During a recent interview, the actress also explains why she doesn’t consider herself a movie star.

  • scytale
    link
    English
    282 years ago

    While sequels to closed stories are usually terrible, they can actually pull off a prequel with her character getting the omega’s power, before Cage came into the picture.

    • @smokin_shinobi
      link
      English
      112 years ago

      The first movie wasn’t all of the comic, there’s more story left.

      • @quams69
        link
        English
        22 years ago

        It’s a short novel, and the movie wasn’t any of it

        Highly recommend the book, it’s incredible

        • @smokin_shinobi
          link
          English
          22 years ago

          It’s also a manga I guess? I definitely read it in panel format and he carried a huge axe. The ending is the best part is why I even bothered to comment.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Correct

            Light novel first, then manga, then the Hollywood adaptation

            The manga has the additional story

    • theinspectorst
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      I can see the narrative opportunity for that, but I think doing a 2nd movie that doesn’t include both the stars would feel like a missed opportunity.

      • yesdogishere
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        i think it would be nice if they had a baby and the baby turned out to be infested with an alien pathogen, and it ate everything up, and left some nice sauce to french chefs to enjoy.

  • @tungah
    link
    English
    142 years ago

    This movie definitely doesn’t need a sequel. How about these hacks be creative and present us with new stories in the media format, just like they did with, I don’t know, the first adaptation?

    They have the talent, they have the money. Just be creative and risk a little.

    That’s the only reason we’re talking about this movie in the first place. They took the risk, and imo, it paid off. I understand it maybe didn’t do so well in the box office aspect, but look at the cult following this movie has.

    Just leave this movie alone. Let’s have new cool stories, please!

    • @kmkz_ninja
      link
      English
      62 years ago

      I don’t think Edge of Tomorrow is where we need to start complaining about sequels. Edge of tomorrow, with Cruise and Blunt, was really unique and fun, and I’d like to see more.

      • @tungah
        link
        English
        32 years ago

        I wholeheartedly agree with your point on the actors. Would be really interesting seeing them together in other contexts/stories, though.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    142 years ago

    Why does everything need a sequel? That movie was great all on its own, one of the few standalone sci fi movies made in recent years. Why do we need another? Is advertising a new movie that expensive that the marketing team needs to ride some else’s coattails to get results?

      • LEX
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -22 years ago

        Cough cough The Mummy cough

        • uphillbothways
          link
          fedilink
          -92 years ago

          I thought it had been largely agreed upon that Mr. scientology middle-tooth jump-on-Oprah’s-couch serial-abusive-husband ruins everything he touches. I’ve actively avoided movies he had any involvement with for like two decades now, so I don’t have any knowledge of more recent work… Legend (1985) was pretty good, but Ridley Scot, Tim Curry and Mia Sara carried that film.

            • decadentrebel
              link
              English
              22 years ago

              Even his “smaller” projects were good - Jack Reacher, American Made, heck Oblivion was decent despite getting mixed reviews and not a huge moneymaker by Cruise standards.

            • uphillbothways
              link
              fedilink
              -5
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              The way in which and how heavily they were marketed turned me off of every one of them before they hit screens. Honestly, I’ve never seen a fast and furious film for the same reason. The harder someone tries to sell something, the more I have to wonder why the product can’t stand on its own.

              • @Delphia
                link
                English
                32 years ago

                I love people who have never seen the F&F movies. Because it starts off as good flashy dumb action that ABSOLUTELY MUST go bigger than last time.

                I’m a car guy, I loved them so much. But even I reached a point where I was like “This shit is so fucking dumb” and stopped watching.

                I find it interesting as to when people felt the need to tap out.

                • uphillbothways
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Nah. Not yet. Don’t know if I will eventually. Definitely not in any hurry to.

          • @Delphia
            link
            English
            22 years ago

            Id argue the opposite… kinda.

            Its the fact that he makes really excellent movies is the only reason I watch them despite me being very against Scientology. Edge of Tomorrow is one of the best scifi movies of recent times.

  • @0933
    link
    English
    72 years ago

    Bill Paxton isn’t.

      • @0933
        link
        English
        22 years ago

        And for the record I freaking loved Bill Paxton, in this movie and about all of his work.

    • decadentrebel
      link
      English
      22 years ago

      Damn, he ain’t gonna be in Edge of Tomorrow 3!

  • @quams69
    link
    English
    22 years ago

    How about an actual adaptation of All You Need Is Kill instead