• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1441 month ago

    Am I being cynical if I wonder if Ticketmaster just cancelled a number of tickets randomly, just so they can resell those at its new “market price.” Normally I would just assume incompetence or a mistake, but this is Ticketmaster.

    • billwashere
      link
      English
      221 month ago

      If there’s a financial incentive for them to do it, then that’s why they did it. Follow the money. There are no ramifications for Ticketmaster to do this sort of abhorrent behavior. They just don’t care.

    • @aeronmelon
      link
      English
      131 month ago

      You are, and you’re probably right.

    • ms.lane
      link
      English
      21 month ago

      Maybe you are, but it’s what I thought too.

  • @nogooduser
    link
    English
    931 month ago

    She initially thought the email was fake, but after realising it was from Ticketmaster she said she does not intend to buy tickets from the company in the future, despite being a loyal customer.

    Loyal customer pretty much means the same as regular concert goer.

    I go to quite a few concerts and all of my tickets are bought from Ticketmaster in some form. I wouldn’t call myself loyal to them as I’m forced to choose between Ticketmaster or no concert.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      I have a season MLS ticket to my local team directly through the team, and everything is controlled and processed through Ticketmaster anyways. Have to log in to ticket Master through a special portal to access anything

    • @ShortFuse
      link
      English
      41 month ago

      Exactly. Is it really loyalty when you only have one option?

      • @P1nkman
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        It sounds better than monopoly. Image is everything.

    • @11111one11111
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      100% right and I don’t doubt the woman from the article feels the same but if you want to add weight to informing a company they fucking suck you use terms like loyal or committed or something similar that adds the red flag to corporate that their actions are affecting their customer retention bottom line.

      Edit: I feel I need to add, “in most cases.” Kinda hard for this to affect companies who are aloud to have monopolies over an industry because it throws customer retention concerns out the window. But I stand by my comment because I still think the verbiage used in the email is just the standard way of addressing corporate ran entities.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    821 month ago

    How can be legal? Bot detection should apply almost immediately, not after six months.

    It smells like “we sold too many tickets, we need a plausible excuse to refund people”

    And there’s a simple trick to stop bots: make tickets non transferable. But that would hurt their secondary sales on that other reselling site operated by themselves, and shows wouldn’t be sold out immediately due to FOMO (if tickets can be resold even at a higher price, people would buy them even if they’re not 100% sure they can attend the show)

    • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
      link
      English
      81 month ago

      make tickets non transferable

      This sounds sensible, but in practice ID checking however many tens of thousands of people on their way into a venue would take forever. (Not to mention now having to deal with the portion of genuine customers who’ve forgotten to bring Id etc)

      • edric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        It would be easier to not allow resales above the original purchase price.

        • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
          link
          English
          51 month ago

          Without ID on the ticket you don’t know it’s been resold. All a venue sees is someone presenting a valid QR code (or whatever)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            Could they just allow the account holder to void the old ticket code and issue a new one? Then you’d have to trust resellers to not yoink your ticket after they walk away with your money.

          • edric
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It doesn’t matter if it’s resold. If tickets can’t be resold with markup prices, scalpers won’t have any incentive to hoard and resell (assuming there are no fees for reselling, in an ideal scenario), therefore reducing the resale market to people who actually have a legit reason to sell their tickets.

            • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
              link
              English
              21 month ago

              Oh I see, you mean ban legit reselling?.. could do. no chance of stopping unofficial reselling though (gumtree whatever). It’s a terms of service thing not a legal thing. So gumtree, eBay etc are not obliged to take down such things. And of course they would never stop touts doing it in person on approaches to a venue…

              • edric
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                Ticketmaster can easily prevent out-of-band reselling by only allowing resales on their site. So anyone selling their tickets on ebay or wherever will still have to transfer the tickets and get paid through ticketmaster, which should only allow you to sell at original purchase price with no extra fees. This would also help prevent scams and fraud because all transactions would be via their system and they already implement that rotating code technology to prevent screenshots from working.

                Of course ticketmaster doesn’t do that because they charge a fee on resales, which gets them more money.

                • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
                  link
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  How could it actually work though? Without checking ID at the gate you have no idea if the ticketholder is the original or has bought from a scalper?

  • @SinningStromgald
    link
    English
    211 month ago

    It should say “bots not approved and distributed by Ticketmaster to scalpers”.

  • dissentiate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 month ago

    Former touring musician here. The larger acts are contractually bound to whatever their label decides on venues and ticketing in most cases. But there’s no reason to roll over and accept these assholes at Ticketmaster as our defacto option to have live music. Support local artists and local venues if possible. I’m out in the fucking sticks, but I will drive an hour to catch a show from time to time.

    • @Evotech
      link
      English
      51 month ago

      Some venues can also only be booked if you use Ticketmaster. So like at. A certain scale it’s impossible for even the labels to avoid it if they wanted.

      • dissentiate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        Good point. I’m an eternal optimist for an artist first movement where parasitic corps fuck right off. One day… one day…

  • Flying Squid
    link
    English
    -321 month ago

    They should be grateful for Ticketmaster sparing them that torture.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 month ago

      Wow, strong take. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t like Oasis, but I’m sure other people listen to them on purpose.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        English
        201 month ago

        I don’t actually mind their music, I just like shitting on Oasis because the Gallaghers are assholes.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            English
            41 month ago

            To be honest, “assholes” fits in either case.

          • skulblaka
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            Hi, it’s me, here to ruin the fun as usual.

            Noel and Liam Gallagher are the Gallaghers in question, and their band has been successfully sued for plagiarism on three different occasions.

            I’m with Squid on this one.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -401 month ago

    It’s definitely just me, but I think every event like this is just for consumers that don’t know any better.

    It’s sad watching fully-grown adults get googly-eyed over things like this, but here we are.

      • AmidFuror
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        111 month ago

        Mom’s basement has all of life’s accoutrements already.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 month ago

      It’s definitely just me, but I think every event like this is just for consumers that don’t know any better.

      You’re against performing arts/live shows and think people who enjoy them are suckers? That truly is a wild take.