• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Wonder if federated youtube would work where people host their own content or join up to get a server as a group. That way the home videos nobody watches would not take up the space while big shots need to get better servers to support the view counts.

    • @Valmond
      link
      311 hours ago

      This is what I advocate for. The caveat, but also the reason it will work (accordig to me) is that it’s not monetised.

      There would thus also not be very many dopamine videos (or ragebait etc), those are made to make money.

      Also, if it isn’t for making money, then the scope is no longer a big problem (you don’t need the “line to go up” and get “more followers”) and distribution becomes much simpler.

      I’ll gladly share a bunch of videos to see how it could function, I have a 0.7Gb up but can easily switch to a 10Gb up.

      Thoughts?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    181 day ago

    Stop!!! You cant watch content unless you hand over your identification papers sir.

    While you are here may i interest you in our other entrances which are further away from where you actually wanted to go and will also stop you from entering without providing identification.

  • @SpaceNoodle
    link
    191 day ago

    You’re right, those videos look like total garbage

        • @ClinicallydepressedpoochieOP
          link
          1
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Ok

          Not an advid watcher so they are just going off what ever link I happen to click any given day.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 day ago

            That’s still a lot.

            1. They know what videos you click (obviously)

            2. They know when you click them

            3. They know how much you watch each of the videos

            4. They know how many times you click on the videos

            5. Depending on the platform/client/browser/search engine implementation, they see what videos are shown to you before you click on them (thumbnail gets fetched, autoplay, pre-loading, etc.)

            6. If someone sent you the link, they most likely know who’s sent you the link (through a reference ID)

            7. The person who’s sent you this is probably logged in, so they know them by name, DoB, interests, etc. From here on out they can guess your own membership of certain statistical cohortsa bit better then through yourown clickinglinks alone.

            And a host of other things - where you’re located (IP address), what type of connection you’re on (IP address + bandwidth), what type of device, what browser/client, etc.

            This is just of the top of my head.

            Don’t mean to scare anyone with this, but it is inherently spooky at the very least.

            • @ClinicallydepressedpoochieOP
              link
              2
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Its not only true of youtube either. I think they call it browser fingerprint? There are websites that can break down what it’s looking for and Ive tried, in an always futile attempt, to mask mine as much as possible but could spend sometime looking into it again.

              Someday I’ll just go straight torr everything I am just admittedly too lazy.

  • Dekkia
    link
    fedilink
    61 day ago

    The most annoying thing for me is that I am logged in and embedded videos are still broken.

    • Kairos
      link
      fedilink
      222 hours ago

      Third party cookies. You don’t want them.

    • @Wild_Mastic
      link
      51 day ago

      For me it does not bypass age verification, even if I enable the toggle on the settings.

    • @reddig33
      link
      10
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      It doesn’t. This is about ad revenue and tracking cookies. Got a VPN? You’re a bot! Got an ad blocker? You’re a bot!