• JackbyDev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Literally never heard about this event before today.

    • RimuOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 hours ago

      I’m not wed to the logo, by any means

  • marcie (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Seems like an asshole/ego move to fork Lemmy rather than contribute to it when Lemmy is an ongoing project

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        98 hours ago

        Yes, it is generally good, but if we want a viable alternative to the sub-based AI platform, then we need more users, not more platforms.

        • ferret
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 hours ago

          The platforms are federated and use the same protocol, it doesn’t matter

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 hours ago

          Normally I’d agree, but the recent increase in popularity of Pixelfed among the TikTok crowd has shown me that it’s possible for one fediverse platform to succeed where a competing one failed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Ignoring the fact piefed isn’t a lemmy fork.

      Are you really going to argue that forking an existing project because you want to take it a different way is an asshole move?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        49 hours ago

        I’m fine with it whilst there are maintainers with the whole “transgenderism is bourgeoise decadence” stance going on. I’ve happily worked with MLs and MLMs, I’m not a fan of bigots who work backwards to fit their ideology to their prejudices.

    • fxomt
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Mainly because it’s too popular, we need to diversify with mbin/piefed.

      Also, because piefed has more features (we don’t even have polls on lemmy yet, why?) and i think it’s more beginner friendly.

      That’s just my opinion though, all of them are better than reddit eitherway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        817 hours ago

        While that is a reasonable motivation, I’d be more worried about potential fracturing of the marketshare, preventing the critical mass to be reached for smaller ones, while keeping the bigger ones from reaching full potential.

        The flame dying out for kbin comes to mind. Mastodon probably saw this and decided they need to up their game.

        If we’re talking about feature, wouldn’t it be better to improve on the existing?

        I’m definitely not an expert on this, but I find it concerning the massive closed players keep getting all the pies while preying on the players on the verse, waiting to see some weakness to prey on.

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 hours ago

          The flame dying out for kbin comes to mind.

          That wasn’t because of adoption, that was because the main dev ran into health issues. Or at least I was under the impression of that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            16 minutes ago

            Assuming what you said is true, this would highlight the fact that kbin was pretty much entirely ran by a single person. Otherwise, someone else would readily take over.

        • fxomt
          link
          fedilink
          216 hours ago

          I (personally ofc) think that goes against the spirit of the fediverse. See lemmy.world for example; anyone can argue that lemmy.world is good for the fediverse since it’s an easy choice for beginners to make, but in the long term it will harm everyone in general, since it just becomes centralized.

          I think it makes sense that lemmy and mastodon are the most popular but i don’t think it would hurt to have alternatives. I know that it’s different when it’s about an instance instead of a software (since the developers don’t have much say in running the instances in general) but it could still harm smaller projects.

          If we’re talking about feature, wouldn’t it be better to improve on the existing?

          I’m not saying lemmy shouldn’t be improved, but i was highlighting that it can be frustrating to wait for the lemmy devs to implement features that other software have implemented long time ago, and it may discourage other small devs from implementing it since “the most popular software doesn’t implement it, so no one would see/use this feature anyway”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Keeping the verse alive one way or another goes with the spirit of fediverse. The case with .world does highlight the pitfalls of having an instance so big, but it highlight its success. The pitfalls can also be mitigated by having many other instances, big and small (e.g. sh.itjust.works, blahaj, db0, sopuli, lemm.ee, all the feddit instances) that although they have different names, they share the same banner of Lemmy. This is highly successful with Mastodon.

            Speaking of the same banner, wouldn’t it be great to have many different link aggregators like lemmy, mbin, piefed, and maybe others to share the same class identity or so instead of what they currently are? This way, they all won’t be treated like competing standards despite being on their own code base and feature set. Maybe with this, forks of the original Lemmy code can be created to address the stuborness of the devs.

            Yes, I am aware ActivityPub is supposed to achieve just this, but it also does a lot of things that are not relevant and even confusing to the specific use case (e.g. link aggregator). Also, newcomers would just get frustrated with all this tech stuff and ran off to the warm embrace of big tech.

            • fxomt
              link
              fedilink
              215 hours ago

              I agree. Though my main concern was that Lemmy would gain too much control over the threads part of the fediverse it doesn’t seem to have happened yet. Its mainly a future concern for me.

              There’s nothing wrong with Lemmy or mastodon, but it’s nice JIC to have good alternatives like mbin n piefed.

              I’ve been thinking of making a project that would explain the entire fediverse (hopefully easily) and build a chooser, where it’d help by choosing a software and an instance. That is a good way to cull back a little on too much centralization IMO.

              Don’t get me wrong though, Lemmy or mastodon, I’m still happy that we’re getting more mainstream :D ultimately my points are just small criticisms.

      • @derekabutton
        link
        English
        522 hours ago

        I’ve honestly been thinking of a switch. Have you heard of any good experiences with those?

        • Fitik
          link
          fedilink
          211 hours ago

          As a MBin user, I think it depends on what you’re looking for:

          • If you want to be able to follow and interact with Mastodon users, and microblogging side of the Fediverse in general I recommend Mbin

          • If you only care about groups (communities) and interacting with them I recommend Piefed

        • cabbage
          link
          fedilink
          English
          820 hours ago

          I have been using both Mbin (Kbin before it) and Piefed quite a bit, and both are very good.

          If you want microblogging capabilities and prefer the UI, Mbin is the way to go. If you want the most robust Reddit-like experience with a bunch of quality of life improvements over Lemmy but only one UI and no apps as of now, PieFed is gold.

          I think PieFed is my favourite for the time being, as I like the UI and don’t care about apps.

        • fxomt
          link
          fedilink
          722 hours ago

          Yup, i don’t know much about kbin (it’s both a microblog and a forum, not really my taste) But piefed is great. Only thing i miss is 3rd party UIs :(

          I don’t like the UI but the features are awesome, and the developer is active. You can even directly vote for features. There’s also polls and unlike the Lemmy devs he isn’t a PTB so that’s cool too.

          Lemmy can be annoyingly slow at implementing features, here’s an example: https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/issues/181, and https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/787.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1923 hours ago

        I mean, it’s being federated to Lemmy and most of us just see the Lemmy software as the open Reddit alternative. I’m still not quite sure what Piefed is like, I’ve pretty much never had to look past Lemmy and Mastodon.

        • cabbage
          link
          fedilink
          English
          720 hours ago

          I recommend giving it a spin if you have the time! It’s pretty great :)