yea!!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    322 hours ago

    Mandrake and Win4Lin, was an amazing time. Back when corporate had you running windows 98se, and you could run it in Mandrake Linux sooo much faster than native. Miss that.

  • @flubba86
    link
    942 days ago

    Mandriva is the new kid on the block. Real classic Linux users will remember Mandrake.

      • @flubba86
        link
        4
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I first tried a version of red hat that I got from a CD on the cover of a PC magazine back in 1999. I was barely a teenager, didn’t know what I was doing, ended up hating it. Then a couple years later I read about Mandrake, again got it from a CD on the front of a magazine. I used it for about a year before hopping to Slackware.

        • k_rol
          link
          fedilink
          11 day ago

          My love hate relationship started with that cd. My dad hated it though because I was screwing up the boot every time.

      • JAdsel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        Same here. I started out on Debian Woody, then decided to try a side install of Mandrake specifically because it was supposed to be the most user-friendly option. I do recall liking the Mandrake experience well enough at the time–but stayed primarily using Debian, because I’m stubborn and rather enjoyed the sense of challenge.

        (Also kinda setting the continuing pattern of keeping at least one side distro or OS going to try out. These days, they are more likely to live in VMs though.)

      • @nothingcorporate
        link
        32 days ago

        My first around the same time, I couldn’t believe something like that was free. Now I’m on Bazzite and I still can’t believe it.

    • f00f/eris
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 days ago

      I’m not a classic Linuxer (I switched in 2015) but I did once try Mandrake out of historical curiosity. From what I hear it was the recommended “beginner-friendly” distro before Ubuntu came out. And based on how hard it was to get working on a VM, I now understand why classic Linuxers talk about Ubuntu like it was this huge sea change.

      • Max-P
        link
        fedilink
        62 days ago

        It ran fairly well for me out of the box. I think it’s similar to trying to run Windows 98/2000/XP on modern VM software, it gets utterly confused and needs very specific hardware configuration to boot. Modern VMs run this good in big part because of paravirtualized hardware.

        I think what made Ubuntu so good is a combination of being based on Debian and also being there at the right time when Linux software was getting generally better. When I tried Mandrake it was too early for Wine to run any sort of game, codecs were lacking for video. When I tried Linux again with Ubuntu, there was now VirtualBox and computers fast enough to run that reasonably, graphics drivers were more usable. Compiz was popping off to show off that Xorg could now do compositing like macOS and Vista.

        Mandrake was good but limited by what Linux could do back then. Enjoyed it quite a bit but 9 year old me ran back to XP for the games. When I tried Ubuntu I was a bit older and more interested in programming and WoW ran great in Wine, so I managed to stick and have been on Linux since.

    • Max-P
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      My very first distro I believe was Mandrake 10, it’s the distro that planted the seed to eventually switch for real with Ubuntu 7.10

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 days ago

      … And conectiva.

      And they may know how conectiva died, and have sworn off SuSE because of it.

    • @brap
      link
      32 days ago

      Damn, I didn’t realise I still had that memory until now!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Huh, my first Linux distro was the very same distro and version that the original release of Linux-Mandrake was based on (Red Hat Linux 5.1)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 days ago

      I recall trying Mandrake at some point, but I don’t remember when. I might have had it installed on a laptop.

    • Jeena
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 days ago

      Aah, tho med brain didn’t lie to me, good to know!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 days ago

      Mandrake was the first distro I was looking for in a small city, in the third world in the 90s. Couldn’t put my hands on those CDs, not even in the one university with some sort of computational engineering career there. I first installed Slackware.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 days ago

    Bah. Make it a challenge.

    Turbo. Conectiva. Stampede. Corel. Open.

    And the painfully ironically-named UnitedLinux. Go get the inside scoop on that gangwar.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 days ago

      Man, Corel Linux looks like a vibe. The box looks familiar but don’t think I ever used it.

      • seyon
        link
        fedilink
        31 day ago

        @dx1 @corsicanguppy Corel was the revolution we need on the Desktop distros. It was the first distro with a graphical installation (and an easy one). Corel just didn’t have the luck they needed, because it was released with KDE 1 with the corresponding qt libraries. KDE 2 was released just a year or less after the Corel Linux be released.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 hours ago

          Corel was beautiful. It was, like gWave, ahead of its time.

          And, being from Corel, it wasn’t only beautiful, but also tainted by PTSD from using CorelDRAW, which was so bad that the user needed to reboot after/while using it to reclaim leaked RAM.

  • Aatube
    link
    fedilink
    82 days ago

    In February 2004, MandrakeSoft lost a court case against Hearst Corporation, owners of King Features Syndicate. Hearst contended that MandrakeSoft infringed upon King Features’ trademarked character Mandrake the Magician. As a precaution, MandrakeSoft renamed its products by removing the space between the brand name and the product name and changing the first letter of the product name to lower case, thus creating one word. Starting from version 10.0, Mandrake Linux became known as mandrakelinux, and its logo changed accordingly. Similarly, MandrakeMove (a Live CD version) became Mandrakemove.

    In April 2005, Mandrakesoft announced the corporate acquisition of Conectiva, a Brazilian-based company that produced a Linux distribution for Portuguese-speaking (Brazil) and Spanish-speaking Latin America. As a result of this acquisition and the legal dispute with Hearst Corporation, Mandrakesoft announced that the company was changing its name to Mandriva, and that their Linux distribution Mandrake Linux would henceforward be known as Mandriva Linux.

  • @TwanHE
    link
    11 day ago

    Damn I don’t remember using it personally but i think my dad had an install cd with this logo on it.

  • qkalligula
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    @adrianhooves This unlocked a core memory in me … And I hated it. Old kde (I think 3) couldn’t run on my potato…and I wasn’t versed enough then to change that.

    Edit - landed on pclinuxos for a bit

  • @badbytes
    link
    22 days ago

    Had a good but short run.