• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1941 year ago

    Man, this is depressing. While I wasn’t “raised online” since I was raised on dialup and couldn’t block the phone line all that long.

    I still remember when google was the new kid on the block and the general feeling about them across early Internet forums.

    Microsoft was evil because they copied everybody else’s stuff and wanted to charge for it. Apple was clueless making expensive junk. Sun was a darling for a while at least until they started pulling shit.

    Enter mother-fucking-Google. Ethical. Honest. Not evil. Smart. Supporting open source. And on top of all that, FREE to use. Like Microsoft wants to charge you for hotmail if you want an inbox > 2MB? Fucking EVIL!!! Google is ethical because they are completely free!!! And I hear they are working on an email service too. Google just wants to shepherd the internet and protect it from companies like Microsoft, Apple, and AOL.

    Oh Google.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      851 year ago

      A company that survives long enough eventually gets turned to the dark $ide. Greedy asshats will always ruin a good thing for their own benefit

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        78
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Any company that becomes publicly traded gets turned to the dark side. That’s the factor that does it because they have a legal requirement to do everything they can to maximize profits.

        Trying to sustain perpetual growth will always lead to companies fucking over their customers and employees.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          191 year ago

          While I feel this is true there are so few privately owned companies that prove this as fact. Holds breath that steam never fucks over its customers

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I live Valve, but there’s always that nagging bit in the back of my mind reminding me that they can always turn evil in the span of a few years. And the recent debacle with Dolphin doesn’t help

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                No, Dolphin was their fault. Valve reached out to Nintendo before Dolphin was added to the store. If Valve hadn’t asked Nintendo for permission first, Nintendo probably would have said nothing

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  41 year ago

                  Nintendo is required by law to do something or else they run the risk of losing their trademarks.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  It makes sense though. People can already install Dolphin wherever they want, including the Steam Deck. But Valve probably thinks they can get Nintendo to publish on Steam. It wasn’t so long ago that Sony and Microsoft maintained exclusivility on their platforms. Valve doesn’t win anything allowing Dolphin on Steam, but it can potentially anger Nintendo.

            • Nils
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Nintendo sent them a DMCA takedown request for the Dolphin Steam page. So I don’t think we can blame Steam for wanting to stay out of legal trouble

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                4
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No. That is not at all what happened. No DMCA takedown notice was ever sent in this.

                What happened is that Dolphin applied to go on Steam and announced that. Then Valve emailed Nintendo asking for permission. Nintendo said they didn’t want it on the store, pointed to parts of the DMCA which were not actually valid for a theoretical case, and Valve blocked Dolphin from going on Steam

                • Nils
                  link
                  fedilink
                  41 year ago

                  You’re right.

                  Sorry, I just heard somewhere Nintendo sent a DMCA notice and assumed it was right because that seems like a Nintendo thing to do.

            • NormalC
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Valve is already evil: they locked down their steam client (unacceptable in the times of GOG, and Epic Games) and allow developers to put DRM in their games. Outside of that they were the pioneers of digital gambling with CS:GO and TF2 and using anti-features as a way to entice people to purchase micro-transactions.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          There is also the B Corp designation (short for Public Benefit Corporation) which allows a company to balance its responsibility towards the share holders with some other benefit it aims to provide where the share holders aren’t the (only) beneficiaries.

        • @Fried_out_Kombi
          link
          English
          51 year ago

          It’s why I think worker-owned coops should be more common. Research shows that they’re a more resilient business model than hierarchical businesses. I think it’s because they can largely avoid the principle-agent problem, wherein executives and investors act on behalf of the company, but their personal incentives do not necessarily align with the company’s. For example, a CEO has a vested interest in pumping up profitability in the short term, even if it’s by slashing R&D funding and alienating customers long-term, so they can get nice numbers to pad their resumé. Likewise, investors just want their investment back.

          With a coop, overall control of the company’s decisions is guided more by the long-term health of the company, as that’s what is best for the workers. It aligns incentives, avoiding the perverse incentives that cause hierarchical businesses to make unsustainable, short-term business decisions.

      • @captainlezbian
        link
        101 year ago

        Being good is good for growth, but investors eventually want that payout.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          Google also had, realistically, no competition in the online ads business for most of that time. Microsoft tried so hard but never broke into that market. No other online ad company could even come close to google 2000-2010 in terms of scale, technical chops, etc.

          It’s easy to have principals, it’s hard to live up to them. The first real competitor to Google’s online ads dominance was Facebook and has caused Google to completely shit the bed (from practices and policy, they’re obviously doing well money wise)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      Google was so exciting. Gmail especially.

      We were so keen to ditch yahoo messenger and msn as soon as facebook messenger came out too.

      Now it all sucks.

    • @GardenVarietyAnxiety
      link
      251 year ago

      This made me really nostalgic for times when the internet still felt new and promising…

      • Aielman15
        link
        151 year ago

        I miss the old days, browsing internet forums and discovering for the first time that there exist people out there who like the same nerdy things that I do!

    • Dekthro
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      since I was raised on dialup and couldn’t block the phone line all that long.

      That bit reminded me that my mom had a desktop application that takes messages for you when we were using the dial up.

    • @Zekas
      link
      11 year ago

      Sadly even with furry porn, still a product. They forced everyone to be in some art AI dataset, it’s quite the downfall

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
    link
    fedilink
    581 year ago

    All of this led to me ditching all of those (except YouTube, this is without a real alternative due to the content exclusively hosted there) and starting to self-host my stuff and joining the Fediverse.

    • Fest
      link
      191 year ago

      you can use invidious or piped on PC and newpipe on a phone. just be careful cause i heard google removed newpipe from the playstore and someone put something malicious with the same name, but im not sure how that situation is going

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        I use the NewPipe fork with Sponsorblock as an optional feature. You can get NewPipe on F-Droid here and the fork with Sponsorblock here.

        As a rule of thumb, I always check their respective GitHub pages for links, I don’t really trust the Google Store. There are too many spam duplicates of various apps, especially FOSS ones.

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          As far as I’m aware: No login capability, does not require Play Services, supports a few other sites like SoundCloud.

          Both don’t show YT ads.

          For NewPipe there’s a fork that includes SponsorBlock and Return YouTube Dislike (both of which are in Revanced IIRC?)

    • J Lou
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To have some sort of viable fediverse alternative to YouTube, the developers of it would have to abandon some of the free software principles that current fediverse platforms uphold. There needs to be a way to monetize to attract creators and get people to host the servers

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        If it were possible, I’d like to continually donate a given sum of money to an account that split the proceeds between the content creators and the people hosting. Granted, while I’m unemployed, the best I can do currently would be to donate hosting directly

  • The Giant Korean
    link
    English
    571 year ago

    Lemmy seems to be trying its best to teach me about furry porn.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      While I’m not into furry porn, I love the community around it. I’ve actually had random encounters with a few furies and they are awesome peeps.

      • TimeSquirrel
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You know, you can be into furry stuff without being into all the porn…they ARE separable. It’s not any more harmful than anime fans or trekkies, really. There’s tons of crossover, actually.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          They even helped develop the COVID vaccines.

          Furries need high paying jobs to be able to afford all those commissions and fursuits, after all.

    • @derpysmilingcat
      link
      151 year ago

      Listen I didn’t choose the life, the life chose me.

    • DarkMatterStyx
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I feel the same. To each their own, I just don’t get it, but, I’m glad those that do have a place to be themselves!

    • TimeSquirrel
      link
      fedilink
      34
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah but…ordinary people were not dialing into BBS forums back then. We weren’t “raised” online like kids now are, we were able to log off anytime and not ever need it to function in society. That started changing in the early 2000s. All my kid’s school assignments are now done on a laptop on a district-owned cloud system. He hasn’t needed a pencil and paper in…I forgot how long.

      If you’re around my age, congratulations on being the last generation to ever know what the world was like before widespread use of the Internet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        If you’re around my age, congratulations on being the last generation to ever know what the world was like before widespread use of the Internet.

        This is why I always insist that the cutoff between millenial and Gen Z is 1995. There’s a pretty obvious generational split along this topic and 1995 seems to be the birth year of the divide

      • Someology
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Most districts don’t own a cloud system. They subscribe to one from a big vendor, and that vendor is scraping that sweet sweet data (aggregated and anonymity of course, because, kids), but still.

    • @Vigge93
      link
      71 year ago

      I think it’s fair to say that those in their late teens now are the first generation raised online. Sure, previous generations where raised alongside the internet, but the current generation is raised with a much larger presence of the internet.

      • Jon Von Basslake
        link
        111 year ago

        Nah, the zoomers are IMO the second generation to grow up with the internet. Sure it’s even more present for them and gen alpha, but I’d argue us millennials are the ones who first really grew up with the net. While we weren’t on the net all the time back then, we were the generation that grew up with the net as it became what it is today, for better or for worse.

        • @captainlezbian
          link
          101 year ago

          Yeah I’m 28 and was consuming memes in middle school. I was not aware at any point where the default solution to a question was anything other than to look it up on the internet when you get home. I quit Facebook in high school.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          But it certainly wasn’t the internet listed there at least not until the very tail-end of “growing up”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            I say I grew up online. I was a gamer/geek, and there was a massive gaming social presence online in the 90s.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              But not a massive social media presence, not a massive streaming presence, little to no influencers. We didn’t grow up online like kids today, even if we played some Runescape on dial-up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        It is just mindless pursuit of the forbidden for algorithm cheering reasons. And then you need to have had hot sisters to lust after growing up. With so many one children families you end up with a relatively small proportion of the population that could even care.

        On the other hand, adding one incest adjacent keywords to the title, if it means 3% more clicks they’ll do it

        • @victron
          link
          3
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Those click could be superstition about algorithm. I often click on them, it’s not because the word “step” but the word is there anyway. Porn sites aren’t sophisticated enough by and large to do proper a/b testing and find out if the word step make want difference. Especially when the actual content doesn’t even play with the incest concept itself.

            • @victron
              link
              1
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                I don’t know, for me it feels chasing the forbidden for forbiddenness’ sake. The biggest clue to that is how the actual content does really do anything with what the title promises. It doesn’t change what’s on screen

    • @Beliriel
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      Not “could”, you very likely are or have been porn to somebody. Like really very likely. Chances are just that they will never tell you and you will never find out.

    • @PRUSSIA_x86
      link
      251 year ago

      Cringe. The original version is cringe.

      • @SuddenDownpour
        link
        English
        271 year ago

        Youtube taught you to be yourself? The site where basically everyone fakes a striking and cheerful personality because of how difficult it is to build an audience if you don’t?

        • @oryx
          link
          English
          171 year ago

          To be fair, old YouTube wasn’t always like this, and the picture has all old logos in it.

          • Anarch157a
            link
            111 year ago

            It’s clear the original was made before all those sites enshittified into their current forms. That’s why it mentions Vine instead of TikTok, which is notable for having been enshittified from day 1.

      • @orphiebaby
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Huh, I say “gotchu fam” too. Anyway, thanks! And yeah, that’s cringe.

      • @TheControlled
        link
        51 year ago

        Good fucking god. Whatever moron created this… I hope they are as happy as they are stupid.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Thank you. I’ll save it in case I ever have to induce vomiting with that HailCorporate nonsense…

  • Crozekiel
    link
    fedilink
    321 year ago

    One of these things is not like the other…

    DeviantArt really caught me off guard… lol

  • Roundcat
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Vine taught me you’re worthless unless you’re making someone else money.

  • @Mr_Dr_Oink
    link
    181 year ago

    Which generation? Im 36 and i was definitely raised online.

  • @ArmokGoB
    link
    English
    141 year ago

    One of these things is not like the others.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              We recently had trouble with the voicemail on a phone, and when we were talking to apple support over the phone, they mentioned that our phone had recently overheated but that wouldn’t have caused the problem. It was in the sun on our dashboard for a few minutes a week or 2 before.

              I wonder if that type of data could also be going into your interest rates if you apply for an Apple Card. Same with battery levels and drop events. I know that Chinese loan apps mine that data when approving loans, but don’t know if apple would use that data.