• Dr. Moose
    link
    English
    38 hours ago

    Nokia still exists?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, Eriksson too. Both pretty much abandoned their consumer phone business. They have pivoted to afaik mostly telecommunications infrastructure. But both companies do a bunch of other stuff.

      Nokia and Eriksson were really happy when Huawei started being kicked out of 5G infrastructure.

      • Dr. Moose
        link
        English
        17 hours ago

        That’s not a bad bet. Clearly telecommunications infrastructure is not going away and even radio towers are never going away until physics finds an alternative.

        I do kinda miss Nokia’s creativity tho

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    812 hours ago

    Oh thank god. Was getting sick of only having hella overpriced and slow satellite internet there.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    712 hours ago

    We believe delivering Nokia’s 4G/LTE system to the lunar surface is a transformative moment in the commercialization of space and the maturity of the lunar economy.

    … I fucking hate capitalism.

  • funkajunk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 day ago

    I know it kind of sounds silly, but this is some of the very first infrastructure on The Moon, and that’s pretty cool.

    The Moon will likely be our main port for travel within our solar system - if we made a lunar space elevator we would use it as our launch point without having to expend so much fuel launching from Earth like we do with traditional rockets.

    • Dr. Moose
      link
      English
      18 hours ago

      People really not feeling this in the current climate for sure

    • @Cocodapuf
      link
      English
      615 hours ago

      The moon rotates too slowly (about once every 30 days), you don’t want a space elevator for the moon, the tether would have to be ridiculously long.

      But there’s no atmosphere, so you have another good option: a linear accelerator, or mass driver. Basically you make a very long, very straight rail and use magnetism to accelerate a craft right up to orbital velocity. The only complicated part is constructing 50 km of rail, but I mean, it’s more time consuming than complicated. This is actually way more feasible than a space elevator.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 hours ago

        Wut? Impracticality aside, could they build such a “ridiculously long tether”? What’s they make it of? Musk farts? Can’t wait for him to bankrupt the u.s. and build a space elevator that breaks and shatters, ruining astronomy and prospects of drone explorations of Mars

    • @felbane
      link
      English
      21 day ago

      …but you have to get whatever it is you’re transporting to the moon first

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        We build the thing on the moon itself

        Sure, it’s mostly barren rock, but it still got useful stuff there, like for example water (hydrogen and oxygen, rocket fuel), carbon and oxygen in the rocks (methane, also rocket fuel), metals (building rockets), and various other elements

        From what I’ve read we know, it’s relatively poor in nitrogen and carbon, so the moon is not as useful as it could have been, but water is really all you need. If you can produce fuel and rocket parts on the moon, it’s about as useful as it can be for space exploration and development

        Since, remember, the alternative is getting those resources either from the surface of the earth (expensive in terms of fuel, and requires powerful rockets, aka bigger ships, also expensive), or from some place further out like the asteroid belt (time consuming). Gravity on the moon is much much smaller, so even if we don’t have a space elevator, it would be far cheaper to use the moon as a starting point, or at least as a refueling point

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_resources?wprov=sfla1

      • Billiam
        link
        English
        619 hours ago

        As the saying goes, “orbit is halfway to anywhere.”

        Getting into and out of gravity wells takes far more fuel than moving between planetary bodies. A space elevator that can take cargo from lunar orbit to the surface and back removes one difficulty, while being slightly less sci-fi-ish than a terrestrial elevator.

      • Semperverus
        link
        English
        41 day ago

        They addressed that in their post already.

  • Lantern
    link
    English
    351 day ago

    We believe delivering Nokia’s 4G/LTE system to the lunar surface is a transformative moment in the commercialization of space

    Absolutely love the lack of regulation for space. Going to love seeing the Google tm Moon in 50 years.

    • @x00z
      link
      English
      515 hours ago

      Yeah these companies think just because they can they should.

      Fuck 'em. The moon is part of the view from my garden.

      I’ll fight for that.

          • @Cocodapuf
            link
            English
            315 hours ago

            I’d do that… give me a letter of mark, a capsule and some inertial impactors, I’m ready to go.

  • Riskable
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 day ago

    I dunno. What kind of service can you get with LowG™?