarters of a century ago.
I don’t think it’s that wild considering how the world worked back then.
