• knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Koreans on both sides of the DMZ have more in common than they do differences. Unfortunately the comprador regime in the south and their handlers in Washington can’t have anyone noticing that.

    • Zyansheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      How does one even count similarities and differences? What does it even mean to say there are more of one than the other?

      • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Of all the semantic hair splitting distractions, that’s what you go for?

        Go study philosophy or something. I’ll wait for something substantive.

  • Kes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Unfortunately the current situation appeases the global powers the most. China and Russia will not stand to have a US allied united Korea so close to Beijing and Vladivostok, which means a united Korea is a neutral, non US aligned Korea, which the US does not want. Having North Korea be a buffer state between China/Russia and the US aligned South Korea is the most stable option, and as a result North Korea knows that it can do whatever it wants and still be propped up by Beijing, just as it has since the Korean war

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyzBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    There’s no point in negotiating with a dictator whose primary goal is to remain in power. A peaceful end to the conflict means the death of Kim at the hands of the oppressed.

    This is like asking a kidnapper to kindly release the hostages or we will ask again later.

    • lntl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      Glad you’re not in charge. Currently, there is tension between Korean allies which unfortunately means there will be no peace for the Korean people.

      I think with time, Korea can be peacefully reunified. It may not be in my lifetime, but one day I believe it will happen. As time move forward, new events and opportunites arise that may present the chance for reunification.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        The problem with North Korea is that its entire cultural identity is built on resisting American aggression. Without having an enemy to fight, what is the reason for the country going on? Why would the people of North Korea tolerate the current government other than to resist invasion?

        The North Korean regime needs conflict. It doesn’t need war, but it needs conflict. Kim could have gotten a sweetheart deal from Trump to end the war and never took it. Why? Because getting rid of the “American threat” also gets rid of North Korea’s legitimacy.

  • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Don’t even know why that was even an option, anyway. NK isn’t ever going to cooperate with its “enemies” and will just continue to indoctrinate its population with propaganda.

    The only solution is a military invasion of NK. Always has been.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      The only solution is a military invasion of NK. Always has been.

      The US always could have not disrupted the planned elections and installed a military dictatorship that kept a lot of the Japanese colonial officers around and started mass killing Koreans. Then the democratic korea wouldn’t have had to try to liberate their country.

      • patchymoose@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        Well yes, you are definitely exaggerating if you are suggesting that half the planet is a ‘death cult’. Maybe if you want to say that the foreign policy establishment in certain countries is, then it would be a more reasonable statement.

        I don’t think that “the West” is even a useful term.

        • freagle@lemmygrad.mlBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Lol, news flash. Western white people are not half the planet. Never have been. They are a significant minority.

          You don’t get to decide if the West is a useful term. You have to listen to the global majority on that. And they demonstrate it’s utility by using it.

          The foreign policy establishment is tiny. There are millions of people screaming at their TVs, lynching black people, shooting protestors, buying guns, watching and producing military propaganda movies, watching and producing TV shows about hero white people killing Asiatic hordes, celebrating the European genocide against indigenous people, calling water protectors terrorists, baying for the blood of Iranians, Russians, Chinese… Millions who thinks dropping nukes on population centers was the best course of action. That vacation in Vietnam and marvel at how backwards they are and don’t think Kissinger is that bad.

          It’s not like you and your family and friends and countrymen are just normal people who weren’t raised for 20 years on genocidal indoctrination by your parents, grandparents, teachers, books, TVs, movies, politicians, historians, memorials, and religions. You just don’t think you were.

          It’s not the foreign policy establishment. It’s the entire European project for the last 600 years. You don’t get out of it by just saying “it’s only the power elite”. If the US had a popular revolt, I guarantee you that it would result in major mass killings of the marginalized, because despite your fantasy, the majority of Americans are part of the death cult.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Your perspective being shared by bloodthirsty us officials is why the drpk has and is justified in having nukes

  • Addfwyn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    The South’s current government is ridiculously conservative. Rolling back labour laws and women’s rights were pillars of their election run. They’ll do whatever the US tells them to. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that peaceful diplomacy is not at the forefront of their mind.

    It’s honestly pretty cyclical, they bounce back and forth between more diplomatic minded leadership and more warhungry. They are much more in the antagonistic phase of their cycle right now.

    • AEHNH@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Weird how the “unstable dictatorship” is the more consistent one in this relationship