• Dragon Rider (drag)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    110 minutes ago

    Drag thought Brother were supposed to be the makers of user friendly printers. Are they enshittifying?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 minutes ago

    This shit happened to me recently. Installed firmware update and immediately my 3rd party toner stops working. Try to find old firmware to roll back to and couldn’t locate it anywhere. Found some for other models via Google drive links in Reddit posts, but nothing for my printer.

    I replaced the toner with new 3rd party toner which worked. And now I’ll never install another firmware update on the printer and should probably block it from the internet.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 hours ago

    I fear the day my 2014 hp LaserJet dies. There won’t be a decent printer on the market…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 hours ago

        I’ve have had this thought too and the only reason I can think of is that the inkjet printers are sold at such a rediculous loss, that anything that could be sold next to them without the offset price from ink would seem like a bad joke.

        • @ripcord
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          49 minutes ago

          I think they meant - movement to release custom firmware for existing printers.

  • Obinice
    link
    English
    996 hours ago

    You were the chosen one! 😭

  • @SoftestSapphic
    link
    English
    265 hours ago

    nononononononpnNONONONONONO WHYYYYY I JUST GOT A BROTHER BECAUSE OF HP DOING THE SAME THING WTF

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 hours ago

    Haha, my crappy ass old HP printer still takes refills. No printer company shall ever see another cent of mine 😈

  • DFX4509B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    105 hours ago

    It’s going to get to the point where you might be better off going back to dot matrix if tank-based inkjet printers are somehow locked down via chemical DRM too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    This is a total shit move but I have tried many printers and I’m still choosing Brother everytime. Especially on some older generations with copy scan and print. None of the other big brands are worth a shit. They all fail or jam in some form or fashion.

    • @some_designer_dude
      link
      English
      255 hours ago

      Give them time and they’ll suck too. Nothing is safe from enshitification, as they’ve just shown us.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      187 hours ago

      Right? I used to recommend friends and family invest in a brother laser printer instead of inkjet, especially if they didn’t need color

  • @Limonene
    link
    English
    1289 hours ago

    In case anyone was thinking this applies only to inkjet printers: no, it ONLY seems to apply to laser printers – the thing that Brother used to be known for. Where the article says “ink”, they mean “toner”. There is no ink in a laser printer.

      • @shalafi
        link
        English
        148 hours ago

        I believe that only applies to ink jet. You can hardly make secret dots in B&W.

        • @Treczoks
          link
          English
          98 hours ago

          There is something similar for B&W laser printing. Text is never 100% black, but rastered. You can digitally hide a whole lot of information in microraster on a page of printed text.

          • @idiomaddict
            link
            English
            15 hours ago

            Text is never 100% black, but rastered.

            Does “rastered” mean the image is mapped onto a very fine grid and each square is given a 0-100 value for intensity of ink? I looked it up, and it seemed like the squares are given a binary value, but this is nowhere near my wheelhouse and I’m honestly not sure I understood the Wikipedia page, let alone the references

            • @Treczoks
              link
              English
              74 hours ago

              It is actually quite easy: “Black” print does not mean that 100% of all pixels are actually set. Print pixels are never perfect squares, so even if the printer only prints half of the dots, the print is still dark enough. If not, it could print 70% or 80%, but lets stick to 50% for ease of argument.

              So instead of

              XXXXXXXX
              XXXXXXXX
              XXXXXXXX
              

              it would print

              X X X X
               X X X X
              X X X X
              

              For you, it would still be a “roughly black” spot (keep in mind these 8x3 pixel are 0.032mm wide and 0.012mm high on good laser printer).

              Would you notice if the pattern was slightly different, like

              X X X X
               X XX  X
              X X X X
              

              Make a bonanza of those small changes nobody can see, and you can hide thosands of bytes of data in those patterns on any printed page.

  • @werefreeatlast
    link
    English
    35 hours ago

    I’m actually looking for a good multifunctional printer. Our Samsung is dying. It was an LED printer and we only changed toner 1 time in 15 years.