dont feed the trolls people, its that simple, they want you to interact with them, they need you to interact with them.
This is evidenced by anything that turns into a right wing echo chamber where all the liberals and leftists have bailed… Eventually all the right wingers get bored and to places like Bluesky because they don’t actually have anyone to troll and harass anymore.
kid named downvotes are disabled in my instance for some fuckign reason:
because downvotes were used on reddit to suppress trans voices
that makes sense
The entire point of blahaj is to protect queers, especially trans. If you see it as over protective that’s totally fair, and feel free to find a different instance! It’s part of why Lemmy is great :)
didnt ask but thanks! i know how fedi instances work
Rude
if wanted to be mansplained about a platform i’ve been involved with for 8 years now i would be on lemmy.world sorry
It’s well known why downvotes are disabled. From your comment it looked like you didn’t know. It’s reasonable to comment how it works in that situation imo.
Edit: Trying to be more polite
mh yeah my bad, didn’t mean to sound so abrasive.
you’re right i didn’t know the reason (or rather, i remember the reason a long time ago being something along the lines of “we disabled downvotes to improve conversation”, so that may be a memory issue on my part). i would have interpreted the first reply more charitably if it weren’t for the “blahaj is to protect queers, feel free to move instances :)” as if i wasn’t a transfem who’s been on fedi (and other sites) for a while now and seen her fair share of shit thrown at her.
That makes sense.
Removed by mod
yknow what, you made me realize how much my admin works to block dipshits like you, i should appreciate her more
thank you for that, enjoy the block <3
Removed by mod
yeah sorry 😅 you gotta block and ignore extra hard then
That’s how it’s done. Don’t interact, block them, move on with your day
And report them if the content is against the rules
You mean if they don’t post before they leave?
hi spujb. was reminded of this one the hard way yesterday :(
hi kate. yeah :( it comes at you quicker and less obvious than you might think sometimes. but we live and learn from experience :3
as an instance admin i can see who has voted on anything which i think makes it easier sometimes to tell who’s arguing in bad faith but yk you can’t see that until you’ve already written a comment ;-)
I think it depends on the type of “troll” tbh. The traditional kind, looking to get a rise out of people for amusement? Sure, they need you to interact, and starving them of that attention kills the point. But nowadays we also use that term for people trying to shape public discourse in a dishonest fashion, such as when governments attempt to manipulate foreign public opinion, or politically motivated people pretend to be a different position in order to discredit it.
These kinds are slightly different I think, because their goal isnt necessarily to get a rise out of people, just getting seen enough times is enough to normalize their message in people’s heads.
For that kind, it might be a good idea to present a counter-narrative, so that people that come across them dont subconsciously get the idea that the troll’s message is one with wide public support. You wont change their mind by arguing with them of course, but that just means that the point is not to change their mind, but to drown them out essentially.
Nah, you just reply with the clown emoji and move on.
Ehhhh, nope tbh. Disengage, downvote, report for all trolls. You have the right instinct but here’s why:
their goal isnt necessarily to get a rise out of people, just getting seen enough times is enough
Correct. And responding to trolls who have this need increases views by making the thread longer, by bumping up the thread in some sorting algorithms, and by generating meta-commentary in different posts or communities. Responding to trolls gets them seen.
If you can absolutely handle not letting it become an argument, straightforward “fact check” comments that keep it short and sweet can be effective. But if you truly suspect a troll, paragraphs of lengthy response will often encourage responses and draw other trolls like a magnet.
Keep it simple. Handle with care. Block if you can’t trust yourself to keep it in hand.
The trouble is, these sorts of trolls will take no issue with simply replying to themselves on multiple accounts, gaming engagement algorithms by buying popular accounts or stealing popular content, etc. Theyre almost certainly going to get the visibility they want either way, if they know what they’re doing.
Hence I think that it is important to visibly show dissent against them, especially if you get enough people in a community to do it as to leave them visibly in the minority (okay, moderation would be even better, but the viability of that depends a lot on the space), to combat the effect wherein people go along with views that they perceive as being typical of those around them. Such a thing isnt truly an argument, at least not a good faith one.
I get where you’re coming from, im just not really convinced that it works as well as the conventional wisdom about trolls suggests.
Visibly show dissent simply and precisely, and I agree. If you show dissent and a chain of comments follows, you have failed.
Just wanting to be very specific here because I know many have the instinct to respond with stinging satire and commitment to defending the right thing. That’s a natural reaction! But it is textbook troll feeding and will always make things worse.
