KEY POINTS

House Republicans are considering treating work benefits such as employer-provided transportation, free food and on-site gyms as a new source of taxable income to help pay for President Trump’s tax cuts.

These tax proposals are still in the early stages and other aspects of Trump’s tax promises would help workers, such as tax breaks on tips, overtime pay and Social Security benefits.

The concept of taxing employee perks has been debated before in Congress and never made it far, but with the size of the deficit and Trump wanting trillions of dollars in expiring and new tax cuts, some budget pay-fors will need to be found, and this one would dip into workers’ pockets.

  • @BradleyUffner
    link
    English
    1916 hours ago

    They are going to raise taxes in order to lower taxes?

    • @btaf45
      link
      49 hours ago

      The 2017 TCAJA raised taxes on all income groups under 75k to pay for gigantic tax cuts for billionaire elites.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    2519 hours ago

    If anyone says they’re surprised by this they’re either lying or complete morons.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      09 hours ago

      Everyone who votes republican should be shot dead. They’re either too stupid to be trusted, or too evil.

    • @bahbah23
      link
      1419 hours ago

      My assumption is that the employee would pay them, not the employer.

      • Pup Biru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        in australia, we call this fringe benefits tax and it’s paid by the employer. it tends to lead to employers giving less of these benefits, which was the point: it raises salary by a reasonably comenceate amount so employees receive actual wages rather than benefits that they have no choice over

        interesting side effect is that there’s some FBT stuff that doesn’t apply to charities, so you can do a thing called “salary sacrifice” (which is a well known, approved by the govt thing) where you pay some of your pre-tax salary thereby reducing your taxable income, but the charity doesn’t have to pay FBT. it’s a cheap way of providing charities with ways of incentivising their employees to stay

        if you’re interested:

        https://www.ato.gov.au/businesses-and-organisations/hiring-and-paying-your-workers/fringe-benefits-tax

    • Baron Von J
      link
      317 hours ago

      I’m sure there’s enough companies around who like employees beholden to them on account of granting the privilege of health insurance and the like.

      • TacoButtPlug
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -214 hours ago

        I took “treating work benefits such as employer-provided transportation, free food and on-site gyms as a new source of taxable income” as this will be taxed on the employer side because these things don’t come out of person’s paycheck, directly. The company supplies it as an incentive to work there.

        • nocturneOP
          link
          fedilink
          613 hours ago

          Taxing employees for fringe benefits such as employer-provided transportation, free food and on-site gyms is up for discussion.

          • TacoButtPlug
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 hours ago

            Yea but, again. Fringe benefits are what employers give to the employees. I don’t pay for access to my company gym.

            • nocturneOP
              link
              fedilink
              39 hours ago

              And you would continue to not pay for it, but you would pay taxes on it.

                • nocturneOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  28 hours ago

                  If enacted, workers would likely have to pay income tax on the fair market value of the fringe benefits they are getting from their employer, said Jeff Martin, tax principal at Grant Thornton’s Washington National Tax Office. This would make these benefits less valuable to employees when taxes are factored in.