- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
And then they’ll get Worcester
This makes no sense as a Brit cause it’s pronounced “Wuster”.
Which in turn doesn’t make any sense itself. Huzzah!
I get what you’re saying here, but when you write it like that I can only think ‘wust’ rhyming with ‘rust’ (like someone with a lisp saying ruster). But it’s more like whu-stuh
For any time t with worseness w(t) there exists some time t_0 < t where worseness was less, w(t_0) < w(t). Proof: duh.
