Me personally, I’d rather have hands for feet. Makes me feel primal.

  • JM⭐
    link
    121 day ago

    Definitely feet for hands. Would make sucking my toes so much easier.

    • CephirothOP
      link
      English
      21 day ago

      I would have thought part of the appeal was becoming, for a short moment, a contortionist.

  • GuidoSarducci
    link
    English
    71 day ago

    hands for feet, the possibilities with 4 hands is crazy. walking would suck though

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 day ago

      Eh, I have super long toes that I can grab and manipulate stuff with and it’s actually pretty great. The pain is finding shoes that fit, though.

    • CephirothOP
      link
      English
      41 day ago

      Ankists or wrankles?

        • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
          link
          English
          21 day ago

          You’re going to want wrist bones down there. An ankle is intended to support a foot. Ever seen a skeleton?

          You’ll be quite weak until you’ve fully trained your new floor slappers, but at least they’ll have functional range of movement.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 day ago

            Hypothetically, although I’m still partial to just sticking with the things that evolved to handle ambulatory locomotion, and leave fine environmental manipulation to the upper body.

            • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
              link
              English
              21 day ago

              I guess I’m confused what we’re talking about specifically here. Our wrists stack up against the base of the hand, but if you look at a foot bone chart and how an ankle interfaces, it’s more of a connection to the talus at a 90⁰ angle. I feel like you’re going to need a hybrid joint that preserves the intra-articular surface and the mechanical connection for walking, unless your plan is to mainly exist as a climber.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 day ago

                My apologies. It turns out that the source of your confusion is… My utter lack of reading comprehension. You see, I originally misread the question posed by the post as what essentially amounts to “would you rather have hands or feet… for feet”, and after considering the matter, concluded that the extra manipulatory capabilities didn’t outweigh the drawbacks to movement, and so answered ‘feet’, i.e. “I’m good, thanks”. You can see how the confusion percolated from there, I’m sure.

                • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
                  link
                  English
                  21 day ago

                  All good. Only thing I really wanted was a chance to use the phrase “floor slappers” in a conversation ^^

  • @Today
    link
    31 day ago

    So we can choose 4 hands or 4 feet?

    • CephirothOP
      link
      English
      31 day ago

      Yeah, although this presents another interesting question…hands on legs and feet on arms?