A lawsuit filed in federal court by the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana on Tuesday challenges a new state law that prohibits citizens from being within 25 feet of law enforcement officers.

The law, which went into effect on July 1, is called a violation of constitutional rights by the ACLU, which claims that citizens have a right to “observe and record the police.”

  • @Fredselfish
    link
    4011 months ago

    Wait WTF how does that work…now these fuckers can arrest you for just being in their presences of a cop. Wow this is fucked up. Who come up with this law and before you answer it some asshat with R by their name.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      2711 months ago

      Who come up with this law and before you answer it some asshat with R by their name.

      A whole bunch of asshats with R by their names, aka the Indiana legislature, along with our esteemed coward governor, Holcomb.

      • Vegaprime
        link
        English
        711 months ago

        They acting like I do t have crazy zoom on my phone. We gonna see you.

        • dtc
          link
          311 months ago

          25’ is a good distance to stop audio recording, unless your mic got a zoom too.

          Dirty cops are happy about this law. The funny thing about Indiana is that all they have is dirty cops.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s really bad, but not quite as bad as that - the article lies about what the bill does. This bill would make it a crime for a person to come within a certain distance of a police officer performing duties if the person is told by the officer to stop moving or to move away.

      More explicitly:

      Provides that a person who knowingly or intentionally approaches within 25 feet of a law enforcement officer after the law enforcement officer has ordered the person to stop commits a Class C misdemeanor.

      So they absolutely can arrest you for being in their presence; the minor caveat is that you have to be ordered to stop first, so you have some warning. What a fucked up bill.

      The asshats by name (see iga link above, this is public information):

      Authors:

      Representative Wendy McNamara Republican, District 76

      Representative Michael Karickhoff Republican, District 30

      Representative Jim Pressel Republican, District 20

      Representative Steve Bartels Republican, District 74

      Sponsors:

      Senator Aaron Freeman Republican, District 32

      Senator Jack Sandlin Republican, District 36

      Senator Mark Messmer Republican, District 48

      Senator Linda Rogers Republican, District 11

      • @DAVENP0RT
        link
        4
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        So they absolutely can arrest you for being in their presence; the minor caveat is that you have to be ordered to stop first, so you have some warning.

        In practice, there won’t be warnings. They’ll say, out of the blue, “I told you to move away,” and then arrest everyone in the vicinity.

        Also, how does this bill treat cops approaching you? For example, even if the cops do give warning, what if they continuously walk towards the person warned? I think this law is ripe for abuse by cops, who famously love to abuse.

      • @Fredselfish
        link
        311 months ago

        Wow a lot of fucking Republicans who want to give cops full authority over the populalist. Wonder why? Must be worried about upheaval because they making the place a shit hole to live in?

  • @tallwookie
    link
    English
    611 months ago

    i guess they havent heard of this neat “zooming” thing that cameras can do

    • KairuByte
      link
      English
      1311 months ago

      “This recording is inadmissible, it was zoomed in so much it’s impossible to tell with any certainty what is going on.”

      Digital zoom is literally just cropping out the rest of the video. You’re not actually zooming in, you’re just losing context.

      • @tallwookie
        link
        English
        511 months ago

        there’s optical zoom too, though it’s true that many cameras dont have that option

        • KairuByte
          link
          English
          511 months ago

          In a perfect world, sure. But in reality, the majority of devices do not have optical zoom. Most recordings of police are done on cellphones, and usually older And/or lower end models that aren’t using optical zoom.

  • Froyn
    link
    fedilink
    411 months ago

    I can see that going really well.
    “Step back! 25 feet!”
    "You’re walking towards me. I’m just standing here.
    “I said Step Back!” Discharges Taser while continuing to close distance

  • Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    411 months ago

    But how can they get away with killing black people if the populace are allowed to get close enough to record them? Think of the cops!