• Pennomi
    link
    English
    1871 month ago

    Foreign political funding should be banned everywhere by default. It makes no sense to let foreign interests muck about in your domestic policy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      771 month ago

      Even local political funding should be banned. Elections should be funded by the state with each candidate getting the same amount of exposure.

      • Pennomi
        link
        English
        411 month ago

        I’m okay with funding from constituents, with strict caps on amounts. That way people who have lots of public support get more funding, but a wealthy person can’t outspend someone else.

        No funding from corporations, and no anonymous funding.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          191 month ago

          We already have too many narcissistic leaders everywhere because they can be superficially charming and build up loads of useful connections. It makes sense to have a cut-off for who gets funding at all, but they should all get the same amount of exposure.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 month ago

        Andrew Yang has a great term for this:

        Democracy Dollars

        Also his term for UBI:

        Freedom Dividend

        Great naming lol. Like who could hate something called “Freedom Dividend” and “Democracy Dollars” 😅 (Magats would hate it, they hate democracy)

        Other Policies, if you’re interested: https://2020.yang2020.com/policies/?tab=all

        If ranked choice was a thing, I’d probably rank Yang #1, Bernie #2. (Since Yang would probabky never get elected, so I might as well give him the #1 ranking, his ideas are cool)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 month ago

          I used to be interested in the things Andrew Yang had to say back in 2020, especially with regard to UBI, but I’m really put off by him now. His whole schtick is a libertarian technocratic utopian fantasy. The expansion of welfare while simultaneously sucking up to oligarchs is just a way to preserve the capitalist status quo. He wants to breathe new life into the machine that’s exploiting us and destroying the planet.

          His vision for the future is basically just the UN as depicted in The Expanse.

        • @YarHarSuperstar
          link
          English
          111 month ago

          Yeah, good thing no one can abuse the current system by having a lot of money.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 month ago

            Depends on which current system you mean. I’m Canadian, and while it’s not perfect, it’s a pretty good system.

            • @YarHarSuperstar
              link
              English
              21 month ago

              Fair point, I assumed we were talking about US even though that wasn’t strictly specified. I’m not Canadian so you probably know more than I would, but I’m pretty sure Canada has it’s own systemic problems.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                30 days ago

                I assumed we were talking about US

                Well, the article’s about Greenland, but I guess Ameri-centrism is par for the course.

                I’m pretty sure Canada has it’s own systemic problems.

                Sure, but I don’t think our donation rules are big systematic problems. Our rules don’t allow donations from foreign sources or companies, and include pretty reasonable limits for individuals (plus 75% of political donations are refunded next tax year). We have definitely had donation scandals, but they’ve almost exclusively been because people are breaking the rules.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          How? You get a certain amount of funds to be spent on specific regulated activities if you pass a threshold of signatures.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            A non-serious campaign could use those funds to enrich themselves/others even with approved activities. They could pay for staff, buy signs, etc. and all those people & businesses would make money doing legitimate work for a campaign whose only purpose was to employ those people/businesses.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Not if staff and signs were only provided by the government. It no doubt comes with its own set of problems, but given what we’ve seen with open campaign finance, I think those wouldn’t hold a candle to what we have now.

    • @Eatspancakes84
      link
      English
      61 month ago

      I agree in principle, but in practice it’s tricky. You must have courts that are strong enough to throw out election results if foreign interference can be proven. This has recently happened in Romania, but there are also many examples in which these laws were meaningless. The US is the obvious case where the 2016 election result should have been thrown out, but nothing happened. For the Brexit vote I think some pretty meaningless fines were handed out.

      Another question is what should happen with foreign interference that is not financial in nature. For instance, Musk speaking at AFD, or the Meta algorithms pushing political content.

  • @FelixCressOP
    link
    English
    941 month ago

    Both EU and UK should do the same.

    • Atelopus-zeteki
      link
      fedilink
      321 month ago

      It’s not a bad plan in general, really. Maybe the US should look into and rectify issues that may already exist around political funding.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      At least Germany already does it. On the federal level the maximum donation for non-EU citizens/corporations is 1000 Euro, which is why the Bundestag is investigating Musk giving Weidel a platform as if you were to buy that kind of reach you’d pay way more than 1k. It’s generally the parties which get fined for accepting. Donations over 10k must be publicised, over I think 35k immediately. State law is generally similar.

  • @SulaymanF
    link
    English
    251 month ago

    This is the best preventative measure they can do for now. Musk and other actors can dump massive amounts of money into elections to sway them and many of these democracies haven’t been challenged from outside like this before.

  • jackeryjoo
    link
    English
    1930 days ago

    This should be banned everywhere by default.

    Completely fucked the USA, and it’ll do the same anywhere else it’s not explicitly made illegal.

  • goalless_banana
    link
    English
    51 month ago

    I don’t think tanks, missiles and boots on the ground cares too much about elections! Trump is a facist and he’ll use the American empire military and economic force to bend other nations to his will!

    • Flying Squid
      link
      English
      71 month ago

      If he decides to go to war on multiple fronts with no one backing him up, I don’t think it will go well for him.

      • @Breezy
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        There’s always russia and Isreal.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          They’re both a little busy at the moment. I don’t think they have people to send to Greenland and Panama.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      I really do think that a war of bald faced imperial oligarchic aggression would trigger the collapse of the union.

  • @ZILtoid1991
    link
    English
    41 month ago

    They also should block Xitter altogether.

  • @ikidd
    link
    English
    430 days ago

    Foreign and corporate. Anything over $2000 from an entity.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    330 days ago

    Every country should just make the USA illegal. Nothing specific, just the USA in general.

    • @FelixCressOP
      link
      English
      530 days ago

      Pull your tongue out of Putin’s arse.

      Dogs do that.