Modlog: https://feddit.org/modlog/242334

Tl,dr: got a 3 day banned for pointing new joiners to [email protected] , a more active version of [email protected]

Context

[email protected] was established to promote European products and services. It got popular recently due to the US decision of potentially dropping support to Ukraine. It had a diverse team of moderators, and was getting some activity.

A feddit.org user (potentially unaware of the existence of the first community) decided to create [email protected]

They deleted their Lemmy account after, but promoted a new moderator before leaving.

This moderator created a post to vote about keeping the feddit.org community, or consolidating with the feddit.uk one: https://feddit.org/post/8679890

That vote itself is kind of debatable, as the only option to vote for the consolidation was to downvote, which is not enabled on instances like Blahaj or Reddthat. Also people tend to upvote more than downvote, so the votes expressed may not reflect the actual opinion of the community, but anyway.

Usually, I don’t really care that much about consolidation, there has been a lot of parallel communities for a while, like

It’s not that big of a deal usually, but this case is a big different due to the BuyFromEU movement.

BuyfromEU movement and Lemmy new joiners

https://old.reddit.com/r/BuyFromEU/ is getting quite large recently, even getting some press coverage. There are a few posts promoting Lemmy over there, with more or less success.

What happens then is that people join Lemmy, just look for “buyfromeu” and find the feddit.org community, while the feddit.uk is actually much more active. Some stats:

feddit.org:

  • 1.04K users / day
  • 2.34K users / week
  • 3.02K users / month
  • 3.02K users / 6 months
  • 1.9K subscribers
  • 125 Posts
  • 1.34K Comments

feddit.uk:

  • 3.79K users / day
  • 8.11K users / week
  • 8.86K users / month
  • 8.92K users / 6 months
  • 2.7K subscribers
  • 354 Posts
  • 5.58K Comments

The main issue with this is that as the usually is kind of active, they think that the feddit.org community is the main community on the topic, while the feddit.uk is much more active. So I started to check for new joiners account, and if they hadn’t posted or commented on the feddit.uk community, I would point them to it, with comments like

Welcome here!

A few pointers for you:

The sidebar also lists a few complementary communities to this one, such as [email protected] or [email protected]

Apparently this seems enough to give a temporary ban. The mod team is also quite expressive about the “consolidation cannot be discussed stance” https://feddit.org/post/8905532

Just to add some more context, those are the type of comments I give to every new joiners. Some recent examples

Now, a last section about why I’m personally in favor of consolidating.

Federation and decentralization is about spreading power and responsibilities, not splitting a small user base between different places

Some people argue that consolidating communities goes against the spirit of federation and decentralization. However, for people posting content, there is a consensus that our small user base can only sustain so many communities. Splintering the discussion between places is detrimental to the whole platform. Example of recent consolidations:

In the buyfromEU / buyEuropean case, we see people asking recommendations on the same topics on the two communities, while they might have seen a post from the other one is there was only one: https://feddit.org/post/8925080/5204057

Note that there are cases when new communities need to emerge due to power tripping mods. But here, the feddit.uk mods and admins have been good, no such issue to be reported.

Also, quite a few communities are “the main ones”, without any parallel community

Choice overload and decision fatigue are a thing

Too many options hurts users’ decision-making ability. How they feel about the experience as a whole can be significantly impacted as a result.

https://lawsofux.com/choice-overload/

Isn’t one for European Union and the other for the whole Europe?

The text what to expect says, that we are focusing on the EU, but if other befriended countries slip through we are not enforcing rules. We called it a soft limit, so pepole tend to limit themselves, rather than mods jumping each post.

https://feddit.org/comment/5211878

Due to the inherited name, buyFromEU we would like to soft limit the discussion to the European Union countries. We are tempted to read this as EU + friendly countries as long as this is within reason.

https://feddit.org/post/8545702

Wouldn’t consolidating lose people?

An example of successful consolidation/migration: https://lemmy.world/c/football

Shouldn’t people see the other community from the sidebar?

Sidebars aren’t usually visible on a lot of apps, on Voyager for instance people have to actively look for it:

https://vger.app/search/lemm.ee/c/[email protected]

Why is this case different from other parallel communities?

Due to the growth of the /r/BuyFromEU sub (now at 148000 subscribers), some posts promoting Lemmy are appearing every few days: https://old.reddit.com/r/BuyFromEU/comments/1j7vkrg/the_european_hosted_reddit_alternative_lemmee_is/

As you can see, the main comment is about community split across instances. The commenter was incorrect about the working of federation, but us being unable to provide one community for the discussions to happen isn’t putting Lemmy in a good light as a viable Reddit alternative.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Hi, the critizied, accused and power-tripping mod here.

    Not adding something to the debatable merging discussion, which sure can be a talked about and is even talked bout at other places, and now here again.

    The perspective missing is, that a team of mods, even of other communities talked about the course of action. Reason is, that I’m quite new to moderation, and I did not want to overreact. People native to the instance decided to stick with the community, and the debatable vote added weight to that sentiment. One guy brought the topic up over and over again and tried to position an alternative community instead of adding content to both communities.

    Other mods recommended to ban him for a week or for good. I decided to engage in communication and asked to postpone discussing that issue in that particular community. Also I asked to stop gurilla advertising another commiunithy while that community was in a built up phase.

    After futile mitigation attempts a 3 days ban, coordinated with about 3+2, mods was applied.

    This is my whole power trip, and I’m so addicted to it, that I onboarded more mods and employed a voting system, so that banning only happens, when no other way of settling an issue can be achieve.

    Edit: The full ban reason was. “Recurring egress linking without providing content for siphoning users. Promotion of community dissolvement.” The textfield was a little small.

    • Blaze (he/him) OP
      link
      fedilink
      03 hours ago

      I mentioned “the mod team” in the post, I never assumed it was only your personal decision.

      Power tripping can happen with a group of mods, it’s actually quite often the case.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        73 hours ago

        See. What I don’t get. If you’re against a community, just don’t participate. You wouldn’t walk in somebodies living room and start a conversation on how much you like the other dudes place.

        Just go to that other dudes place and enjoy the better company.

        That way all people can do things they enjoy.

        • Blaze (he/him) OP
          link
          fedilink
          -13 hours ago

          If you read the other comments here you could get other people’s perspectives.

          Using your analogy, we should never talk about Lemmy on Reddit, just wait for people to magically hear about us.

            • Blaze (he/him) OP
              link
              fedilink
              13 hours ago

              No. My stance is not “we should all go to the bigger place all over the Internet”, it is that “we only have so many Lemmy users, let’s avoid discussion fragmentation for the same topic unless necessary (e.g. power tripping admins)”

              On top of that, I’m generally supportive of more specific communities: https://lemmy.world/post/26609608

              But this one has a different focus, so that makes sense.

              [email protected] and [email protected] are identical

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                4
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                You keep on mixing up two things. One the reason you got banned and calling me/us power tripping.

                Second point the discussion about a merger. I take it that merging is so dear to your heart, that you fight for it. That is fine, and well. What you don’t get is, that other perspectives have validy, too. You keep on ignoring that and bringin the discussion to each and every community. Sometimes even in an hostile and toxic manner (lemme.ee) .

                In other words: you seem to be quite fixated an numbers and have a rough, even hostile commnication style, even victimizing yourself, without telling the whole story and inflaming drama. Why would I want to merge in such a community?

                Also: how come, you can not accept the deciscion of others? Isn’t that trippy itself?

                • Blaze (he/him) OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 hours ago

                  You keep on mixing up two things. One the reason you got banned and calling me/us power tripping.

                  I was clarifying my stance, which you brought up.

                  Sometimes even in an hostile and toxic manner (lemme.ee) .

                  Not sure what you mean, this link doesn’t point to anywhere.

                  rough, even hostile commnication style

                  Feel free to point to such examples for everyone to judge.

                  even victimizing yourself You did ban me for 3 days. Not sure how reporting that fact is victimizing.

                  without telling the whole story and inflaming drama. What whole story is there?

                  Why would I want to merge in such a community?

                  You were offered a mod position to [email protected] . Your whole current team could probably join, the current mods wouldn’t probably mind. I’m just a user.

                  Also: how come, you can not accept the deciscion of others? Isn’t that trippy itself?

                  That argument can be used for any power tripping decision. “The user should accept the power tripping mod decision, or they are themselves power tripping”

              • D_a_X
                link
                fedilink
                12 hours ago

                [email protected] and [email protected] are identical

                Yes and, is it bad if there are two communities with the same content?
                You remind me of my grandchild when it was three years old and wanted to have its way with lots of screaming and shouting. I’s now six and you can already have sensible discussions with the child.
                How old do you have to be to accept that other people see things differently to you?

                By the way: Somehow there’s a rumor going around on Lemmy that you’re also trying this with other instances and other communities.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3711 hours ago

    Some people can’t gey away from the centralised mindset. Why not both instances? That’s the essence of the Fediverse!? It’s not a zero sum game, unless I’m missing something…

    • snooggums
      link
      English
      1511 hours ago

      You aren’t missing anything, especially if they have different contexts.

      The only issue I see is that when the same articles are posted to different communities the discussion is split. But that also happens for similar, but not identical posts even within the same community when they are posted hours apart.

      • Blaze (he/him) OP
        link
        fedilink
        1311 hours ago

        especially if they have different contexts.

        What is the different context between the two communities in this case?

        • snooggums
          link
          English
          310 hours ago

          I was speaking in general, not this exact scenario.

          But if they merged, all posts on the topic are at the mercy of the instance admins and mods. So if a community for buy EU was on an instance that limited all posts to English, users wouldn’t be able to post in German like they can on feddit.org. not saying the UK would do that, but it would apply to an all English instance. Or the posts could be in the context of the instance location. Like a similar community on lemmy.ca would probably be focused on buying from the EU with the context of shipping to Canada.

          No, I won’t be spending my time finding the ratio of these two exact communities because I am disagreeing with the need to consolidate in general.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 hours ago

          Well, they’re on different websites, for one. That context, despite what many here want to believe, is meaningful.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 hours ago

      A lot of people get ants in their pants over the idea of people talking about the same or similar things in different places, for some reason. Decentralization’s just a buzz word, I guess.

      • Sunshine (she/her)
        link
        fedilink
        59 hours ago

        Decentralization’s just a buzz word, I guess.

        That’s why communities should be evenly split amongst instances. There’s no need to fragment the conversation unless the 2 or more communities have differing cultures.

  • db0M
    link
    fedilink
    2611 hours ago

    PTB. Leaving a comment like this doesn’t hurt anyone, even if it’s on every post. The mod just doesn’t want to lose power.

  • Shadow
    link
    fedilink
    2511 hours ago

    Yeah I’d say PTB. They’re more interested in maintaining control, than what’s good for the users and community.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    1310 hours ago

    PTB.

    Ideally the communities should be consolidated in this case. But if they aren’t (e.g. they’re geared towards different target audiences), there’s no harm on linking one from another.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      -110 hours ago

      Clearly consolidation is a bad idea here. Feddit.org community mods are idiots unfit for modding.

      We need decentralization to fight these clowns

  • fxomt
    link
    fedilink
    1511 hours ago

    It’s recommended in the sidebar? And you got banned for quoting that??

    With all due respect to the other mod, i’m going with PTB.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Oof, that is really unfortunate behaviour there. I know moderating can be tough and sometimes emotionally charged, but this really seems like overstepping their boundaries to the detriment of the community. Especially considering I know how much work you have been and are doing for fediverse growth and content.

    Also, might be interesting to crosspost this to [email protected] - although the community there can sometimes flipflop from actually interesting and insightful to slightly toxic.

  • AwesomeLowlander
    link
    fedilink
    710 hours ago

    That’s a shame. I’m guessing the new sudden mod responsibilities went to somebody who isn’t ready for it.