Why YSK: The term “Genuine Leather” is a marketing term to sell the lowest quality leather possible.

When purchasing a leather product, look for full grain leather or top grain leather instead. These will provide a much higher quality cut of leather that will look and feel much better and last for much longer.

  • @PreMalone
    link
    1091 year ago

    This really is a perfect replacement for reddit, we even have the same reposted fun facts

    • Margot Robbie
      link
      461 year ago

      You can leave reddit, but you can’t leave the redditor on the inside.

      • SoPunny
        link
        41 year ago

        Which is perfect. Love the redditor, hate the Reddit. Isn’t that what the church of “insert clever name here”

    • @washabe
      link
      211 year ago

      I mean, reposting things that were on Reddit before would be a good way to get more content on here

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Reddit does it with Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and Tumblr…

          Some of the bigger communities is literally just screenshots of what people say other places.

          It would be pretty funny to see an instance that just pulls posts from subs and posts them to Lemmy. Not direct links to reddit, just copy the link/pic/video

          • Ben Hur Horse Race
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            fair point… yeah now that you mention it, a lot of the shit I used to see on reddit was from “curated tumbler”, " white people twitter" etc…

            I’m glad I left reddit, the api cluster fuck and associated protests (which I joined w/ my rinky dink tiny sub) came at the perfect time to give me the shove out the door I needed. I was spending 3, 4, 5 hours of my day reading the most inane bullshit.

            I’m at extremely high risk of it happening again with lemmy, but I like to think it’ll never take on the endlessly churning sewer-exit pipe amount of “content” that reddit had with its however many millions of users.

          • Daftman
            link
            11 year ago

            This would be a perfect way to get an easy transition for certain subreddits. I even have a few in mind.

            However what is the risk of getting in trouble for plagiarism, and risking a cease and desist?

    • @hlqxz
      link
      51 year ago

      Hahaha that’s funny as fuck

    • [email protected]
      link
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      next YSK: /c/YouShouldKnow reposts things from /r/youshouldknow

      top comment: /r/youshouldknow is also reposts from /r/youshouldknow reply–> the real YSK is in the comments

  • @derf82
    link
    741 year ago

    Not quite. The truth is, there is no universally recognized grades of leather. But when bragging about quality, genuine leather is the lowest bar they can go (other than bonded leather, which isn’t fully leather but just a veneer over fabric.

    Full grain or top grain is generally what you want.

    https://lifehacker.com/what-genuine-leather-really-means-1850309049

    Also, some are concerned about the use of an animal product. The vast majority of leather is a byproduct of the beef industry. It is skin that would otherwise go to waste. And it is also far more environmentally friendly a material than many alternatives, which are often made of plastics.

    • Margot Robbie
      link
      131 year ago

      Yeah, honestly you should buy leather products based on brands than on description of “genuine” leather.

      And agree, real leather is a much better alternative to the ridiculous amount of micro-plastic synthetic leather generates, especially since it’ll last you decades if you maintain it well.

    • @queermunist
      link
      51 year ago

      It’s the industry recapturing some of its costs by reducing waste. That’s still supporting the industry.

      • @derf82
        link
        English
        281 year ago

        We applauded Native Americans for using every part of the animal, yet when we do it today somehow it’s a bad thing.

        The skins are there rather you like the industry or not. Better to use them than throw them in a landfill.

        • @queermunist
          link
          -151 year ago

          By your logic, why don’t we flay off the skins of all dead people and wear those too? They’re just going to waste!

          I’m opposed to the animal killing industry and all of its various outgrowths. The less money that can be made from it, the less money will be invested into the industry in the first place. If the skins end up in a landfill, that’s lost revenue that makes the industry suffer. Putting money in the pockets of these businesses just lets them reinvest. Stop trying to portray your choice to wear skin as somehow the more ethical one and preach from some imaginary moral high ground.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            20
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Why not indeed! Its a travesty that Im not allowed to make a wallet out of grandpa’s dead ass!

            • @queermunist
              link
              8
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Tan me hide when I’m dead, Fred
              Tan me hide when I’m dead
              So we tanned his hide when he died, Clyde
              And that’s it hangin’ on the shed!
              Altogether now!

              (actually, I unironically think human remains should be reused instead of preserved in a box lol)

              • @wotsit_sandwich
                link
                21 year ago

                Ah Rolf Harris. Haven’t seen him on TV for years. I wonder why.

                A short time later.

                Oh.

          • @imagoodmushroom
            link
            91 year ago

            I’d genuinely prefer if my family turned my remains into a fucking backpack instead of paying thousands of dollars to put them on a cushioned box in the ground

          • why don’t we flay off the skins of all dead people and wear those too?

            Because human skin makes really shitty quality leather. It’s not nearly thick enough.

            Human bodies aren’t even fit for composting, given the amount of pharmaceuticals and forever chemicals most have in their bodies by the time they die.

          • Sancthuary
            link
            41 year ago

            Lemmy really capture og Reddit feeling, even have this kind of redditor

          • debased
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            gotta love all the people throwing shade at you but never showing any actual counterargument. Average carnist behaviour, gotta keep the cognitive dissonance at bay.

            • @queermunist
              link
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Don’t you see? By not draping ourselves in the flesh of dead animals we’re actually being disrespectful of their sacrifices!!! You don’t want animals to end up in landfills, do you?

              Bleh. There’s nothing worse than these preachy types who try to assuage their guilt by presenting their practices as ethical. At least carnists that don’t care about animals are honest with themselves

              • debased
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                agreed. do you know of any active vegan community on lemmy? the only ones i have found seem completely dead or average one post a week

                • @queermunist
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  Nope. I’ve mostly accepted that the only way some communities will ever exist is if someone becomes a dedicated poster and jumps off the cliff every day to keep them active, at least until they can attract their own userbase.

          • Margot Robbie
            link
            21 year ago

            Relax, no need to name-call. Otherwise, I’ll be forced to make a video of me badly singing “Imagine”, and nobody wants to hear that.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                91 year ago

                Hahahahahahahahaha did you just call him a bloodmouth? Are you a fuckin villager in the 1600s fuckin blood mouth

                • @queermunist
                  link
                  -61 year ago

                  That’s what carnists are! They eat things that bleed. Hence, bloodmouth.

                  Corpse sucker is also fun.

  • @SweetSitty
    link
    291 year ago

    You should also know that technically only the piece marked as genuine leather needs to actually be genuine leather. If you buy something made with multiple pieces, the rest could be made from any material so long as that one piece is genuine.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      “Made with natural and artificial flavors”… So just… made with artificial flavors then…

      • @CountZero
        link
        91 year ago

        You know what’s cool about “natural flavors”? They just have to be found in nature to call them that. They can be synthesized in a lab and still be a “natural flavor.”

        P.S. don’t fall for the naturalistic fallacy. This comment is about tricky vocabulary used by the food industry. Whether or not a chemical is found in nature has nothing to do with whether it is good or bad for you. Arsenic is natural.

        • @ShadyGrove
          link
          31 year ago

          Yup! “All Natural” is just a marketing term, there’s no regulations behind it. USDA Organic is a real thing though, farms need to be organic for 7 years to be labeled that, if I recall correctly at least

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Okay so I did debate on whether to use that example, because yeah I’m a skeptic and don’t fall for the naturalistic fallacy. But it just happens to be a good example. Such a silly thing, made of “natural” and/or “unnatural” ingredients covers 100% of things lol.

        • @AdrianTheFrog
          link
          21 year ago

          There is a reason why American cheese is called a “pasteurized prepared cheese product”, using various terms in food is heavily regulated.

  • wvenable
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    If you think about it, it makes sense. All they are saying it’s that is actually real leather which is the least you could say about leather.

    To add to the naming fun: Corinthian Leather.

  • @BigTrout75
    link
    221 year ago

    Can somebody explain why leather is better? It’s it the smell? The feel? Tradition? I see it in car reviews where they complain about cloth.

    • Sentiel
      link
      181 year ago

      It’s breathable but works in both warm and cold weather. This makes it ideal for spring and autumn. It’s easy to clean although it’s also hard to maintain (you have to oil it and protect it against rain). It lasts for very long if you care for it unlike fabric or fake leather, so a leather jacket can be worn for decades and still look and feel great.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Surely leather is skin and skin is very definitely non porous? Secrete oils from tiny glands? Yes. Let water through? Very much nope.

        • Sentiel
          link
          61 year ago

          There’s various types of leather, some of which are actually porous. I’m no expert but you can Google it.

          The point about rain protection isn’t related to the water getting through but because rain can contain chemicals and salt which can stain the leather and also make the leather brittle and vulnerable to mechanical damage, like getting cracks on it because it loses some of it’s natural elasticity.

          This is usually prevented by oiling it and putting various rain protection products on it.

        • @Ddhuud
          link
          21 year ago

          deleted by creator

    • YuzuDrink
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      My best guess (not in the community or anything) is that leather does better at being durable—especially if you treat it well and condition it regularly?—than cloth and plastic-leather alternatives, which break down. I know leather is meant to be very durable and have good “properties,” but I can’t be specific.

      • Deceptichum
        link
        fedilink
        23
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve had a leather belt for about 25 years now that I bought for like $10, wear it multiple times a week. In all those years I’ve gone through multiple other belts that haven’t lasted.

        Far as I see it, leather belts are the most economical and better for the environment than constantly manufacturing lesser lasting belts.

        • @MiddleWeigh
          link
          131 year ago

          It’s been designed by time. Why manufacture something that has been provided? Seems like an unnecessary step, and a large reason for much of our problems. My s.o. works leather as a hobby, and it’s really cool. All the stuff she’s made me is better than anything I’ve had before.

        • @wotsit_sandwich
          link
          81 year ago

          I bought a leather belt in Prague as a nice souvenir. Stil wearing it almost daily over 20 years later. I replaced the stitching but the leather is still rock solid.

    • @kcdaguy
      link
      91 year ago

      It is something people think they want because it is more expensive and in higher trim levels in cars. But when your car is parked in the hot sun the leather feels like it burns and in the winter is freezing to the touch. Leather also doesn’t breath so you end up sweating more and if your are not wearing long pants your leg will stick to the seat. Cloth is so much better functionally. Cloth also lasts longer than the fake leather they put in cars. Cloth won’t peel like the fake leather.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        Any cloth i have seen in cars absorbs my swet, and is hard to clean up afterwards, unlike leather.

    • decadentrebel
      link
      81 year ago

      I like how leather feels like and the unique look when it’s aged or beaten up. Works great with wallets, belts, shoes… but not so much your couch, especially when it’s hot and humid.

    • @w2tpmf
      link
      41 year ago

      Most cars that advertise leather interior aren’t even real leather, they are vinyl.

    • @RedMarsRepublic
      link
      41 year ago

      Mostly people like it because it’s expensive and it makes them feel rich. It is more durable than cloth but that hardly matters for most of the things it’s used for.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        It is very useful for furniture and car seats and things like that. Waterproof and easy to maintain without absorbing too much scents or liquids from your body.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hardly matters? Try having kids and a dog for 5 years with a cloth couch. The permanent stains and smell will be impossible to get out.

        Real leather? Will hold up to everything and go for 10 more years.

        Garbage leather? Will crack and tear the first time your dog gets on it.

        Leather has issues (Ethical issues with how we treat cows. Elitists issues putting leather on every surface of their car whether it needs it or not, etc). But quality leather matters, and does make a difference in durability.

        • @RedMarsRepublic
          link
          31 year ago

          I dunno, we have had a non leather sofa in my family home for like over 5 years and it’s fine. Nothing wrong with it to me.

    • Ronno
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      @BigTrout75 many people are sensitive to dust. A car with a leather interior is easier to clean. The dust cannot stick in the seats.

        • Ronno
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          @okiloki well, yes and no. The air feels cleaner when stepping into a warm car with leather interior, opposed to cloth

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Isn’t house dust mainly skin and leather also skin? Admittedly leather is dead skin that’s not being replaced any more, so perhaps without a process of replacement it also somehow lacks the shedding?

  • @Arete
    link
    191 year ago

    I thought “genuine” was the middle grade, with “bonded” being the lowest. Bob’s Furniture used to market “genuine bonded leather” sofas which I found both clever and infuriating.

    • @BlueDepth9279
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      Bonded leather is less than 20% real leather and made from scraps and fibers of genuine leather combined with binders. It’s generally not as durable as genuine leather.

  • MadWorks
    link
    171 year ago

    It’s like leather veneer, in most cases.

    • @derf82
      link
      41 year ago

      That’s bonded leather.

  • Zorro
    link
    141 year ago

    Well yes but my wallet is cool and on a chain

    • @seeCseasOP
      link
      41 year ago

      is it a genuine metal chain?

  • niktemadur
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    In one of those 70s Fat Albert episodes, I think it was Rudy who one day showed up wearing a jacket of “genuine imitation leather”. That term has stuck with me for decades.

    • @ChickenLadyLovesLife
      link
      61 year ago

      I forget what product this was, but there was a supplement once that bragged about its “genuine placebo effect”.

  • terwn43lp
    link
    101 year ago

    plant based leather exists

      • @mtorpey
        link
        111 year ago

        One for the philosophers.

      • Noxy
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        is soy milk really milk, though?

        nope.

        do I care?

        nope. love the stuff.

        • CrimeDad
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s fine, but if you’re going to advocate for an alternative product, you should believe in it enough not to pretend it’s the thing it’s supposed to replace or that the people you’re trying to convince are too stupid to notice the difference.

        • @average650
          link
          21 year ago

          If you enjoy it great.

          Except for a few specific cases, indo not enjoy them at all… Oat milk is okay if the milk is not a major player in taste. Coconut milk is good if you want a coconutty taste.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Personally I prefer soymilk and almond milk for cereal, but I’ll stick to regular milk products for most sauces/cooking.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I misread that as Coconut milk is good if you want a community taste.

            I was going to ask what community tasted like.

        • Zerlyna
          link
          21 year ago

          Dark chocolate almond milk is my favorite splurge.

    • @Nerdfest
      link
      81 year ago

      The “leather” made from cork is pretty amazing.

      • Quit_this_instance
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Yeah I have a cork-leather wallet, it’s awesome. Lasting better than my prior two supposedly leather ones. Not sure it would work as a belt though, idk

  • c4
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    All I can say is that it’s still at least leather. Most things (e.x., belts) will say “manmade leather” or “manmade materials” and they are fake and break. The genuine leather belt I have has been working for 4 years without snapping.

    • Solo
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Still better to get full grain leather. Guinie leather is to full grain leather as particle board is to solid wood.

      • @FooSolo
        link
        41 year ago

        So genuine leather is made of nutsacks, udders, and assholes pressed together with a veneer piece of taint stretched over it to make it look like full grain leather.

    • @lich_hegemon
      link
      191 year ago

      It has its place.

      For example, leather in second hand products it’s great because it’s durable and often high quality. And, whatever you do, the animal has already been killed and paid for.

      I would also buy leather products if it’s for something that I intend to use for many years. It sort of offsets the environmental damage from buying multiple synthetic products.

      Then again, I’m not vegan.

    • mitchie151
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      In the right context, leather goods are much more durable and sustainable than synthetic alternatives. That said, leather is a co-product of the meat and dairy industry which is currently ridiculously unsustainable. Leather for leathers sake in designer goods and such is ridiculous.

      • NotAPenguin
        link
        fedilink
        -181 year ago

        Leather production is terrible for the environment, a shit ton of chemicals used.

    • Solo
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Agreed. I don’t purchase leather anymore but when I did I still knew genuine leather is pretty much junk.

      • Joe
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        You didn’t need to kill the cow to eat, you chose to kill something that didn’t want to die for the fleeting taste of it’s dead body on your tongue

    • corporateHippie
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Wonder what the people who are downvoting this are thinking. Is it not murder, or is it only a restproduct of murder?

      • @hark
        link
        701 year ago

        I think it’s because it’s irrelevant for someone who would be interested in leather (and this YSK). I’m sure they’re well aware of where leather comes from. I will say, though, that if cows are getting murdered for food, then they might as well use the whole animal instead of letting it go to waste.

          • @hark
            link
            11 year ago

            Perhaps the leather is as/more profitable, but the beef is still being eaten. Kind of misleading to state that Brazil barely exports that beef to the US when there are many other markets that it does export that beef to. It’s a distinction that I’m not sure is significant. As much of the cow is being used with little waste. As long as cows are getting killed for food as a “co-product” it’d still be a waste to throw out the leather (or the other way around).

      • unsophisticated
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        I wonder what people who upvote this are thinking, obviously the point is moot unless you are also vegan. And who upvotes someone going “meat is murder” in the comment section.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          141 year ago

          I’m not vegan, but I do personally agree that it’s selfish and inhumane to eat meat and use leather - especially on an industrial scale. I eat meat, but I don’t have any delusions about where it comes from.

          Not meaning to argue, but just to say it’s not only vegans that think about this stuff. Also, even if it was, that doesn’t mean they’re wrong or moot.

          • TheSaneWriter
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            I think it’s the difference between vegan ethics and being a vegan in practice. I generally agree with vegan ethics, I think that meat and leather are generally made from murder. Perhaps a lesser version of murder than killing a human being, but murder nonetheless. However, animal products are common in both food and consumer goods and I don’t have the time or money to commit towards fully avoiding them. Like with the issue of many of our agricultural goods being the product of slavery, I believe that this is something that should moreso be curtailed by the state than any individual consumer.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              This is my general philosophy. I try to be as ethical as I can, but I realize there will always be a certain level of “hypocrisy” in my actions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        I like to think myself open-minded, but I’m also a meat eater. It really is just a matter of self control and convenience. I know humans eating meat in most developed countries is completely unnecessary. I know farming methods are cruel and environmentally damaging. It’s just tough to shake off the habit of craving a nice chicken breast or steak, especially since I lean towards a very high protein a diet.

        I’d go far enough to say it used to not be murder, but now we only kill animals for luxury.

  • @_MoveSwiftlyM
    link
    81 year ago

    Could you please add a “Why YSK:”? It’s rule #2. Thank you. :)